jakoz
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2001
- Messages
- 3,140
I dont really know how to articulate this, but here goes...
Ive spent virtually every nang over the last *6 months* in the same loop. It starts with me getting deja-vu, then getting deja-vu on the deja-vu, quickly going downhill from there, and looping within the loop over and over until my brain fails, i glimpse the knowledge i need to break out of the loop, and then promptly forget it, collapsing into laughter as I realise Ive failed yet again and have added another cycle to the loop. Today I *think* i managed to solve it, but have had 3 or 4 false solutions in the past, so we'll see
Anyway, this tears my mind apart every time I nang, and I seem to be the only one I know who is consistently in this loop.... just wondering anyone else is stuck in the same loop?
My parting sentiment is always bitter irony, as I realise my mind has beaten itself yet again, and I came *that close* to the solution.
I cant do the loop, with its 100 or so steps, justice on here, but you get the idea
---------------
EDIT: cancle... you're right. My answer must be divulged
At first I got sidetracked by other answers to other side riddles such as the one below, but on solving them, and thinking I had solved the riddle, the loop still continued.
-----------------------
So the (hopefully) final conclusion Ive gotten:
-Think of nangs as 'deja-vu juice'. Therefore, you are not REALLY experiencing deja-vu, but the chemical imbalance that causes deja-vu. Therefore, there is no loop. It doesnt exist... it only seems like it does, complicated by my next point:
-It was hard to work out how the loop happened, and now I think I know why. The loop, instead of happening afresh each time, happens in increments of 10-20 loops per nang. Each has deja-vu on top of it, so you really ARE remembering some of the loop - it has happened to you before. The problem is that we find it impossible to distinguish between different segments of the loop, and cannot tell when the chunks of the loop were assembled.
Sounds like gobblygook, even to me, but it's the best way I can put it.
[ 09 December 2001: Message edited by: Jakoz ]
Ive spent virtually every nang over the last *6 months* in the same loop. It starts with me getting deja-vu, then getting deja-vu on the deja-vu, quickly going downhill from there, and looping within the loop over and over until my brain fails, i glimpse the knowledge i need to break out of the loop, and then promptly forget it, collapsing into laughter as I realise Ive failed yet again and have added another cycle to the loop. Today I *think* i managed to solve it, but have had 3 or 4 false solutions in the past, so we'll see
Anyway, this tears my mind apart every time I nang, and I seem to be the only one I know who is consistently in this loop.... just wondering anyone else is stuck in the same loop?
My parting sentiment is always bitter irony, as I realise my mind has beaten itself yet again, and I came *that close* to the solution.
I cant do the loop, with its 100 or so steps, justice on here, but you get the idea
---------------
EDIT: cancle... you're right. My answer must be divulged
At first I got sidetracked by other answers to other side riddles such as the one below, but on solving them, and thinking I had solved the riddle, the loop still continued.
-----------------------
So the (hopefully) final conclusion Ive gotten:
-Think of nangs as 'deja-vu juice'. Therefore, you are not REALLY experiencing deja-vu, but the chemical imbalance that causes deja-vu. Therefore, there is no loop. It doesnt exist... it only seems like it does, complicated by my next point:
-It was hard to work out how the loop happened, and now I think I know why. The loop, instead of happening afresh each time, happens in increments of 10-20 loops per nang. Each has deja-vu on top of it, so you really ARE remembering some of the loop - it has happened to you before. The problem is that we find it impossible to distinguish between different segments of the loop, and cannot tell when the chunks of the loop were assembled.
Sounds like gobblygook, even to me, but it's the best way I can put it.
[ 09 December 2001: Message edited by: Jakoz ]