• S&T Forum Guidelines
  • S&T Moderators: VerbalTruist | Skorpio | alasdairm

Science Debunking Flat Earth Theory: Why the Earth is Undoubtedly Spherical

Mysterier said:
The first image of the Earth from space was in the late 1940s.
Photoshop was created in 1987 and was officially released in 1990.
Click to expand...
I Guess it depends on beliefs.

Ftr though I respect you man and always will be glad to have met you around here.
 
AutoTripper said:
Hi. I'm open and aim to keep grounded, original too so I will say...

I consider Antarctica is a scam, it's an ice wall encircling our Continents or "Known Lands" with a particular large high mountainous region, outside the ice walls heavily guarded militarily are all permiters too, are more vast seas, more lands, we are kept in dark of.

Our Earth we know of is this section.


The Bible is the greatest equivocation ever IMO but truth between lines.

Does state Earth is flat under a dome.

NASA translated into Hebrew means "to deceive"

NASA confess they have to photoshop their images of round Earth get this..

Because they can't get far enough away to take a photo.

The images show the photoshopping too.

Buzz & co swearing never actually went to the moon.


And look at Antarctica "Mass" on Google Earth see the shape transition.


This again isn't my forte though, I am not well had severest most stressful year(s(s)) and I can't deal with overloads of speculation.


But Antractica is interesting though. Flights are more cunningly completely orchestrated coordinated controlled etc, Air space being most tightly regulated of all, the Illusion of this relatively miniature prison space as the only place, round floating spinning no other where to reach, is maintained through many genius mechanisms.


Lots people really into this topic, until I get there myself it's not relevant enough yet.
Click to expand...
given that there is probably a ton of nonsense written about this theory and I have precious little time to wade through it, - could you perhaps link to some relevent stuff you'd consider worth looking at?
 
ageingpartyfiend said:
given that there is probably a ton of nonsense written about this theory and I have precious little time to wade through it, - could you perhaps link to some relevent stuff you'd consider worth looking at?
Click to expand...
Off top atm I haven't stored links for most I have perused, it becomes dull and inhibiting right or wrong, also refreshing always.

For example I know mad as it sounds much of our landscape is actually the petrified aka fossilised or turned into stone ex Titans or giants.

Not only man, Elephants, many sorts huge whole mountains even one giant body.

It became tedious, pointless and not right for me to keep on against grain on all these wider topics when hardest times ever but I can only be fully authentic re my actual genuine every day personal reality still and what it pertains too, because it's a truly mad experience can't ever portray the scale of.


I'll look out for, think on this get back.

"Know the only truth" is a sought after book which I'm sure delves far far past this topic, those walls, our allegedly recorded history, and the nature of Earth, so I hear again & again.

Sorry not anything that way kept at hand but will put mind on it
 
Mysterier said:
The solar system needed a frisbee... and we're it.

Fo0BNvn.jpg
Click to expand...
I was thinking about those pluto images the other day. I got a bigger telescope and could see brown lines on Jupiter and some moons and it made me think about how I can see a clearer image of Jupiter from my yard than NASA could see of Pluto 20 years ago
 
And best before Huble made that in 2003 was literally just a few pixels big. Second pic is from some years ago made by satellite during fly-by. Pluto is way smaller and further away than Saturn so nothing odd about it.
I find it beautiful how Pluto and it's moon are exchanging matter.
 
Even more fascinating than people believing Earth is flat is people who had psychedelic experiences believing that. As you get older bubble of belief of how "teacher molecules" teach most people about true state of existence gets bursted.
 
Hello everyone,

Thank you all for the engaging conversation. It's fascinating to see such a variety of perspectives on the Flat Earth Theory. However, the overwhelming scientific evidence supports the spherical nature of our planet. Let's address some of the points raised:

  1. Photoshop and NASA Images: It's true that digital enhancements are often used in space imagery, primarily for clarity and color correction. However, this doesn't negate the fact that the original images, taken as far back as the 1940s, consistently show a spherical Earth. Photoshop’s creation in the late 1980s doesn’t undermine the authenticity of these images.
  2. Antarctica and the Ice Wall Theory: The idea of Antarctica as an ice wall encircling the Earth is a popular flat Earth narrative, but it lacks scientific backing. Antarctica has been extensively explored and studied, with its geography and climate well-documented. The notion of a guarded ice wall falls into the realm of conspiracy without credible evidence.
  3. The Bible and Flat Earth: While some interpretations of religious texts might suggest a flat Earth, it's important to differentiate between religious belief and scientific evidence. The latter relies on observable, testable, and repeatable data.
  4. Moon Landing and Buzz Aldrin: The moon landing conspiracy has been debunked numerous times. There's a wealth of evidence, including telemetry data, thousands of photos, and even reflectors placed on the moon's surface, which are still used for laser-ranging experiments.
  5. Flight Patterns and Navigation: The argument about flight paths and navigation is particularly compelling. Flight routes and maritime navigation have long been based on the understanding of Earth as a sphere. These routes make little sense in a flat Earth model and are based on the principles of great circle routes, which are the shortest paths between two points on a sphere.
  6. Psychedelic Experiences and Perception: While psychedelic experiences can profoundly alter perception and belief, they don't constitute scientific evidence. It's important to differentiate between personal experiences and collective, empirical evidence that can be independently verified.
  7. The Moon's Shape: The theory that the moon is flat and an optical illusion is also not supported by scientific evidence. The moon’s phases, its observable spherical shape, and the lunar eclipses are all consistent with a spherical celestial body.
In conclusion, while it's important to keep an open mind and question our understanding of the world, it's equally crucial to base our beliefs on reliable, scientific evidence. The consensus among the scientific community, based on extensive research and observation, is that the Earth is spherical.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

Best regards,Serhat
 
nepalnt21 said:
how do you explain independent verification?
Click to expand...
How do you explain, this?

The "show" kicks off at 1:45




There is here, as it happened some actual explanation of the matter at hand from myself, typically not but guess I was just summarising my feelings that day irt the matter



And independent verification? Nothing to say there atm. I mean yeah, I "verify" that the above is legit as, happened, happens realer than anything, every day to very variable degree.

And a lot more.


But re Earth as we know it well on this, I saw that private team launching their own camera'd mini rocket into space and it hit the ceiling aka firmament which even the masterfully equivicating Bible tells is a real thing, think depicts flat earth model too with waters around above below or something


Regardless, life is an Illusion incarnated into our 3D matrix system.


AI isn't just emerging, it's the robots and exponentially advanced tech and signal infrastructure


But we are actually composed of AI material. In whatever mad 3D nonsensical way.

My own journey experience and evidence have proven I'm in zero way a nut job too.


Now any regular mainstream Doctor in our Earth, I say doc I've got firm evidence in scores and bundles mate, that "Morgellons" as you will only know it (in my mind it is effectively mislabelled Nanotechnology)...


is NOT a delusion of the patient. A hallucination or fixation/obsession.


I'd never get a hearing. Instant textbook based ruling of "Delusional Parisitosis" ensured.


This is one big elephant to me. All the real things I personally KNOW to be real too which have enabled me to live 18 years after severest Lyne case still allergic to 99% of everything today no exaggeration too

Useless dystegulated immune system, damaged to pieces NS


I have to be ultra proactive and successful in treating caring managing.


Using amongst much eg: Electromedicine for amazing failproof harmless respiratory infection clearing 365


Genuine and hard to find/access clinical homeopathy.

Total Body Modification via specialist chiropractic. Amazing stuff.


Clean medical cannabis, tonnes more super effective stuff


All of which the zero experienced Doctor (of it all) is dead ended into insisting it is all pure quackery, only real evidence so too, provided ofc by the lovely drug companies whi write the medical manual.


So I'm patronised like fuck stuff is 100 real


it's impossible to verify Illusion so magnificent and well guarded though, as the shape/nature/size/location of Earth say.


We cannot fly, sail, walk anywhere, by a blooming stretch.


Flight routes are stupid too.

Air space is most monitored and controlled of all still.

godgevlamste shows enough strong evidence alone too for my mind to know NASA's version is guaranteed to be the biggest lie.


NASA means "to deceive" in Hebrew too.
 
nepalnt21 said:
please present some good evidence for this claim, too
Click to expand...
I don't need to. NASA reek. Free to your own beliefs.

Many others are scholared there, not me, I've simply garnered pieces from around.

I am presenting evidence though, that Morgellons as mistakenly known IS real, isn't a hallucination because if so...,everyone can see it who isn't visually incompetent or just dummy.


I have the history too how it came about for myself, relating to this whole concept of Artificial Intelligence Nanotechnology governing our reality including bodies.


I could present should-be bloody enough evidence on chemtrailing and Geoengineering too, again if there is a need there, a battle, fight


I consider it a mute cause.


Now no clever observant half-critucal body can deny the obvious reality of what I show

I've hundreds examples too.


Millions likely trillions in all these minute Nano fibres been evaluates from my own body since May 2022.


And I can recount every precise accurate chronological detail, event, development etc throughout this all.



So again only a fool will be so arrogant as to cognitive dissonnatly erect big fences of firm resistance, to my general line on this


Given that they are greener than a plantain on it, with respect, I was too!


And I am qualified, experienced here, not delusional crazy stupid invested wishful etc
Truth is all. I don't like it.


Most people in life incl BL, in "truth" actually do not desire to know it.


Escape. It's understandable and the basic consious human condition after all.


But I was never crafted this way and I will look full glare through any obilisque I ever see even if the Emperor, IS awaiting me just the other side lol, with Vader
 
someguyontheinternet said:
This morgellons?

Morgellons - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
You STILL fail mate? To see the obvious life in every footage I actually have bothered to upload?


And trust WIKI? And our govts? Well obviously cos you over buy the shot lies, cannot consider Chemtrails as a reality

Altogether it marks one as being strongly under spell and programming.

This, I cannot shake. Nor reason with as the reason is fake and artificial.
 
alasdairm said:
it's pretty easily debunked with a couple of minutes reading.

alasdair
Click to expand...
I just tested those waters. Unbiased too.

First slightly definitive thing I came across though was

"Hebrew word Nasha is Strong's H5377 and means to lead astray, to delude, bequile, to deceive, to seduce. Appears to me to describe what NASA does and has bee..."
 
the organisation is called nasa, not nasha.

would you also conclude that the entire town of nashua, nh can't be trusted? it's one letter away too.

alasdair
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top