MynameisnotDeja said:
Actually, I'm pretty sure I'm aware of my body more than anyone else, and therefore the best judge of what helps me. I'm the one living in here.
I agree with this. If you know how to listen to your body, your insights about how it works will be very valuable to your decision-making process.
About the liver flush, my friend's grandfather was telling us just last month about how they utilized this method to flush out gallstones to avoid operations during the war. Apparently, it involved a lot of walking around... Once you take the concoction you could not sit down until the morning. The American doctors thought it was stupid, but they eventually began using it in the makeshift wartime hospital of the area because it was effective.
(Long)
Not that science isn't valuable, but sometimes the adherence to what a few experts call science borders on dogma. (Or, science is so narrowly defined!) Definitely if people knew how to read their reactions to food, etc. more effectively, their aggregated observations would be add much valuable to all the studies that are coming out.
The US has a food industry based on "science". Studies show this-and-that is the new wonder food, lowers blabla, is harmful for your health. So-and-so is the allowable amount, X is safe in minimal, these are the allowable amounts. Planning your diet and building your food pyramid around research and studies. It is a totally confused and young eating and healing arena.
I understand the context-- that the US is a culture of immigrants with no single "line" of culture, passed-on tradition, or knowledge of native plants and food products.
However, discounting "alternative" health practices as un-scientific and therefore ineffective, is quite irresponsible. To a large degree, this assumes that validation by scholarly work is a pre-requisite to effectiveness. I am quite wary of newfangled inventions towards preventive health. However, I have more faith in traditional or other alternative medicine than Western medicine, simply because time and tremendous anecdotal information to be more reliable than piecemeal studies that do not cite the myriad other variables to be found outside a laboratory.
That being said, the way that Western medicine organizes its health studies is very reductionist and immature, in my view. Furthermore, it is extremely dogmatic and lacks attention to the subtleties of the body. It is not the information that is there, but how this information is arranged that I find to be lacking the capacity to see the big picture.
When only an expert is "fit" to tell you about the status of your body, there is something wrong with the system.
Personally, there were so many signs that we had been taught to observe since we were young-- our tongue, our voice, our sleeping patterns, how we feel when we wake up, our hair quality, our poop! On all counts of my past health problems, I was always 200x more successful at detecting, deducing, and solving them than any Western-oriented health specialist I went to-- and I consulted some of the best, both here and of the private industry in the US. From my experiences with them, I can safely conclude that many of them know many small details, and I applaud them for being able to memorize all those names of diseases and such.
If it "helps" you like the power of prayer does, then you're just enjoying the benefits of the placebo effect.
"just" is not a good way to describe this. A "placebo effect" of something like a spontaneous remission from an evangelical prayer session is very real even though science cannot figure out why it happened.