^^^I believe that or maybe just the precursor itself being sold as is (as we see here and the analysis before.)
You also hit on my only drawback, how come the labs aren't seeing this... I still can't understand it either. But.. If Glubra had two samples come to him from one of the places supposedly known for good mdma and both showed the exact same 2,3-MDP2P glycidate I can only assume either something is getting missed or Glubra's analysis is off. I have faith though that the information he is presenting is correct, in which case these analysis labs are for some reason not catching it.
I'd be willing to bet 2,3-MDP2P glycidate has some activity that could be perceived as enjoyable by some, and the fact it's a solid that resembles mdma makes it hard to distinguish by both user and moron chemist who thinks he just successfully aminated some glycidate in a one pot.
Edit- 1,000th post! We sure do talk a lot lol.
-GC
You also hit on my only drawback, how come the labs aren't seeing this... I still can't understand it either. But.. If Glubra had two samples come to him from one of the places supposedly known for good mdma and both showed the exact same 2,3-MDP2P glycidate I can only assume either something is getting missed or Glubra's analysis is off. I have faith though that the information he is presenting is correct, in which case these analysis labs are for some reason not catching it.
I'd be willing to bet 2,3-MDP2P glycidate has some activity that could be perceived as enjoyable by some, and the fact it's a solid that resembles mdma makes it hard to distinguish by both user and moron chemist who thinks he just successfully aminated some glycidate in a one pot.
Edit- 1,000th post! We sure do talk a lot lol.
-GC
Last edited: