• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: Xorkoth | Madness

Circumcision

LoL.

Anyways I just wanted to add my 2c.

Foreskin removal is more than just the loss of sexual function. It has a definite effect on the brain and mindset of the male. Most people don't know/understand this.
odd i had a boyfriend/ lovers, cut an uncut and they all were highly functional,i know the uncut are to be more sensitive supposedly , got your flesh to protect the member , but to imagine what we are trying to get across for me is not much of a matter except being a tad embarrassed of our childs minor speech impediment lingo to others that took it literal , just reminded me of skinned (shelled)Whole peanuts(uncut) chopped, penis meant lil peanuthhhh to her just for her consumption at that time and i purged a memory , im finding many BLighters can do this w/o rhyme or reason, but in this discussion, the shit back in the face might be disregarded and blown off, but yeah well stated, you might like another that you ran off persay cuz maybe they can only dish it out but not take it,i dont know but perhaps clarify, i love to learn both sides of people views. unbiased. i rambled yah duh(omgah i said ,duh) i dont let folks humiliate any one here in BL with out care, be it noob or a 16 yr vet, and ty for tolerance cus that was out there, but a walk in the park for me, guess yah im more grateful to have a lil hood then all the peenuthhhhhh in the world!! hops off an old penith oil soap box mumbling a chant of no more female genital mutilation~ respect the discussion, and not a good time to chime in with chopped penis with a mirthful memory , chose to being a joker in tense times but thats wrong often, again ty for not being rude, appreciate your 2 senceth lacuna
 
Trust me, the weeny that wears a turtle neck, grosses women out. The cock that goes w/o the turtle neck is much prettier.
~ says 90% of women
 
Trust me, the weeny that wears a turtle neck, grosses women out. The cock that goes w/o the turtle neck is much prettier.
~ says 90% of women
i find interesting that many many gay men have fetish with uncut,,,,survey says! gay males
number one answer isssssssss.... ding ding> docking!<dont look that up if shocked easily nor look up worst family feud answers
 
Trust me, the weeny that wears a turtle neck, grosses women out. The cock that goes w/o the turtle neck is much prettier.
~ says 90% of women

90% of women, most of who are probably unashamedly pro-choice, so in reality they're not really pro-choice at all since they think men should be forced to convert to helmets when they're too young to consent. There is nothing pro-choice about forcing genital surgery on an infant for non-medical reasons. If someone wants to get their dick chopped up they can do it when they're old enough LULZ.
 
@0.o_LaCuNa_o.0

I can imagine. I live in a society where it is hardly practiced at all and which is slow to criticise other religious/cultural practices, however it would be considered barbaric by the majority of us (for all the reasons identified in the foregoing posts).
 
I don't agree with circumcision in general but I think the reaction to it is so over the top.

It's a loss, sure, but it's not a major loss. Unless a guy had a circumcision done badly, they aren't losing major functionality.

I wish people would stop acting like it's "mutilation" or the guy got his "dick chopped off". It's removal of a layer of skin... a useful layer, but not a layer that is so stupendously necessary for a fulfilling life. Most cut guys don't know there's a problem until some fanatic goes off on them about it. They're no more mutilated than someone who had their tonsils removed. I never had a problem with my body until I met my first anti-circumcision crusader, who was a woman of course; and she wanted to know how I felt about being mutilated. I was like wtf? Mutilated? I don't see myself that way. But she kept going on and on. The women are the worst. I feel like telling them to shut the fuck up because they're not even men. If men went around talking about women's inadequate vaginal care, there would be a feminist uprising.

I'm gay and I'm cut. I've been with both cut and uncut. Early in my sex life I avoided uncut guys because their dicks were almost always unclean and smelled gross. I'm sorry but it is always uncut guys who have that problem. Never been with a cut guy who had a gross smelling dick because they just don't have those folds of skin that trap stuff. With age, it has been easier to tell them the cleanliness I expect. I don't really objectify body parts. I think a dick with a nice shape and size looks good whether cut or uncut, but the man it's attached to matters more. The main thing I care about is cleanliness. Uncut dicks are fun to play with, but there can sometimes be a gross factor... the way they collect stuff underneath. Cut is harder to get off because you need lube as there isn't handy skin to roll over their dick head, but I haven't had many complaints. I myself am cut and I love my dick the way it is.

Guys who only have sex with uncut guys and reject all others are fucked in the head. They're no different than guys who won't date guys without muscle, or without a certain dick size, etc. Objectifying a body part has always been weird to me. I'm good in bed and if they won't be with me because I don't have a foreskin then their loss really. I understand fetishes and all that, and if it's purely about sex then I guess I understand, but not even dating and getting to know a guy who's cut is sub-human behaviour.
 
Last edited:
next, the nose and ears.

it's not mutilation, the nose and ears will still work without all that excess skin and cartilage.

ok that you don't think it's mutilation, but many of us that were mutilated as babies do think so.

they never asked me (or if they did, they didn't wait until i could answer)
 
90% of women, most of who are probably unashamedly pro-choice, so in reality they're not really pro-choice at all since they think men should be forced to convert to helmets when they're too young to consent. There is nothing pro-choice about forcing genital surgery on an infant for non-medical reasons. If someone wants to get their dick chopped up they can do it when they're old enough LULZ.

Let me first preface by saying that I think male circumcision is a stupid and barbaric practice. I am circumcized, my parents never thought twice about it because it was just what you did. Likewise, my good friend circumcized his son (recently), his reasoning was something vague about not wanting to have to explain why his penis was different from his son's when they were peeing next to each other. Which is a dumb reason, but anyway...

There is not some sort of weird sinister conspiracy about male circumcision. It is largely just a tradition that we, for some reason, haven't stopped yet. It's not like doctors are sitting there eagerly awaiting that tender, succulent baby foreskin as some posts have seemed to suggest. I think most parents don't think twice about it, because of a misguided idea that it's somehow healthy or the "right thing to do", or in many cases, even less thought goes into it than that (it's just what you do, and you never thought about why or question it). You seem to imply (in both of your most recent posts in here) that people are putting a lot of thought into it, or that it's a comparable choice to abortion. It isn't though, I think most people are just not really stopping to think about it. Until I started reading this thread, in fact, I never once even thought about the fact that I was circumcized or whether that would be something I would have chosen for myself, and I know my parents didn't, either. Nor did the doctor that did it; he was probably circumcized, too. I actually had no idea that's not just how penises looked until I was an adult.

I would prefer, in retrospect, to have not been circumcized, but if I hadn't read this thread I never once would have thought about it in my entire life, probably. And it doesn't negatively impact my life, I still enjoy sex plenty. I don't feel like a victim of mutilation. The only reason I'd ever think I was mutilated is because people in this thread try to tell me I was mutilated, some of you with a level of passion that shocks me.

I do think the practice should stop but reading this thread, one might think it's one step away from murder, and that doctors are jacking off over piles of baby foreskin while they cackle with glee. When in fact it's simply the perpetuation of a dumb tradition with its roots in religion, and few, if any, people practicing it, either doctors or parents, have anything resembling sinister intentions.
 
I don't agree with circumcision in general but I think the reaction to it is so over the top.

It's a loss, sure, but it's not a major loss. Unless a guy had a circumcision done badly, they aren't losing major functionality.

I wish people would stop acting like it's "mutilation" or the guy got his "dick chopped off". It's removal of a layer of skin... a useful layer, but not a layer that is so stupendously necessary for a fulfilling life. Most cut guys don't know there's a problem until some fanatic goes off on them about it. They're no more mutilated than someone who had their tonsils removed. I never had a problem with my body until I met my first anti-circumcision crusader, who was a woman of course; and she wanted to know how I felt about being mutilated. I was like wtf? Mutilated? I don't see myself that way. But she kept going on and on. The women are the worst. I feel like telling them to shut the fuck up because they're not even men. If men went around talking about women's inadequate vaginal care, there would be a feminist uprising.

I'm gay and I'm cut. I've been with both cut and uncut. Early in my sex life I avoided uncut guys because their dicks were almost always unclean and smelled gross. I'm sorry but it is always uncut guys who have that problem. Never been with a cut guy who had a gross smelling dick because they just don't have those folds of skin that trap stuff. With age, it has been easier to tell them the cleanliness I expect. I don't really objectify body parts. I think a dick with a nice shape and size looks good whether cut or uncut, but the man it's attached to matters more. The main thing I care about is cleanliness. Uncut dicks are fun to play with, but there can sometimes be a gross factor... the way they collect stuff underneath. Cut is harder to get off because you need lube as there isn't handy skin to roll over their dick head, but I haven't had many complaints. I myself am cut and I love my dick the way it is.

Guys who only have sex with uncut guys and reject all others are fucked in the head. They're no different than guys who won't date guys without muscle, or without a certain dick size, etc. Objectifying a body part has always been weird to me. I'm good in bed and if they won't be with me because I don't have a foreskin then their loss really. I understand fetishes and all that, and if it's purely about sex then I guess I understand, but not even dating and getting to know a guy who's cut is sub-human behaviour.
i loved your post almost choked me up and brought tears to my googley eyes , ty so much 🏳️‍🌈👏
 
I don't agree with circumcision in general but I think the reaction to it is so over the top.

It's a loss, sure, but it's not a major loss. Unless a guy had a circumcision done badly, they aren't losing major functionality.

I wish people would stop acting like it's "mutilation" or the guy got his "dick chopped off". It's removal of a layer of skin... a useful layer, but not a layer that is so stupendously necessary for a fulfilling life. Most cut guys don't know there's a problem until some fanatic goes off on them about it. They're no more mutilated than someone who had their tonsils removed. I never had a problem with my body until I met my first anti-circumcision crusader, who was a woman of course; and she wanted to know how I felt about being mutilated. I was like wtf? Mutilated? I don't see myself that way. But she kept going on and on. The women are the worst. I feel like telling them to shut the fuck up because they're not even men. If men went around talking about women's inadequate vaginal care, there would be a feminist uprising.

I'm gay and I'm cut. I've been with both cut and uncut. Early in my sex life I avoided uncut guys because their dicks were almost always unclean and smelled gross. I'm sorry but it is always uncut guys who have that problem. Never been with a cut guy who had a gross smelling dick because they just don't have those folds of skin that trap stuff. With age, it has been easier to tell them the cleanliness I expect. I don't really objectify body parts. I think a dick with a nice shape and size looks good whether cut or uncut, but the man it's attached to matters more. The main thing I care about is cleanliness. Uncut dicks are fun to play with, but there can sometimes be a gross factor... the way they collect stuff underneath. Cut is harder to get off because you need lube as there isn't handy skin to roll over their dick head, but I haven't had many complaints. I myself am cut and I love my dick the way it is.

Guys who only have sex with uncut guys and reject all others are fucked in the head. They're no different than guys who won't date guys without muscle, or without a certain dick size, etc. Objectifying a body part has always been weird to me. I'm good in bed and if they won't be with me because I don't have a foreskin then their loss really. I understand fetishes and all that, and if it's purely about sex then I guess I understand, but not even dating and getting to know a guy who's cut is sub-human behaviour.

well said my friend!
 
Let me first preface by saying that I think male circumcision is a stupid and barbaric practice. I am circumcized, my parents never thought twice about it because it was just what you did. Likewise, my good friend circumcized his son (recently), his reasoning was something vague about not wanting to have to explain why his penis was different from his son's when they were peeing next to each other. Which is a dumb reason, but anyway...

There is not some sort of weird sinister conspiracy about male circumcision. It is largely just a tradition that we, for some reason, haven't stopped yet. It's not like doctors are sitting there eagerly awaiting that tender, succulent baby foreskin as some posts have seemed to suggest. I think most parents don't think twice about it, because of a misguided idea that it's somehow healthy or the "right thing to do", or in many cases, even less thought goes into it than that (it's just what you do, and you never thought about why or question it). You seem to imply (in both of your most recent posts in here) that people are putting a lot of thought into it, or that it's a comparable choice to abortion. It isn't though, I think most people are just not really stopping to think about it. Until I started reading this thread, in fact, I never once even thought about the fact that I was circumcized or whether that would be something I would have chosen for myself, and I know my parents didn't, either. Nor did the doctor that did it; he was probably circumcized, too. I actually had no idea that's not just how penises looked until I was an adult.

I would prefer, in retrospect, to have not been circumcized, but if I hadn't read this thread I never once would have thought about it in my entire life, probably. And it doesn't negatively impact my life, I still enjoy sex plenty. I don't feel like a victim of mutilation. The only reason I'd ever think I was mutilated is because people in this thread try to tell me I was mutilated, some of you with a level of passion that shocks me.

I do think the practice should stop but reading this thread, one might think it's one step away from murder, and that doctors are jacking off over piles of baby foreskin while they cackle with glee. When in fact it's simply the perpetuation of a dumb tradition with its roots in religion, and few, if any, people practicing it, either doctors or parents, have anything resembling sinister intentions.

