Hi again Treezy,
...that has nothing to do with the plant itself. (and i agree with your post)
i was more referring to problems caused by consuming cannabis.
Me too i was refering to the cannabis plant, and you know it's not tomatoes which were used to justify all of this wrong doing that takes place on a continental scale. But i suppose your intent was to discuss chronic cannabic intoxication, etc. I can recognize that.
Well, i've been a chronic hashish smoker and thanks to the anti-cannabic prohibition war i was never even told that i didn't have to smoke it at all, vapes are so much better actually!!
To be exact it was a pro-cannabic web site which provided me information, 3 years after i quit all smoking definitively in 2007, once in my fifties. Better late than nothing but the damage done by 25 years of smoking is quite real, it's the bigot's lasting legacy - consequence of other people's abuse who view themselves as pure while persecuting total strangers, over dry flowers...
Honnestly you can never give the "good guys" an inch knowing the wrost cases among them behave like true criminals, supposedly to impose an ideology but i suspect it's beyond morals, euh...
Smoking is bad, cannabis is said to have a protective effect relatively to cancer; others will contradict this finding and the discussion could go on until exhaustion. What i can tell in terms of personnal experience is that i see a difference between smoke and vapour in terms of "addiction": it's not the same.
The problem is we need to go through a couple generations who have been lucky to benefit from real guidance and information,
in a world where the cannabic statistics no longer get so much scrambled by social/legal noise, whatever. Some day our societies will have to decide to be coherent and treat "stoners" at least as respectfully as true addicts consuming alcohol and/or tobacco, who play their salary on lotery, etc., etc. Once people have been allowed to deal with cannabis away from all unfairness we may have data which does actually hep, finally.
So, what about this site's own favourite topic, Harm Reduction?! Where was this rare ingredient when i needed it most in the '80s??? See where i come from?...
In conclusion HR was kept under the cover and no dealer ever distributed me pamphlets on vaporism while i could have kept my lungs in a healthier state if i had known. All this because of a plant they prefer to name "marijuana" (read "marihuana")...
Lets suppose i watch someone going after trouble and i'm too focussed on being correct to offer this person an alternative. I'm no criminal and perhaps the other guy is, so where's my overdose by bigotry intoxication should this person fail badly?...
When a guy just needs a hand and he's tired of liars it wouldn't hurt anyone to promote vaporisation. In comparison lies can cause more damage, much more sometimes.
So. I'm afraid i can't agree to concessions. They're at war, well armed and always shoot to kill - in case some of us didn't notice.
In the meantime... Good day, have fun!