Animal Mother
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 3,411
My sexual history is with a very broad demographic of women. I believe this is how most straight women feel.
That's like saying "if they care if you do drugs, they are too judgmental to begin with"First off if they care, they probably are too judgmental to begin with. If you ever have trouble answering this question seriously, just repeat the question to her. Then stipulate that, "I am sorry m'lady but I cannot like you if you have been with a man".
....LikewiseSuch a confusing set of sentences. Dude comes up to you says "hey I kind of feel like sucking a dick" the normal response would be "alright go find one, or don't". Instead everyone has immediately said "gay", "bisexual", "bicurious", (and I shit you not) "STRAIGHT-COCK SUCKER" and two instances of "needing to submit" and sucking a dildo strapped to a girl. These forums often leave me more riddled than any other forum.
I also find animalmother's sample of women fascinating. So I assume that it's not okay for you to actually be with a man, and it's a turn-off because it's an immediate plummeting of your masculinity in their eyes. But it just seems inconsistent that the same women would not see it as a loss of masculinity when you get down and submit to them, performing on their strap-on.
Yeah but illicit drugs (which is what I assume you meant) does bodily harm to the person you love. So naturally the need to not want to see them harm themselves would be a non-judgmental and perfectly human response. On the other hand, the women you date sound like dominatrices, and you "needing to submit" is, uh, what's the technical term, slip of the pen. You project whatever emotions you have about being or having homosexual fantasies onto "broad demographic of women" and then give HORRIBLE advice saying "no, no, no, you have it all wrong. Don't do what sounds sexually pleasing....DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE SUBMIT SUBMIT SUBMIT SUBMIT.That's like saying "if they care if you do drugs, they are too judgmental to begin with"
Where they look at it more like "If they person I am talking to exhibits behavior outside of the norm, or that is consistent with detrimental personalities, then being around them may not be in my best interest"
Sometimes people pass judgement on others for passing judgement without making an attempt to understand why, and that's as bad as the perceived first passing of judgment lol
Yeah but illicit drugs (which is what I assume you meant) does bodily harm to the person you love. So naturally the need to not want to see them harm themselves would be a non-judgmental and perfectly human response. On the other hand, the women you date sound like dominatrices, and you "needing to submit" is, uh, what's the technical term, slip of the pen. You project whatever emotions you have about being or having homosexual fantasies onto "broad demographic of women" and then give HORRIBLE advice about saying "no, no, no, you have it all wrong. Don't do what sounds sexually pleasing....DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE SUBMIT SUBMIT SUBMIT SUBMIT.
I mean you get the point I am driving home right?
Exactly you solved the riddle. Sorry ma'am if you have slept with another man I cannot sleep with you. Which would imply if she ever desired a man you would not want to be with her. Boom, it wasn't meant to be. The logic cancels itself out. Do you realize how much time you would have saved not pandering to a "large demographic of women"? Also I think that anyone who says "I have a pretty good idea what the other gender is thinking" is going to be wrong 99.99999999% of the time.
God speed.
I don't know I am pretty high, sucking on a dildo because it's so aesthetically pleasing.I'm not quite sure if you're high or not, but I'll try to explain.
Well you sound like a dick now don't you? "A choice to stay away from those with personalities outside of the norm" -- "To protect themselves" I'm sorry but when you were sucking a dildo did you think to yourself "maybe this isn't for anybody's protection, maybe my confusion has manifested into some bazaar carnival which I project onto other people". I mean I am not here to throw stones, however you get your jollies is just fine. But my God he came in with a simple question with the most simple answer possible and it is alluded.When I say that they are making a choice to stay away from those with personalities outside of the norm, then I'm saying it's to protect themselves, not the person they would potentially be involved with.
Hahahaha well put.Haha I love everyone's speculation. Man just go find you a juicy one and report back.
I don't know I am pretty high, sucking on a dildo because it's so aesthetically pleasing.
You're lost again, and instead of arguing a point that makes sense ( I'm about to explain to you, again, where you've lost what I've said ) You've reverted to insulting me. This behavior usually correlates with a lower IQ.Well you sound like a dick now don't you? "A choice to stay away from those with personalities outside of the norm" -- "To protect themselves" I'm sorry but when you were sucking a dildo did you think to yourself "maybe this isn't for anybody's protection, maybe my confusion has manifested into some bazaar carnival which I project onto other people". I mean I am not here to throw stones, however you get your jollies is just fine. But my God he came in with a simple question with the most simple answer possible and it is alluded.
The definition of insanity is a state of minding that is outside of the norm. Insane or troubled people tend to make bad choices, and it's advisable to stay away from them. This is why people make generalizations; for self preservation. No, I'm not a dick for pointing out something that all cognizant beings do instinctively.
So the flaw in your analogy is that if I was sucking on a girl's dildo, then I wasn't doing anything for the sake of Self preservation and that wasn't my concern at the time. So, I wouldn't ever be confused about it "maybe this isn't for anybody's protection..."
And you don't know the history of the girls that I've been with, nor do you know what lead up to that sexual experience with that particular girl. In that case, after we had been having sex for a while, she told me that she would enjoy teasing my ass, and I said that was ok. This eventually lead to her asking if she could use a toy with me. No, I did not project anything to make this happen, nor am I confused.
Lastly, the man did not come in with a "simple question" He came in with a very conflicting problem.
Okay and secondly if you love someone you're going to soon realize that they have many personal problems. Your love for them ideally should trump any 'confusion' or 'personal problems' (that one was my personal favorite). This is Agape. And I would say that you give horrible, dreadful advice.
And I would say that you're attacking me, because of the aforementioned frustration/low IQ.
I'm not talking about if you love some one, I'm talking about forming that love in the first place. Whether you think it's ok, and are accepting of the man's sexual exploration, doesn't matter. The simple fact is that MOST of the world will pass judgement on him, and it will be detrimental for him in forming new relationships.
What's more, people daydreaming about the idea of unconditional love sometimes are the ones that fall into abusive and unhealthy relationships. Yes, those exist and are very bad for people despite the fact that they love each other very much. So "any" confusion or personal problems, maybe be a slight exaggeration?
I do not dispute this.This behavior usually correlates with a lower IQ.
The definition of insanity is a state of minding that is outside of the norm. Insane or troubled people tend to make bad choices, and it's advisable to stay away from them. This is why people make generalizations; for self preservation. No, I'm not a dick for pointing out something that all cognizant beings do instinctively.
So the flaw in your analogy is that if I was sucking on a girl's dildo, then I wasn't doing anything for the sake of Self preservation and that wasn't my concern at the time. So, I wouldn't ever be confused about it "maybe this isn't for anybody's protection...
Lastly, the man did not come in with a "simple question" He came in with a very conflicting problem
And I would say that you're attacking me, because of the aforementioned frustration/low IQ