I see people on this forum reporting similar doses to what I have taken, and people tend to disregard it. I am not sure why I am letting myself be drawn into this silly discussion again, probably because the whole "saturation point" is hooey and it drives me nuts to see so many obviously intelligent people buying into it.
Yes, I have taken 1.5 mg, several times. My largest dose was 3 mg. the 3 mg dose was originally 6 mg and change, weighed on a very expensive scale, put in water, and split between two people, myself being one of them.
onset- 5-10 min. Physical symptoms were tremors in major muscle groups (thighs, glutes, lower back), paresthesia of fingers/arms, lack of coordination, sensitivity to lights. Visually, activity started with onset of physical symptoms (or very close in time). Slight crawling of wood grains etc, developing within 45 min into a completely immersive psychedelic state that lasted about 7 hours. Return to body brought a +4 trip for about 2 hours, followed by a slow return to baseline (sorta) over the next 3-5 hours. Comparable to a heavy ayahuasca trip, but very different. More like smoked DMT in it's immersive quality really.
No, I didn't take a DOx or an nBOME, trust me I know. Yes it was LSD.
I usually only am compelled to post here about this issue, because it almost physically pains me that people believe in this obviously flawed "factoid". Ismene in particular seems to almost delight in making such statements, while it's obvious he hasn't taken such doses.
What do the people that espouse the "saturation point" dogma all have in common? None of them have taken high doses.