consumer
Bluelighter
I would say when you use an id that perhaps all other govt issued or recorded id's are linked. That would not be hard for them to do.
anyways, given my situation, i believe i can taper off, i have decent stocks and have a holiday targetted where i was going to taper off anyway. can someone give advice for my situation? a good counselor, subs even? im in NSW if that makes a difference.
HeyIf I were you, I'd find myself a good pharmacist who is open-minded, and talk to them. Then just stick with that pharmacy. It is really easy to put a note in the dispensing software to say not to sell codeine to a particular patient (it'll only be visible at that pharmacy), but normally the S3 sale process doesn't involve the dispensing software, so it might not be noticed. MedsASSIST allows you to enter notes as well, but I'm not actually certain that these come up when someone else enters the license number. It's a pretty good idea though (as an opt-in system obviously) so I might actually make that suggestion. I'm really interested in finding ways for pharmacies to become more involved in harm minimisation, possibly as access points to other resources such as drug & alcohol counselling, regular counselling, drug information etc.
Edit to add: The ethics of the MedsASSIST program is tricky, because I really do understand that people want and need privacy. I also know that anyone in the midst of an addiction is likely to despise the program...I guess I wonder if people do appreciate that kind of monitoring once they're on the other side, like you do? The other thing I would hate is for OTC codeine to become unavailabe, and for everyone to just switch to using something else - what's the point of that? What I'd love to see is more resources available to people who are having a shitty time, BEFORE they get addicted to anything i.e. trying to minimise use that stems from other problems (mental health or otherwise). I feel like that might work a lot better than trying to catch people once they are using.
HeyIf I were you, I'd find myself a good pharmacist who is open-minded, and talk to them. Then just stick with that pharmacy. It is really easy to put a note in the dispensing software to say not to sell codeine to a particular patient (it'll only be visible at that pharmacy), but normally the S3 sale process doesn't involve the dispensing software, so it might not be noticed. MedsASSIST allows you to enter notes as well, but I'm not actually certain that these come up when someone else enters the license number. It's a pretty good idea though (as an opt-in system obviously) so I might actually make that suggestion. I'm really interested in finding ways for pharmacies to become more involved in harm minimisation, possibly as access points to other resources such as drug & alcohol counselling, regular counselling, drug information etc.
Edit to add: The ethics of the MedsASSIST program is tricky, because I really do understand that people want and need privacy. I also know that anyone in the midst of an addiction is likely to despise the program...I guess I wonder if people do appreciate that kind of monitoring once they're on the other side, like you do? The other thing I would hate is for OTC codeine to become unavailabe, and for everyone to just switch to using something else - what's the point of that? What I'd love to see is more resources available to people who are having a shitty time, BEFORE they get addicted to anything i.e. trying to minimise use that stems from other problems (mental health or otherwise). I feel like that might work a lot better than trying to catch people once they are using.
Confirmed from June 1st all pharmacies will be asking and recording so those in my situation I would begin to make plans