• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Social Justice White/Straight/Cis/Male Privilege

iu


you meant height right?
 
White males are placed in an oppressive situation when they aren't allowed to rule their own... When they're supposed to accept Muslim legislators because "democracy and multiculturalism rules"... Including Muslim women whose own prophet says they shouldn't be in power.

There are many many ways in which white males are laid on them oppressive expectations. They're expected to sacrifice their identity... For the rest of the world. To accept it as just another interchangable one. That every other race/people deserves a place there. What their ancestors genes sacrificed for and built - that you're a racist if you don't want 99% of the people to be not you're own.... And we can't even talk about our concerns really, in a forum where such a topic is brought up. That others are different and what they want will be different. Or will conflict.

And all conflict is our fault. All blame is ours. All the reason why the brown and black haven't succeeded as societies the same as whites, is white people being mean to them. Pay up! Shake down the white man!

Can't even talk about this without getting banned. There are so many reasons.

They're oppressed because the expectation of the "society" of the modern world, is that they aren't even a recognized people with interests separate from any others. White people aren't allowed, at least openly, to put their own race/nation first (not that I think an individual can't join other nations/groups, or that absolute 'racism' is good...but this is complicated). If they do that, images of Nazis come to mind!

And then we have Jewish intellectuals who show any man with half a brain that that whole thing wasn't black and white, but they're allowed to openly attempt to deconstruct and destroy (and dismiss) our identity and we let them now... But insert black or Jew (or Muslim) in exchange for white in anything these men say...

EB48u2gX4AEAcLa.jpg


pa-ignatiev2.jpg
 
Last edited:
White men aren't even allowed to advocate for Germany to stay German without being ostracized and called a "racist" by many in mainstream society... BY THEIR OWN SO-CALLED GOVERNMENT!

Maybe they are ("racist"), but that term definitely shouldn't be holding the power that it does over them. That's another: They're the group that words like that have so much power over.

Whites are under attack.

 
White males are placed in an oppressive situation when they aren't allowed to rule their own... When they're supposed to accept Muslim legislators because "democracy and multiculturalism rules"...

supposed to accept? what does that mean?

do you mean when muslim candidates are legally and democratically elected by their constituents?

do you think that muslim candidates should be banned from running for office so that white males don't have to accept their being elected?

alasdair
 
supposed to accept? what does that mean?

do you mean when muslim candidates are legally and democratically elected by their constituents?

do you think that muslim candidates should be banned from running for office so that white males don't have to accept their being elected?

alasdair

We're expected to accept that it is okay. That it is in our interests. I don't.

I think the founding fathers were only thinking white people would live here, basically. Not that they were completely ignorant to the fact of other groups existing here, such as Indians (Native Americans) of various sorts, but they didn't imagine it would become a "melting pot", not that it really has, for the entire world.

Quran 5:51 said:
O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya' (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya', then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust).

I don't think the founding fathers really knew what they were talking about with "freedom of religion", or, they really only thought white people would be immigrating here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh I really don't mind getting banned. We are not the same. White males (females too) aren't even "allowed" to have an identity that is positive (separate, distinct from every other land and people on earth), without including EVERYONE including those who hate them...

They are denied the right that is given to every poor Tibetan, every Black, every Kurd, every Jew, every-one else... The right to a separate identity (or respect, of their identity, their place), the right to go their own direction. To orient and defend themself.
 
Last edited:
Oh hey Alasdair you just told me I don't accept what I don't believe to be true as true! Good for you! Such an intellectual powerhouse with that language!

You hate us, if you are them. I'm merely defending my ground.

Quran 5:51 said:
O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya' (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya', then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust).

Again, you are FREE to feel whatever you feel about us, but we're expected to just stomach it, constantly... Or, to trust you (them). Just trust you! Or else (bigot, racist, etc., none of you have a real argument).
 
i didn’t tell you anything of the sort. you may have inferred it but you seem to make a lot of erroneous assumptions.

alasdair
 
White people: That car that people try to steal scrap metal from. And they get a few dollars to eat, but now the car no longer runs.

Noel Ignatiev and Tim Wise are Jewish catalytic converter thieves.
 
@What 23

The problem with your ideology (as presented here) is this: even if you're right and Islam is evil or Jews want to eradicate white people, you ironically - through your hateful defense - have become just as bad as anybody you could possibly be criticizing.

I'm not going to call you a white supremacist because that term is thrown around too loosely. I agree that you are not allowed to be proud of being white, relative to any other color. I agree that white people are unfairly blamed for the world's problems... but you can't allow that resentment to fester into hate.

The content of your posts in this thread is, essentially, "People are racist against whites." But, the tone of your posts is racist (or, hatefully antisemitic / Islamophobic).

I don't like Islam, at all. I think it is without a doubt the most dangerous and toxic mainstream religion to ever exist on the face of the planet, but I am well aware of the fact that there are more good Muslim people than bad. Similarly, white nations have committed atrocities. But nobody (really) is saying that makes your average white man bad.

You posted carefully selected quotes from random people. I can provide you with anti-Islam quotes. I can provide you with antisemitic quotes. I can provide you with anti-black quotes, anti-Asian quotes, anti-Indian quotes, etc.

We are not the only ones who are hated upon.
 
Last edited:
hm. I can't find the post I was going to respond to but basically yeah there is legalized discrimination against whites now and I guess some people don't want to see it because they haven't [knowingly] experienced it first-hand yet.

it has gradually crept in over the past decade and "white privilege" is the fig leaf that makes it socially acceptable. this would explain the push to have us accept that we're inherently privileged (and racist), because if we accept that then we also accept that it's "fair" to discriminate against us.

again though, this is all just wealthy people (and sycophantic ideologues) trying to divide us for their own benefit. for example:

Whole Foods employs roughly 95,000 people nationwide. Data collected in the heat map suggest that stores with low racial and ethnic diversity, especially those located in poor communities, are more likely to unionize.


Just part of a pattern for Amazon:


Americans are no doubt familiar with Pinkerton’s brutal, bloody history strikebreaking during the [first] Gilded Age.

In America, the wealthy can use the velvet glove because people can be fed the diversity and privilege propaganda. In ethnically-homogeneous Poland they can’t play that card so instead the iron fist (Pinkerton) emerges.

This is the real reason why it’s so important to have us all believe white privilege exists, because disenfranchised white people don't form labour unions that threaten the wealth/power/influence of the megalomaniacs that wish to rule the world.
 
this would explain the push to have us accept that we're inherently privileged (and racist), because if we accept that then we also accept that it's "fair" to discriminate against us.

Uhh, no.

Believing white people are privileged in absolutely no way requires by extension believing that it's OK to discriminate against white people. That's crap.
 
Top