Just a few thoughts after having viewed the EDD issue in question. Given that I do not know the specifics of BL bureaucracy, some of these suggestions may already be in place, but I thought I would throw them out there. If some of my suggestions are already in place, feel free to assrape me.
1) It seems apparent to me that if there aren't already some more formalized administrative checks and balances, there ought to be. As BL continues to grow/evolve I think some formal system will be required-we can't rely on an informalized bureaucratic infrastructure. In the EDD dispute in question, while I don't know Catch-22 personally and I would not impugn his motives in doing what he's doing, it seems to me that the methodology of going about it was flawed.
For instance, I think that any changes to forum format should be subjected to a panel vote of 3 Administrators, but only after a vote of the forum participants listing all possible alternatives is taken. Basically what I'm saying is that I think there needs to be some type of formal BL administrative Constitution set up, if there isn't one already, with specific guidelines for such major issues as forum changes that would formalize a bureaucratic procedure for enacting such changes while at the same time preserving (to the greatest extent possible) BL membership input on the changes.
2) If we assume that BL will continue to grow, I think it's inevitable at some point that we have to consider making certain forums "premium pay access" to support the additional infrastructure required to run them. While I would advocate maintaining such essential functions as harm reduction/education forums as free access, I think that the non-essential high-traffic forums will have to be converted to premium access forums to support the required infrastructure...it just seems inevitable to me.
The benefits of making certain forums premium pay access:
a) Less trolling/alterego harassment-trolls are far less likely to engage in such behavior if their premium access is revoked and they have to pay a reinstatement fee...for that matter, most trolls probably wouldn't pay the premium to begin with. Would also cut down on flaming/ad homs if premium members knew their access could also be revoked for excessively offensive behavior. Of course, such revocation would also require a formalized bureaucratic process to ensure checks and balances against abuse.
b) Reinforces a "long-haul" view of BL life-if you're required to pay to access certain forums, you're more likely to place an emphasis on the value of BL, and support its quality accordingly. It would also discourage "bump and run" traffic and encourage more initial bonding of new members in the free "newbie" forums, thereby offering greater cohesion once the members moved up to the premium pay forums.
c) Would allow BL to better support the work of the mods/admins by providing funds for technical support, and even remuneration if need be.
3) Finally, (though this is really just window-dressing) I think we ought to adopt a BLer "Bill of Rights" which essentially incorporates the Code of Conduct...e.g., the right to be free from harassment/"alterego stalking", the right to be free of ad hom attacks, etc.
And no, I don't think the right to have sex with any other BLer upon request would make the cut...not on the initial Bill of Rights anyway. Maybe as an Amendment or something if 2/3 of the membership approved it.