jamesBrown
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 2,711
^I don't think I've seen anyone on here claim that experiences not detailed in scientific experiments are necessarily false or "bare no value".
I was responding to your post that suggested that I was "naieve" for believing peoples personal experience automatically. ....which , i explained, I do not do....and was smply trying to get that point across to you.
You said to me...
"... swallowing whatever someone gives you whole without checking first is not a good way to determine validity."
but I was saying that I DO NOT "swallow whatever someone gives me whole" without checking it first.
Your post to me suggested that I belived everyones experiences as truth without verifying that through the correct methods. And I wanted to set the records straight and say that I DO NOT do that. thats all.
And yes, there are people on BL that constantly treat me like shit, literally, for bringing up someones personal experience as "evidence" for a point im making. They act like since that persons personal experience is not scientificially studied/proven, it has no merit whatsoever, and shouldnt even be brought up. ANd I disagree with this. I think that we can look at personal experiences to possibly broaden out perspective, while not necssarily assuming that everythign they experience/say is based in fact. Like I said....."evidence" is not the same as fact. Evidence can help us determine what is fact and what isnt.....but just because some evidence isnt "proven" by scientists, doesnt mean it shouldnt be discussed.
And I guarantee you that many people have laughed at me and other posters who bring up someones personal experience to make a point, or contrbute to a conversation. If you wouold like me to literally search for some examples of those exact circumstanecs I would be glad to. Just let me know. Its just it takes a little time to wade through all the posts on Bl to find something sometimes....but like I said, I would be ahppy to do it.
Actually....earlier in this thread Cane...you said ....."subjective perceptions are unreliable and essentially useless". im not trying to call you wrong or start an argument, im merely saying that in some instances subjective experiences(perceptions) can actually be helpfull.....they may not be helpfull in proving facts directly, but as i have been trying to say many times, they can be helpful in broadening our perspectives on what is possible.....and that in iteself, could possibly help us in many ways....and even possibly result in making it easier to find/prove facts.