Great post. I especially wish that women would shut the fuck up about it. I mean, protect you own infants from circumcision... that's great. But don't run around talking about men's dicks like you know what it feels like. Fuck right off. This is a men's issue. I have sat in circles with men and had great conversations about it, very sobering. As soon as women get involved it turns nutso.

If I could turn back time I would love to still have my foreskin, but I don't, and my sex life has not suffered. A lot of guys have enjoyed this dick!
 
Great post. I especially wish that women would shut the fuck up about it. I mean, protect you own infants from circumcision... that's great. But don't run around talking about men's dicks like you know what it feels like. Fuck right off. This is a men's issue. I have sat in circles with men and had great conversations about it, very sobering. As soon as women get involved it turns nutso.

If I could turn back time I would love to still have my foreskin, but I don't, and my sex life has not suffered. A lot of guys have enjoyed this dick!
and men stop cutting women up, making the laws(women to sure too!) but men do some funked ass chest beating crap in the name religion etc, not contesting your view but men stop running around talking about vaj`s shape , size, preference of . so fuck right off! its a womans issue!! ( i dont care what gender speaks in any circle), soon as men get in pussy talk it goes nutzo, and alot of women have enjoyed this holland tunnel!! heres one for the good ol boys club:middle finger::boobies::middle finger: i might be gay but i love mens bodies, dangling elephant trunks or pink , brown or purple mushrooms!! and i feel pain for those that are traumatized, but i oddly hurt for women with their clits excised from age 5 to 20,and there vaginas opening stitch closed only to let menses flow crudely ,theres some trauma for you!!
 
Last edited:
mic drop` ow ow ow my foot! waits for the one upping, no really i wish for all to be pleased with body image and health because many suffer, and these societal issues with genital image are cray cray , IMHO
Waving Episode 9 GIF by The Simpsons
 
I’m salty I lost all those nerve endings. Not the end of the world tho

My future son will not be circumcised. He can choose to do it himself if he wants when he’s of age

Also a not so funny story…my best friend was born in a rural part of Central Asia. Like mountain nomads kind of rural. For some reason he was not circumcised until age 4 or so. He remembers it all vividly. No anesthesia, of course. A bunch of village elders just gathered around and snipped his hood…
 
and men stop cutting women up, making the laws(women to sure too!) but men do some funked ass chest beating crap in the name religion etc, not contesting your view but men stop running around talking about vaj`s shape , size, preference of . so fuck right off! its a womans issue!! ( i dont care what gender speaks in any circle), soon as men get in pussy talk it goes nutzo, and alot of women have enjoyed this holland tunnel!! heres one for the good ol boys club i might be gay but i love mens bodies, dangling elephant trunks or pink , brown or purple mushrooms!! and i feel pain for those that are traumatized, but i oddly hurt for women with their clits excised from age 5 to 20,and there vaginas opening stitch closed only to let menses flow crudely ,theres some trauma for you!!

Female circumcision and modification you describe are non-existent in North America and Europe. You can't even play tit for tat about that. Plus the female version is nothing like the male version. Male circumcision is still widespread.

As for aesthetics... you might disagree with men, but you don't have a right to say that men can't talk about the vaginal shapes they like, lol... anymore than I can tell someone who likes uncut dicks to like my cut dick. It's a pointless conversation.
 
Female circumcision and modification you describe are non-existent in North America and Europe. You can't even play tit for tat about that. Plus the female version is nothing like the male version. Male circumcision is still widespread.

As for aesthetics... you might disagree with men, but you don't have a right to say that men can't talk about the vaginal shapes they like, lol... anymore than I can tell someone who likes uncut dicks to like my cut dick. It's a pointless conversation.
i smell a hypocrite and perhaps dick cheese, whats pointless to you is just, uppity pious self serving junk just to trying to make yourself feel superior, did you re read your original post?Fuck off women this is a mans issue, au contraire mon frere and and as for females, well just know its by far worse to be circumcised as a female, youre just ignorant, penis obsessed in my opinion , seem you dont care for girls from EVERYWHERE on earth, and look at london ,,,,oh nevermind speaking to you about this. in your mind is just for males and pointless to conversate with me, i just spoke like you did in that asinine comment and cerebral fart of a reply and you didnt like it so i shall save my breath for a my blow up date , i wont piss on your parade but egypt , guinea. mali, somalia, sudan, and many many many many others have migrated all over most the world and dont practice GFM? dont tke their cultures with them? oh oh mister have you ever needed to open your eyes as and not think of just yourself, your pack mentality sucks big long hard
 
Last edited:
Top