speedballs_over
Bluelighter
I've noticed a big increase in the number of people on here discussing Vivitrol [i.e., naltrexone formulations, the new extended release injection is a newer formulation taking on an old trade name]
This compound is not the same as the active compound in Narcan, that compound is naloxone as the HCl salt. They are both full antagonists. They are not identical, naloxone is major tool for harm reduction in the form of an extremely effective OD reversal agent. Naltrexone is more of a pharmaceutical in the sense of being used for longer term treatment.
Naltrexonoe has been around for a long time. I see that the manufacturer of Vivitrol has a newer web site up. My guess is there's a new marketing push to use this compound to "treat" opioid dependence.
This compound has been used in various forms for decades without gaining much traction. There's very probably a good reason why.
I'd like to hear from someone who has gone the naltrexone route and now has a year or more of abstinence from all opioids. What was the experience like? Would you recommend it to others?
Is anyone who is starting naltrexone in the near future going to be having the older implant formulation? I'm curious if treatment programs are still pushing the implants.
I recall many "overnight detox" programs - another terrible failure and one that killed a few people at least - used naloxone/naltrexone preparations to induce precipitated withdrawals while the subject was unconscious. Those detox programs were often described as hell or worse, and I don't hear much about them anymore here in the US. I suspect this is just another round of pharma trying to push naltrexone to unsuspecting physicians who want to cash in on the wave of addiction treatment. Cynical... perhaps.
What I don't get is why anyone would allow themselves to be injected with this shit, other than out of desperation to have a blockade of some sort. I'd understand that desperation, for sure, but to choose naltrexone (or any full agonist)? I usually have seen this compound used in coercive programs like in-patient re-habs and court ordered programs. Voluntarily? I think that would be a new trend (other than the previous use of antagonists in "overnight detox" cocktails). I'm guessing it's pharmaceutical company marketing, and will - again - prove to be an unpopular, ineffective treatment over the longterm. Sure, some will find it useful and have success with it, but if history is any predictor it will fail to match agonist/partial agonist medicated therapy in long term efficacy, as measured by sustained no/minimal relapse to illicitly obtained opioids.
I've known people - more than a few and personally - that have ripped out naltrexone implants, but none recently. That was more of a 2000s thing. Can't really rip out the bolus injection. That'll ensure more "success stories" but will they be genuine, will it prove effective and popular as a treatment? Or will it be again revealed to be a hellish way to treat oneself in the wake of opioid dependence.
Not at all an attack on anyone choosing this option for dealing with opioid dependency, I just don't get it. More so I'm worried about this trend of pushing full antagonists to treat people with serious cravings and nasty habits.
I'm a decade into recovery from IV heroin, used methadone and still take a modest does of bupe. I work in harm reduction and where I work we generally regard naltrexone as poison and any medical professional who would suggest it as treatment to be either naive or dismissive of opioid dependency as a serious mental disorder. We'd never tell someone not to try it if they wanted to, but if they ask we sure as hell warn them about how they may fell after having the shot. We deal with a lot of emotionally unstable people and people with mental health co-morbidities along with opioid dependency.
It's my belief that naltrexone may exasperate the depression that often follows from opioid abstinence in those who are dependent and generally cause a prolonged PAWs type syndrome.
This compound is not the same as the active compound in Narcan, that compound is naloxone as the HCl salt. They are both full antagonists. They are not identical, naloxone is major tool for harm reduction in the form of an extremely effective OD reversal agent. Naltrexone is more of a pharmaceutical in the sense of being used for longer term treatment.
Naltrexonoe has been around for a long time. I see that the manufacturer of Vivitrol has a newer web site up. My guess is there's a new marketing push to use this compound to "treat" opioid dependence.
This compound has been used in various forms for decades without gaining much traction. There's very probably a good reason why.
I'd like to hear from someone who has gone the naltrexone route and now has a year or more of abstinence from all opioids. What was the experience like? Would you recommend it to others?
Is anyone who is starting naltrexone in the near future going to be having the older implant formulation? I'm curious if treatment programs are still pushing the implants.
I recall many "overnight detox" programs - another terrible failure and one that killed a few people at least - used naloxone/naltrexone preparations to induce precipitated withdrawals while the subject was unconscious. Those detox programs were often described as hell or worse, and I don't hear much about them anymore here in the US. I suspect this is just another round of pharma trying to push naltrexone to unsuspecting physicians who want to cash in on the wave of addiction treatment. Cynical... perhaps.
What I don't get is why anyone would allow themselves to be injected with this shit, other than out of desperation to have a blockade of some sort. I'd understand that desperation, for sure, but to choose naltrexone (or any full agonist)? I usually have seen this compound used in coercive programs like in-patient re-habs and court ordered programs. Voluntarily? I think that would be a new trend (other than the previous use of antagonists in "overnight detox" cocktails). I'm guessing it's pharmaceutical company marketing, and will - again - prove to be an unpopular, ineffective treatment over the longterm. Sure, some will find it useful and have success with it, but if history is any predictor it will fail to match agonist/partial agonist medicated therapy in long term efficacy, as measured by sustained no/minimal relapse to illicitly obtained opioids.
I've known people - more than a few and personally - that have ripped out naltrexone implants, but none recently. That was more of a 2000s thing. Can't really rip out the bolus injection. That'll ensure more "success stories" but will they be genuine, will it prove effective and popular as a treatment? Or will it be again revealed to be a hellish way to treat oneself in the wake of opioid dependence.
Not at all an attack on anyone choosing this option for dealing with opioid dependency, I just don't get it. More so I'm worried about this trend of pushing full antagonists to treat people with serious cravings and nasty habits.
I'm a decade into recovery from IV heroin, used methadone and still take a modest does of bupe. I work in harm reduction and where I work we generally regard naltrexone as poison and any medical professional who would suggest it as treatment to be either naive or dismissive of opioid dependency as a serious mental disorder. We'd never tell someone not to try it if they wanted to, but if they ask we sure as hell warn them about how they may fell after having the shot. We deal with a lot of emotionally unstable people and people with mental health co-morbidities along with opioid dependency.
It's my belief that naltrexone may exasperate the depression that often follows from opioid abstinence in those who are dependent and generally cause a prolonged PAWs type syndrome.
Last edited: