• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | thegreenhand

I Like to Draw Pictures of Random Molecules

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder about compounds like this:
22b3c1a46e.png


They are easily accessible from proline (used as chiral ligands) and presumably have pipradrol - type fx. Sometimes the OH group is either absent or protected/modified (e.g. methoxy, ethoxy)
 
.. does the site www.chemicalize.org for quick chemical data been jacked? by MoneyGrabbin commercial shit holes..type chemicalize.org and you get redirect to chemicalize.com charging zillions for tax payers public money funded programs.. hack'em
 
^
It is still in ChemAxon as owner(original), but they seems to manipulatethe site somehow, now i cannot view the site on my ipad anymore(yor browser is not supported, please use desktop version etc etc).

Too bad i visit and utilize the site alot on my ipad :(
 
ring constrained ketamine... does anyone have information on what the best conformation of ketamine would be to fit into the binding site at NMDAr? this constrained version could go either way imho
 
..this constrained version could go either way imho
Yes, hit or miss! But I think it has reasonable chance binding similarly to ketamine. In that case may be 10x more potent than ket because of ring constrained. + it will be legit since it is not an arylcyclohexylamine but an indanyl! The PCP site on NMDA is not particularly demanding: eg (+)DXM ie dextromethorphan and its enantiomer (-)DXM levorphanol both bind NMDAr with similar affinity..It doesn't happen often especially with brain receptors, ions channels..etc. Usually only one enantiomer will bind.

... does anyone have information on what the best conformation of ketamine would be to fit into the binding site at NMDAr?
The standard NMDAr antagonist, the most potent by far (ca 800x more potent than ketamine) is dizocilpine MK-801 MK-ultra. Very constrained molecule with not many conformations possible: pretty much a single conformation (2 for the racemic!).

175px-Dizocilpine.svg.png
175px-Dizocilpine_with_tube_model.png


Does arylcyclohexylamines like ketamine, MXE..etc bind at the same site as MK? in that case, overlaying the aryl of arylcyclohexylamines with one of the phenyl of MK and of course the amino groups of the 2. That means adding a phenyl to the cyclohexyl of ketamine MXE..etc(I mean to get something like a tetraline) will give more potent NMDAr than ketamine mxe..etc...and legit! at least in the UK since they won't be arylcyclohexyl but aryltetralinylamines..so technically not cyclohexylamines aryl but who knows?

PS: now MK-ultra is way too potent imho (risks of irreversible permanent pyschosis + Olney's lesions.. but who knows?
 
actually a spiroisoindolylcyclohexane

ttsts24_zps9g5cvadl.png

more precisely: 7'-chloro-2',3'-dihydrospiro[cyclohexane-1,1'-isoindole]-2-one
 
i didn't go through the whole thread (again), so excuse me if this has already been posted:
since propylhexedrine seems to be at least active, and i was a fan of 4-fa, i just have to ask ^^
1875b24055.jpg

i know this "hybrid" or "mixtures" of chemical structures is a bit misleading, you don't get the best of two worlds most of the time..
but it might be active, possibly not very enjoyable, but well... this thread has its name for a reason :)
 
i didn't go through the whole thread (again), so excuse me if this has already been posted:
since propylhexedrine seems to be at least active, and i was a fan of 4-fa, i just have to ask ^^
1875b24055.jpg

i know this "hybrid" or "mixtures" of chemical structures is a bit misleading, you don't get the best of two worlds most of the time..
but it might be active, possibly not very enjoyable, but well... this thread has its name for a reason :)

AFAIK the aromatic ring in ampethamine pi stacks with an electron rich tyrosine residue (Tyr 182? Correct me if I'm wrong) in the S1 pocket of DAT which helps stabilise its pose. Losing aromaticity means this interaction is lost, and it will reduce the potency of this drug. Not to mention it'll probably have less affinity for other relevant intracellular proteins like TAAR1 and VMAT. Propylhexedrine is significantly less active than methamphetamine.
 
