Can I just ask, how did you come up with this figure? Do you have any specific examples? Did you run a study critiquing the effectiveness of the website?
After all,
You're guilty of all three criticisms in your opening post.
Yes Sir, The thread(s) I reference to containing at LEAST 75% incorrect were on Nitros Oxide use, and Opiods combined, and the second was a thread by an admitted heroin addict who had a fear of using LSD.
He was openly encouraged to "go on and trip, Nothing bad will happen" right up to claims that Heroin ,and LSD DO NOT share receptors in the brain. The latter gem was posted by a Mod. whom I corrected but again the flaming.
The last post I read on that thread was the OP stating how his friend had a bad trip, and killed himself.
I wonder how the posters encouraging this fella to take LSD felt? Especially the ones that may have understood that they should have NEVER posted opinion.
The second quote / reply I do not understand... The opening post on this thread?
This is not a medical advice thread. It is more about how advice should be presented or qualified. I feel I have made a fair presentation of the facts based on my albeit short time here.
If you, and Admin. look up the threads I posted in you will find that 75% is a generous number on the threads I did interact on.
A site wide assay is another issue but from a random sampling you can get a general feel for the overall health.
Strangely enough I did find the people posting in the political threads to be much more gracious, and open to discussion. The most polarizing of topics had the fewest issues.
It is the medical advice being mis leading at best that concerns me. The rest is of no real concern.
