Hell, most LGBT people I know are fairly indifferent towards kids.
You should have stopped at this point in your post, for it encapsulates the problem in a nutshell. That indifference is what sets you apart the heterosexual parents and those who have a vested interest in seeing children become even greater than the previous generation, because
your ideological worldview is coming
before children.. which is inherently contradictory to the natural order and the inherent directive of mammalian life.
This mentality spills over into many of the ruling class types and politicians too, many of whom are also childless and in many cases homosexual or even paedophiles. They have no love for children except for what children can do for them, a complete inversion of the natural order. You're the second poster now who has conflated the 'Won't somebody please think of the children' trope espoused by the ruling class types, who hide behind it for political purposes, with the very real natural order and derived from that one of the most important moral positions any sane human being holds, which is the well-being of children. Just because the ruling class have besmirched it does not mean the underlying moral premise is without merit.
And this dovetails into a wider point, about politics and psychology. You can not vote social edicts and mandate healthy psychology based on ideology, that is putting the cart before the horse. It's one of the prime reasons why so many people are mentally troubled, generally, and the rates continue to increase. It's because through the 20th century people have divorced themselves from real psychology, real human nature, believing they can simply vote things to be the way they feel, not what is actually the natural order of things. And, naturally, more and more people are running into a brick wall and hurting themselves as a result.
One the reasons why this even happened in the first place was because, as you alluded to with the 'Helen Lovejoy' quip, people (rightly) tried to move away from prudish and overbearing Christian value systems. The mistake that was made was assuming that
all the positions of the Christian (and other faiths) regarding sexuality and moral points were erroneous, when in fact on proper examination it will be found that actually many of the points raised in those texts have demonstrable psychological roots based upon generations of observation of human behaviours - however faulty the translation or preaching of it thousands of years down the line. And I say that as someone with no affinity or love for Christianity (or any religion).
