ah, so you're just wildly extrapolating based on a tiny, personal sample. thanks for confirming my suspicions.I don't want to cite the particular places and people involved, but that's how it was.
alasdair
ah, so you're just wildly extrapolating based on a tiny, personal sample. thanks for confirming my suspicions.I don't want to cite the particular places and people involved, but that's how it was.
My beef is mainly about what is going on the hiring process. I always knew better than to mess with HR if I had a problem. I threaten to kick people's asses and/or take them to court when I have a problem. It doesn't earn me raises, but it keeps backbiting monkeys of my fucking back!
no wonder you support unemployment discrimination. i'd rather hire a monkey than sue happy tough guy.
No prospective employers know anything about me. I've never been fired. I stood up for myself in a couple of shitty minimum wage jobs that nobody knows would even exist. I wasn't a rich boy and daddy didn't provide great social connections for me, so I had it rough. Trust me, nobody gives me a bad review because I never was the bad guy in any situation.
The problem is that my individually tailored cover letters and resumes that were proofread and contained zero mistakes were likely never even read because some horny hiring manager wants to staff his office with vagina in hopes he can get some leverage on his wife by getting a blowjob in the office.
Do you and ali have anything constructive to say or do you want to have a shit talking battle?
no, i agree with a lot of what you're saying about HR. but the bottom line is, people check references and do background checks. if it comes up that you sued one of your employers, or got fired for being a tough guy, you're not going to get the job. at least, you're not going to get a good job.
me and my boss tell each other to fuck off like 5 times a day. then we usually just hug it out.
if you're going to populate your responses with ridiculous generalisations, it's hardly shit-talking to both point that out and ask you to back up your claims with some substantiation.Do you and ali have anything constructive to say or do you want to have a shit talking battle?
In the mid-atlantic and southern US, it seems to divide heavily along gender lines. Sometimes it's difficul to even find out who is in the HR dept, but when I do, it's still coming up as all female, and this is especially true in higher education.
I spoke to one of my old professors yesterday and I asked him if he was once on a hiring committee, and he was. He said that the HR dept. head (was a female too, but that's beside the point) did do the initial screening and that it was ridiculous. The committe had her go and dig out her rejected applicants and they chose a great person from this stack.
I think I would rather deal with some real people and real managers to get hired rather than an HR. HR's are like chicks on online dating sites it seems who are just reading the first line, going with some magic gut feeling and tossing. If she's religious, you can get approved to the next level by saying you love Christ in your opening sentence. Individual whims can get ridiculous and they aren't going deep at all for these initial screenings. HR doesn't have to depend on these people so why should they give a shit?
That's absurd and believe it or not, that is sexist. There are instances of bigger and stronger people being able to handle certain jobs better etc. but that doesn't always break on gender lines either. The largest part of the gender disparities is sexism and homosocial discrimination. There is no good reason why men are not being hired in staff and HR jobs. Must you believe in the myth of the confident, self-assured male who takes the lead and the female who submits and serves behind the scenes? You've made many posts in SLR that makes it clear that men who do not follow this stereotype have no sexual worth to you, and perhaps you can't imagine a man in a traditionally female held staff position either? How bout imagining a female bulldozer operator? Women can do that job just as well as any man.
I know it is frustrating when all they go by is a resume and cover letter to filter through the applicants. Try to imagine how difficult it must be to be in HR and read (or skim) 300 applications for like 10 positions. It would take a long ass time to interview all 300 applicants. They have to screen applicants somehow just to have time to interview the "good" ones. I'm not defending them, I'm just stating how I believe it to work. The implications of all this is that you have to play the game and by their rules. You have to have solid references. You have to make a resume/cover letter that stands out from the rest. If your resume is too long....trim it down. If your resume is too concise....beef it up.
Yes you are right that I am interested in dating a guy who is confident.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/busin...int-of-hr-again/2007/11/16/1195321760466.htmlThe Australian Human Resources Institute study found that 45.9% of HR managers either believed HR was not effective, or they were unsure about it. Nearly three-quarters of non-HR people had the same view.
Indeed, 80.4% of non-HR respondents had little understanding of what HR managers did to justify their existence.
It's not like your cover letter is going to be the next blockbuster novel. Maybe writing about hedonistic sex a la Shades of Grey will get that resume "noticed."
If 300 applicants are applying for one position, there's a serious unemployment/under-employment/job-hopping crisis going on, and I would not mind if the government intervened here.
But really, you never know what's in the mind of an HR person and what they are choosing to throw out. The rules and regulations to a radio station give-away contest are laid out more clearly than any hiring policy - if there even is a "policy."
Most likely, the big criteria they are looking for is "previous experience" doing the same exact job. Experience is hardly everything, and may very well account for nothing. In this economy, young people aren't going to "break into" shit.
"Trying to make yourself stand out" is no solution to the hiring crisis. Besides, you don't know what you are getting in that honeymoon phase either. It's all corporate culture bullshit that places the blame on ultra high under and unemployment on the job seeker.
How long does it take you to make such a serious judgement about a man's personality? Have you been right everytime?
It makes me wonder what these women in HR are up to? Are they treating it like some reality show dating game? Are they bringing their female dating "skills" into the picture?
No man or woman has telepathic ability that I know of. There has got to be a better process for evaluating people rather than the "gut-feelling" and snap judgement based on a shitty cover letter and resume. Cover letters and resumes just make me want to puke. It's disgusting American culture at its worst!
I wasn't asking for help or advice on how to try to slither into the corrupt structure of American corporate culture. I'm here to have a discussion, and a large part of that discussion includes complaining!
People need to quit trying to affably ride this bullshit dick statue and say hey...this sucks!