Crinklecut
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2005
- Messages
- 27
I agree with you Raver_zell it is not fair to be speculating on the cause of your friends death and it most certainly isnt fair placing blame on his friends or anyone for that matter.
I would hate to see a trashy newspaper like the courier mail quote some more speculation posted in a forum to sell more newspapers and make things worse for the family and friends of this man. my comments were made on my personal observations from the night written on the basis that it was a 'suspected overdose' as reported by the media in the article quoted in this thread. I apologise if my post offended the friends or family of this man in anyway.
On the note of Ravesafe not being at the event. I actually asked Harley (the rave co-ordinator) on the night if Ravesafe were at the event and he said he'd contacted Ravesafe about it but had chosen to go with the Paramedics because he had heard very good things about them. And in no way did the paramedics have the 'tough arse attitude on drugs' as you described. They certainly didnt condone drug use but as i mentioned before they were not judgmental and their main interest was in making sure everyone was alright. After they treated a certain person i know they even printed them off pages of information from the ravesafe website on the specific drug they had ingested and gave it to them to have a read of. very professional indeed.
However, I have never seen the Ravesafe team in action, just a brief encounter seeing them spraying people with water to cool them off at an event on a hot summers day. I do know they play a very important role in harm minimisation however I think it's unfair to speculate whether they could have prevented this death. The facts are whatever happened and for whatever reason this man has tragically died. And the speculation as to what caused or could have prevented his death appears to be causing his family and friends more grief.
Everybody is distressed by this mans death and everybody wants to know what happened to this fellow raver, and to be able to use this information to prevent it from happening to other ravers. But lets just wait for the expert’s results before we start jumping to conclusions of what should’ve, could’ve and would’ve happened.
I would hate to see a trashy newspaper like the courier mail quote some more speculation posted in a forum to sell more newspapers and make things worse for the family and friends of this man. my comments were made on my personal observations from the night written on the basis that it was a 'suspected overdose' as reported by the media in the article quoted in this thread. I apologise if my post offended the friends or family of this man in anyway.
zaineaol.nu said:INO - Regardless of the paramedics/first aid presence - thats not harm reduction - thats just being smart and duty of care. If groups like enlighten and Ravesafe were involved perhaps education would be provided more than 'you don't know what it'll do to you' scare tactic bullshit. We can't rule out that drugs caused this guys death - we can't rule out that perhaps it was a combination of a few drugs - nothing is certain - the fact is he's dead - and IMO this may well have been preventable.
On the note of Ravesafe not being at the event. I actually asked Harley (the rave co-ordinator) on the night if Ravesafe were at the event and he said he'd contacted Ravesafe about it but had chosen to go with the Paramedics because he had heard very good things about them. And in no way did the paramedics have the 'tough arse attitude on drugs' as you described. They certainly didnt condone drug use but as i mentioned before they were not judgmental and their main interest was in making sure everyone was alright. After they treated a certain person i know they even printed them off pages of information from the ravesafe website on the specific drug they had ingested and gave it to them to have a read of. very professional indeed.
However, I have never seen the Ravesafe team in action, just a brief encounter seeing them spraying people with water to cool them off at an event on a hot summers day. I do know they play a very important role in harm minimisation however I think it's unfair to speculate whether they could have prevented this death. The facts are whatever happened and for whatever reason this man has tragically died. And the speculation as to what caused or could have prevented his death appears to be causing his family and friends more grief.
Everybody is distressed by this mans death and everybody wants to know what happened to this fellow raver, and to be able to use this information to prevent it from happening to other ravers. But lets just wait for the expert’s results before we start jumping to conclusions of what should’ve, could’ve and would’ve happened.