yeah, but what's missing here is the very realistic option of being employed in an industry that doesn't drug test.
in australia, at least, this is still a possibility for most of us. it's not something we should be resigned to - in fact, it's what the propaganda machine wants you to think:
"if you take drugs you will have no job, no earnings, no material possessions, no love, no support"
i'm a functioning drug addict with a full-time job and an amazingly loving relationship. i'm sure i'm not alone, either. i'm not rich but i'm pretty happy with how much i earn.
when people say things along the lines of "i'd quit drugs for a really high paying job" i think...well, some prostitutes earn a hell of lot of money too, but there are some compromises i'm not willing to make for more money.
i know a lot of people benefit greatly from working for mining companies or whatever institutions implement drug mandatory drug testing. set themselves up for life and all that.
and for many, many folk, passing a drug test requires absolutely no effort - not a second thought.
and good luck to 'em. good for them.
it's great that some kids are on the straight-and-narrow. not my bag, but who am i to judge?
thing is, i'm not prepared to give my wonderful lifestyle up for any amount of money. my choice to have drug-infused piss is
not for sale!
you get drug tested by the mining companies even if you scrub their toilets or work in their city offices thousands of kilometres from a mine site. fuck that.
the thing mandatory drug testing in employment does is cast out all of the people that are otherwise able to work
just fine with drugs in their system.
it is really fucking cold and unethical. it means people end up unemployed, ostracised, on their own.
sure, people who operate heavy machinery or make life-or-death decisions shouldn't be high on drugs at work. that makes sense, fair enough. if you work in a position that could threaten your life or the lives of others if you are impaired, then you should be sober.
but this idea that it is ok to implement a urine-testing witch hunt to see what metabolites are in
all workers' urine is one of the most disturbing violations of human rights that is tolerated in so-called civilised nations.
it seems to be accepted and increasingly widespread in the united states.
what it says is that you're not allowed to be employed and contribute to society if you happen to enjoy substances that are not part of the accepted few (tobacco, alcohol, big pharma mandated medical prescriptions). even if you're an otherwise responsible, law abiding citizen, you're suddenly a criminal; shunned and outed to the world.
australians should not welcome the creeping acceptance of workplace drug testing.
it creates an underclass of people - it says "if you take drugs you are not allowed to belong (to eat, clothe, support yourself by earning an honest living) in our society whether you are a functioning, responsible, contributing member or not".
smoke your ciggies, drink your booze - hell, take these anti-depressants or sleeping pills - but don't you dare consume the 'shunned substances' or you yourself shall be shunned. then you're going to have to steal, deal or scam to keep a roof above your head, to feed your family and/or feed your habit.
no compassion, no help - just a scolding nanny state/police state. suddenly you are pushed to commit
real crime - and then the police have a reason to exist. the self-serving industry of prohibition - you need a police force to save you from the laid-off office workers who got caught with a bit of cannabis in their systems and are forced to commit property crimes to survive.
the drug war really is a war. the victims are virtually all innocent civilians.
now, to further politicise this rant, i will say that the only way we will be able to save ourselves from this fate (because everyone knows we follow every american folly - especially those proven to fail) is to have strong workplace regulation in favour of the workers.
they'll tell you that we need to change workplace rights to make australia more competitive in the global economy or some shit. they'll erode our rights any way they can - and this is one of them. they'll tell you that the poor little fragile, vulnerable employers can't afford to give us protection. it's protection or jobs, they'll say - your choice, folks.
they've done it before, they'll do it again and they'll keep trying at any given opportunity.
eroding workplace rights means that more employers are able to "screen their workforce" this way. don't be fooled by the major party politicians - they'll sell our rights up before we even realise what they are. they're bankrolled by the same people that test your piss before they'll let you scrub their toilet, and they reckon it's a pretty good system. obviously the corporate donors have more influence than you or i.
it's fucked and we shouldn't stand for it. not even implicitly - fuck the drug war. they want to buy our rights with supposedly good salaries. they want us to accept that kind of shit - and once we accept it, it's good enough for everyone.
if you want my piss, you can fucking well piss off.
[end rant]