• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Walter Cronkite: Telling the Truth About the War on Drugs

E-llusion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Messages
5,975
As anchorman of the CBS Evening News, I signed off my nightly broadcasts for nearly two decades with a simple statement: "And that's the way it is."

To me, that encapsulates the newsman's highest ideal: to report the facts as he sees them, without regard for the consequences or controversy that may ensue.

Sadly, that is not an ethic to which all politicians aspire - least of all in a time of war.

I remember. I covered the Vietnam War. I remember the lies that were told, the lives that were lost - and the shock when, twenty years after the war ended, former Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara admitted he knew it was a mistake all along.

Today, our nation is fighting two wars: one abroad and one at home. While the war in Iraq is in the headlines, the other war is still being fought on our own streets. Its casualties are the wasted lives of our own citizens.

I am speaking of the war on drugs.

And I cannot help but wonder how many more lives, and how much more money, will be wasted before another Robert McNamara admits what is plain for all to see: the war on drugs is a failure.

While the politicians stutter and stall - while they chase their losses by claiming we could win this war if only we committed more resources, jailed more people and knocked down more doors - the Drug Policy Alliance continues to tell the American people the truth - "the way it is."

I'm sure that's why you support DPA's mission to end the drug war. And why I strongly urge you to support their work by giving a generous donation today.

You see, I've learned first hand that the stakes just couldn't be higher.

When I wanted to understand the truth about the war on drugs, I took the same approach I did to the war in Vietnam: I hit the streets and reported the story myself. I sought out the people whose lives this war has affected.

Allow me to introduce you to some of them.

Nicole Richardson was 18-years-old when her boyfriend, Jeff, sold nine grams of LSD to undercover federal agents. She had nothing to do with the sale. There was no reason to believe she was involved in drug dealing in any way.

But then an agent posing as another dealer called and asked to speak with Jeff. Nicole replied that he wasn't home, but gave the man a number where she thought Jeff could be reached.

An innocent gesture? It sounds that way to me. But to federal prosecutors, simply giving out a phone number made Nicole Richardson part of a drug dealing conspiracy. Under draconian mandatory minimum sentences, she was sent to federal prison for ten years without possibility of parole.

To pile irony on top of injustice, her boyfriend - who actually knew something about dealing drugs - was able to trade information for a reduced sentence of five years. Precisely because she knew nothing, Nicole had nothing with which to barter.

Then there was Jan Warren, a single mother who lived in New Jersey with her teenage daughter. Pregnant, poor and desperate, Jan agreed to transport eight ounces of cocaine to a cousin in upstate New York. Police officers were waiting at the drop-off point, and Jan - five months pregnant and feeling ill - was cuffed and taken in.

Did she commit a crime? Sure. But what awaited Jan Warren defies common sense and compassion alike. Under New York's infamous Rockefeller Drug Laws, Jan - who miscarried soon after the arrest - was sentenced to 15 years to life. Her teenage daughter was sent away, and Jan was sent to an eight-by-eight cell.

In Tulia, Texas, an investigator fabricated evidence that sent more than one out of every ten of the town's African American residents to jail on trumped-up drug charges in one of the most despicable travesties of justice this reporter has ever seen.

The federal government has fought terminally ill patients whose doctors say medical marijuana could provide a modicum of relief from their suffering - as though a cancer patient who uses marijuana to relieve the wrenching nausea caused by chemotherapy is somehow a criminal who threatens the public.

People who do genuinely have a problem with drugs, meanwhile, are being imprisoned when what they really need is treatment.

And what is the impact of this policy?

It surely hasn't made our streets safer. Instead, we have locked up literally millions of people...disproportionately people of color...who have caused little or no harm to others - wasting resources that could be used for counter-terrorism, reducing violent crime, or catching white-collar criminals.

With police wielding unprecedented powers to invade privacy, tap phones and conduct searches seemingly at random, our civil liberties are in a very precarious condition.

Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent on this effort - with no one held accountable for its failure.

Amid the clichés of the drug war, our country has lost sight of the scientific facts. Amid the frantic rhetoric of our leaders, we've become blind to reality: The war on drugs, as it is currently fought, is too expensive, and too inhumane.

But nothing will change until someone has the courage to stand up and say what so many politicians privately know: The war on drugs has failed.

That's where the Drug Policy Alliance comes in.

From Capitol Hill to statehouses to the media, DPA counters the hysteria of the drug war with thoughtful, accurate analysis about the true dangers of drugs, and by fighting for desperately needed on-the-ground reforms.

They are the ones who've played the lead role in making marijuana legally available for medical purposes in states across the country.

California's Proposition 36, the single biggest piece of sentencing reform in theUnited States since the repeal of Prohibition, is the result of their good work. The initiative is now in its fifth year, having diverted more than 125,000 people from prison and into treatment since its inception.

They oppose mandatory-minimum laws that force judges to send people like Nicole Richardson and Jan Warren to prison for years, with no regard for their character or the circumstances of their lives. And their work gets results: thanks in large part to DPA, New York has taken the first steps towards reforming the draconian Rockefeller Drug Laws under which Jan was sentenced.

In these and so many other ways, DPA is working to end the war on drugs and replace it with a new drug policy based on science, compassion, health and human rights.

DPA is a leading, mainstream, respected and effective organization that gets real results.

But they can't do it alone.

That's why I urge you to send as generous a contribution as you possibly can to the Drug Policy Alliance.

Americans are paying too high a price in lives and liberty for a failing war on drugs about which our leaders have lost all sense of proportion. The Drug Policy Alliance is the one organization telling the truth. They need you with them every step of the way.

And that's the way it is.
----------------------------------------------------------

Walter Cronkite: Telling the Truth About the War on Drugs Walter Cronkite
Wed Mar 1, 8:39 PM ET

http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20060302/cm_huffpost/016605;_ylt=A86.I0ozmgZEGBsBwQr9wxIF;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--
 
yes and I can see from yer avatar why you asked that question, binky anyone?
 
^hahaha, and isnt it strange that we are trillions in debt, and every year we get 500 billion $$$ more indebt?


unfortunatly this will never reach a real mainstream audience :(
 
^^ Walter Cronkite is as mainstream as you can get (hence I posted this on FP)
 
Good article. I wish more prominent journalists would realize this.
 
Crazeee said:
^^ Walter Cronkite is as mainstream as you can get (hence I posted this on FP)

True dat... Cronkite has been bringin' it to our parents raw style for a long long time. People believe in him and the legitimacy of his opinion... I sent this to my whole family, even grandma...%)
 
Walter Cronkite IS JOURNALISM.

If anyone is going to get this out to the mass public, he is a likely candidate.
 
Errrl Yuuhh!
My boy Cronkite tellin it how it is... now you know that's right.

This makes me very happy to see such a popular figure in the public eye come out and make the bold statement everyone else is too cowardly or ignorant to make.

THE WAR ON DRUGS HAS FAILED MANY TIMES OVER.
 
themindlessone said:
Where the hell did he get 9 GRAMS of LSD?!?!?!

LOL, I know, of all the things mentioned in this article, THAT was the one that jumped out at me too... That's a LOT of acid!!!! 8(
 
Crazeee said:
Nicole Richardson was 18-years-old when her boyfriend, Jeff, sold nine grams of LSD to undercover federal agents. She had nothing to do with the sale. There was no reason to believe she was involved in drug dealing in any way.

But then an agent posing as another dealer called and asked to speak with Jeff. Nicole replied that he wasn't home, but gave the man a number where she thought Jeff could be reached.

An innocent gesture? It sounds that way to me. But to federal prosecutors, simply giving out a phone number made Nicole Richardson part of a drug dealing conspiracy. Under draconian mandatory minimum sentences, she was sent to federal prison for ten years without possibility of parole.

This is bullshit. There was reason to believe Nicole Richardson was involved in drug dealing. Mostly because she WAS involved. Nicole was convicted in the first place because she knew the caller was looking to purchase LSD from her boyfriend. Thus she was part of a conspiracy to sell LSD and rightfully convicted.

To me, that encapsulates the newsman's highest ideal: to report the facts as he sees them, without regard for the consequences or controversy that may ensue.

Sadly, that is not an ethic to which all politicians aspire - least of all in a time of war.

I agree with Walter Cronkite and his implications that mandatory minimums are wrong.

However, Walter Cronkite is doing the very thing he faults politicians and the government for doing when he selectively uses parts of the Nicole Richardson story and misuses facts in what amounts to anti-drug-war propaganda.

Then there was Jan Warren, a single mother who lived in New Jersey with her teenage daughter. Pregnant, poor and desperate, Jan agreed to transport eight ounces of cocaine to a cousin in upstate New York. Police officers were waiting at the drop-off point, and Jan - five months pregnant and feeling ill - was cuffed and taken in.

Did she commit a crime? Sure. But what awaited Jan Warren defies common sense and compassion alike. Under New York's infamous Rockefeller Drug Laws, Jan - who miscarried soon after the arrest - was sentenced to 15 years to life. Her teenage daughter was sent away, and Jan was sent to an eight-by-eight cell.

About a year ago, one of my friends began selling cocaine. I only recently even started talking to this person again now that they've stopped. I still have a lot of resentment towards her, though.

I remember arguing with her about how immoral and irresponsible it was all the time. I thought of it as being more like robbery than drug dealing. After a few months, a few of her "customers" were so hooked that they were basically giving her their paychecks before they earned them. A lot of them spent so much that they had absolutely nothing left in their savings accounts. One guy promised to sign over his entire next paycheck to her if she fronted him $400 worth, which she did. I remember him crying when she collected the paycheck from him. He was crying about how his electricity was going to be shut off and begged her to forgive the debt. Later that night he called her for a gram after conning a friend out of $100 he was supposed to use to pay his bills with. And she was glad to take his money.

I'm not saying addicts are innocent victims. I do feel like their dealers are victimizing them, I just don't think they're innocent.

So maybe Jan Warren thinks her sentence is unfair. But maybe it was unfair she was taking money, that in part, came from pathetic drug addicts who had lost all self-control. Maybe it was unfair that she was enabling people to destroy themselves.

Not to mention that she was about to bring a life into the world AND had a young daughter she was supposed to be caring for. She was knowingly commiting a felony. How unfair is that?

It surely hasn't made our streets safer. Instead, we have locked up literally millions of people...disproportionately people of color...

I am completely sick of racist implications regarding drug offenders.

The majority of drug arrests occur in urban areas. There are more drugs in urban areas. There are more users in urban areas. There are more open air drug markets in urban areas. There are more minorities in urban areas. Drug laws don't target minorities. It's simply easier to catch people for drug offenses in urban areas.

I know dozens of white people who have been arrested and convicted for drug violations. If the police catch you possessing or distributing drugs, you're going to be arrested. Police don't selectively enforce drug laws based on race, sorry.

I can't believe Walter Cronkite has sunk so low as to play the race card.

With police wielding unprecedented powers to invade privacy, tap phones and conduct searches seemingly at random, our civil liberties are in a very precarious condition.

The Patriot Act does not give police unprecedented powers to investigate people for drug crimes.

And as it stands, it still takes a significant amount of evidence for police to get warrants for phone taps and search warrants regarding drug investigations. I have a friend who had an issue with crack dealers from New York that came to set up shop in her rural town. He wanted to give the local police department information regarding these people. Only he ended up having to become an informant because they couldn't use the anonymous tips in court or to secure warrants. And although she gave them lots of information, they were actually more interested in users and smaller dealers at first - so they could use them as witnesses in court and build strong cases against the big dealers my friend provided information on (many of whom were taking in close to $5000- $10,000 in profits a week).

National drug policy has nothing to do with our civil liberties being threatened as a casualty of the War on Terror. And the War on Terror has nothing to do with drug policy.

Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent on this effort - with no one held accountable for its failure.

Amid the clichés of the drug war, our country has lost sight of the scientific facts. Amid the frantic rhetoric of our leaders, we've become blind to reality: The war on drugs, as it is currently fought, is too expensive, and too inhumane.

I agree with all of this. But I don't understand why Walter Cronkite couldn't have backed it up without misleading statements and hysteria.

But if our policies aren't based on rational arguments and reason, we will NEVER have rational and reasonable policies.

From Capitol Hill to statehouses to the media, DPA counters the hysteria of the drug war with thoughtful, accurate analysis about the true dangers of drugs, and by fighting for desperately needed on-the-ground reforms.

If the DPA is anything like Walter Cronkite, they're no better than the people they're countering.

In these and so many other ways, DPA is working to end the war on drugs and replace it with a new drug policy based on science, compassion, health and human rights.

The DPA only has ending criminal penalties for marijuana listed as a goal. This is as opposed to ending criminal penalties for all drugs. And this contradicts their mission statement:

"The Drug Policy Alliance envisions a just society in which the use and regulation of drugs are grounded in science, compassion, health and human rights, in which people are no longer punished for what they put into their own bodies but only for crimes committed against others, and in which the fears, prejudices and punitive prohibitions of today are no more."

So that's nice. The DPA would gladly give me clean needles, but apparently won't fight for the end of criminal penalties regarding the heroin I'd need the needles for.

If they really stood by their mission statement, they'd work to end criminal penalties for consenting adults regarding ALL drugs.
 
Top