SixBuckets
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
- Messages
- 1,222
The OP wants to know if the meds will change their identity, which is what some people refer to as a soul - the core self. There are many ways people interpret who they really are - for example their occupation, their body type, personality, who they have sex with, etc. Neuroleptics such as risperidone destroy the limbic system and are often referred to as chemical lobotomies.
No they don't, at least not more than any other substance you might put in your body if you were the kind of person to visit a drug related harm reduction forum.
After taking neuroleptics people feel like zombies or robots - no emotions, no personality, no motivation, no pleasure.
The majority of people who take antipsychotic medication experience no side effects. Emotional blunting, as I said above, is a side effect. It doesn't happen to everyone and it doesn't happen with every medication.
I find it goes against harm reduction principles to tell people "if one med does not work you can always try another" (the mantra of the mental health industry at the moment it seems). The side effects from such meds are highly detrimental and often permanent.
The vast majority of medication side effects go away when you discontinue the drug.
Every time you try a new med you acquire more negative side effects which cannot be cured.
This is demonstrably false.
My advice would be to quit psychedelics and especially RC's. Stop smoking and drinking if you do. Focus on healing your brain naturally. This may occur if you give your own brain a chance by improving BDNF levels. Consume antioxidants (eg. green tea), get fresh air, exercise, eat fresh vegetables. Avoid saturated fats, high fructose corn syrups, refined sugars and stress. After 12 - 24 months you should be feeling much better. You won't feel much improvement straight away, just try to focus on each improvement as you notice it. Keeping a journal may help you with this.
I'm absolutely staggered that you're accusing other people of giving irresponsible advice when you're telling people to treat psychosis with green tea and fresh vegetables.
Look sixbuckets, I like you, but this post is nothing but an attempt to invalidate my experience.
I'm glad you like me. I have no firm opinion on you, but I appreciate the sentiment. I'm not sure why your post is so passively aggressively hostile, but it's a sensitive topic. I'm not invalidating your experience, though - I'm putting it in context.
Most of the regular posters have a lot of faith in psychiatry and often tout the benefits of psych drugs. My post was in the spirit of HR, which is the purpose of this forum.
I don't think it's harm reduction to tell people experiencing mental illness that if they take the medication prescribed for them by the doctor they will lose their emotions and want to kill themselves.
I also feel that my post was relatively balanced, and as you failed to pat me on the back for that, I will take care of that for you now.![]()
That was actually pretty funny.

I recently found out my mom was taking xanax for a few weeks behind my back so you are not the only one that gets annoyed by my strong feelings about this stuff. Admittedly, my withdrawal form these drugs was shading my judgement and I am working on adjusting my approach so I can get my important message heard. One thing I have noticed about the people that fluff this stuff is that you act like someone's negative experience is a rare occurrence and is some freak reaction. It may be a minority of patients but certainly not insignificant.
You're right that it's not insignificant - awareness of side effects and potential negative reactions should be a part of everyone's informed decision whether or not to take medication. I completely support that. But negative experiences with medication that are as severe as what you're describing are a rare occurrence. It's irresponsible and dangerous to tell people these experiences are the inevitable result of treating their condition pharmacologically.
As far as side effects are concerned, statistical probabilities will mean jack shit for you if you find yourself confined to a wheel chair from TD.
Then you might as well stay in your house and never cross the road. Oh, wait, there's a slight statistical probability someone will drive a car into your house while you're in it, or that it might catch fire and burn down.
We all make decisions based on our assessment of how likely negative outcomes are all the time. This is part of being an adult human.
You seem to have a lot of faith in the ways that these substances make it to market.
I'm a pretty firm believer in the scientific method, statistical analysis of population health data and the academic peer review process, yes. I definitely have a lot more faith in those systems than in the 'internet horror story from individuals who universalise their experience' method.
I certainly do not and I don't trust pharmaceutical companies or the FDA at all and again, I have my own valid reasons for that.
There's trusting pharmaceutical companies and then there's being a conspiracy theorist about data on medication efficacy and side effect prevalence being essentially fraudulent.
Have a nice day.![]()
I'm having a great day! I hope you are too.