AFAIK the aromatic ring in ampethamine pi stacks with an electron rich tyrosine residue (Tyr 182? Correct me if I'm wrong) in the S1 pocket of DAT which helps stabilise its pose. Losing aromaticity means this interaction is lost, and it will reduce the potency of this drug. Not to mention it'll probably have less affinity for other relevant intracellular proteins like TAAR1 and VMAT. Propylhexedrine is significantly less active than methamphetamine.

yeah, i know about the huge potency drop, and the same goes for meth vs 4fma, so the already not very potent and side-effect ridden (no 1st hand experience, don't intend to have 1st hand experience) propylhexedrine is probably going to be garbage in the best case and laden withserious side effects - neurotoxicity as with the higher halo-amphetamines, something a la PMA / PMMA or whatever in a worse scenario.. best leave this uncharted land be and sail on :>
 
t03img.jpg


something I drew while on a bus ride recently, no idea if it makes sense, but it looked nice ;)

edit: I am also wondering if a alpha-beta-unsaturated carbonyl is an easy target for metabolism. I made that carbonyl in order to have an sp2 carbon in there to ensure that the ring remained planar.
 
Last edited:
^ the 4-((2-dimethylamino)ethyl)quinolone work "well" as substitute for DMT: I made similar indoles isosteres back in the days!!Tryptophan analogs with the quinolone replacing the indole ;) ). It might work but lsd doesnt tolerate substitution at 2 position of the indole like with the 2-bromoLSD??) .. but who knows. NB: The one terrible thing about these types of quinolones, they're just terribly insoluble and I mean really pain in the ass to get them into any reasonable solvent.. unless you use boiling DMSO or DMF or .. cold conc sulfuric acid 8o
 
211px-Tamagnan_4a.svg.png
DAT: 52 ± 12.8
203px-Tamagnan.svg.png
DAT: 12.1 ± 3
203px-Tamagnan_5a.svg.png
DAT: 12.2 ± 0.9
203px-Tamagnan_5b.svg.png
DAT: 6.4 ± 0.27

Check this out with regard to the QSAR of phenyltropanes: the top two, 2-para-Thiophene & 3-para-Thiophene have 52 ± 12.8 and 12.1 ± 3 for DAT respectively (i.e. 2-thio has tighter binding for the DAT)

But with the Nor/nitrogen-demethylated of the same compounds, it's the opposite: nor-2-thio is 12.2 ± 0.9 @ DAT and nor-3-thio is twice as potent with 6.4 ± 0.27 @ DAT.... (i.e. the 3-thio is the tighter one)

This shows that the methylation of the nitrogen dramatically changes the position of the benzene substitutions in cocaine like molecules that affects monoamine subtype affinity in drastic ways.

Furthermore, one methylene unit length difference at the nitrogen end seems to correspond to one methylene unit length alteration at the benzene substitution end; see how the middle two compounds have basically the same affinity? But the angles have to be deeper (or shallower, or shall we just say 'more optimized'?), because it has increased affinity as it changes both, whereas just adding another unit again on the same side can completely gimp it.
 
Last edited:
^ the 4-((2-dimethylamino)ethyl)quinolone work "well" as substitute for DMT: I made similar indoles isosteres back in the days!!Tryptophan analogs with the quinolone replacing the indole ;) ). It might work but lsd doesnt tolerate substitution at 2 position of the indole like with the 2-bromoLSD??) .. but who knows. NB: The one terrible thing about these types of quinolones, they're just terribly insoluble and I mean really pain in the ass to get them into any reasonable solvent.. unless you use boiling DMSO or DMF or .. cold conc sulfuric acid 8o
interesting, thanks for your comment! maybe it is too bulky, but my feeling says that putting bromine on the 2-position of a Lysergamide will be more bulky than this quinolone thing. bromine is huge! would be interesting to see, if DMT would be active with a 2-bromo-substitution.

well we'll never know unless someone synthesizes that thing and tries it. where are the shulgins of today? ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top