Mr. Krinkle
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Messages
- 29,424
you two oughta stop gaying up the thread already
Was the Vaccine Designed to kill
- Thread starter OpiateKiller
- Start date
Electrum1
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 29,145
I mean, we already know they're contaminated with DNA fragments due to the manufacturing process that is different than the manufacturing process used for the trials, so we were smart to not get the shots and some people will just be mad about that forever because they're "smarter", so fuck em
DNA Contamination of COVID Vaccines Explored in Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
TUCSON, Ariz., Dec. 11, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The current controversy over the alleged DNA contamination of COVID-19 vaccines involves complex issues, and also shows the difficulties in arriving at truth in today’s polarized and politicized atmosphere, writes Jane Orient, M.D., in the winter...
Then other evidence like birth rates dropping ~9 months after billions of shots were given, but not dropping from 2020 to 2021 during covid, adds even more suspicion, but people that took the shots can worry about that stuff since we don't need to
Wonder what happened in the second quarter of 2021 that would cause lower birth rates ~9 months later?
Switzerland:
The three lines in 2021 are % of age group vaccinated
Netherlands:
Germany:
UK:
North Dakota:
Norway:
Taiwan:
Dept. of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. Republic of China(Taiwan) - Latest News
Dept. of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. Republic of China(Taiwan) - Latest Newswww.ris.gov.tw
Slovenia:
Just to clarify in case I am misinterpreting, but are you actually asserting that I have schizophrenia?
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
I mean, we already know they're contaminated with DNA fragments due to the manufacturing process that is different than the manufacturing process used for the trials, so we were smart to not get the shots and some people will just be mad about that forever because they're "smarter", so fuck em
DNA Contamination of COVID Vaccines Explored in Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
TUCSON, Ariz., Dec. 11, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The current controversy over the alleged DNA contamination of COVID-19 vaccines involves complex issues, and also shows the difficulties in arriving at truth in today’s polarized and politicized atmosphere, writes Jane Orient, M.D., in the winter...finance.yahoo.com
Then other evidence like birth rates dropping ~9 months after billions of shots were given, but not dropping from 2020 to 2021 during covid, adds even more suspicion, but people that took the shots can worry about that stuff since we don't need to
Mate there are 11 DIFFERENT vaccines - so don't overstate the facts.
FLICC again...
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
That's for you to decide. Choose wisely - we pity you, we don't dislike you.
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
Yeah - I'm 100% a mainframe based in Basel.
But see ho people drip in the poison... like forgetting that their are 11 vaccines in use worldwide (at last count) so saying 'we all know' is utter FLICC.
Some people lack the critical skills to just point that out. Because then it means their sweeping statement is just utter rubbish.
Jabberwocky
Frumious Bandersnatch
you want a real conspiracy?
tell me why paranoia.com has been forwarding to disney.com for the last 26 years
tell me why paranoia.com has been forwarding to disney.com for the last 26 years
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
COVID for sure - they planned ahead.
I'm asking you a simple direct question, so I can temper my response accordingly.
Are you actually making a direct assertion about my mental state or not?
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
I hear that COVID was air-dropped by aliens using 5G into the Bermuda Triangle using Elvis as pilot. But don't tell anyone - the deep state is hushing it all up but one only has to look at the statistics on people ordering pepperoni on their Domino's pizza to see RIGHT through that lie.
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
But seriously - get help.
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
REALLY.
I am not seeking conflict - but you are clearly demonstrating mental illness.
Last edited:
Electrum1
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 29,145
Bro he has aspergers or something, it's not worth it
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
Mate - if the guy is ill, I think it's only fair to say so.
As I understand it people with Asperger's aren't delusional, so it doesn't enter the equation.
I thought this was 'The Dive', a place when we can all be honest.
If you feel the guy needs protecting - then maybe you also see he's delusional. If so, then at least be honest about it. I don't seek conflict but if someone is ill, shouldn't I raise my concerns? It's not like I'm alone in being concerned.
At least he isn't a sociopath who takes pleasure in harming the mental health of others. He's a victim of that and that this culture exists within BL is damaging. But this is 'The Dive' so nobody is ever going to stop such actions. People knowingly posting 'mal information' with a view to just seeing who they can delude does not speak well of that person.
Last edited:
You've crossed the line into personal attack at this point. Not that I give a shit about your diagnosis or that it holds any validity what so ever, but you've got some nerve to actually accuse someone of being mentally ill without knowing anything about them, as if making that accusation would be in any way helpful (if it were actually true). So, yes, you are looking for conflict.
Yeah, that figures.
What even is this. You don't even know me. Or anything about who I am. To be blunt, you're making an accusation based on nothing but the fact that you disagree with my intellectual position. If you did that in real life, especially if it were towards someone who had been directly negatively affected by these vaccines, you very well might get biffed on the nose for it.
Dude stop, please stop
I'm not a victim. Neither is John Campbell (in one of the video links), or the many people who have changed their position on what covid is. I came to the position I'm at now on my own, having actually recognized the incongruence between reality and what the government was saying at the time, and after then going to the ONS statistics myself and seeing for myself what it shows (I have posted it here before). Absolutely nothing about my position is unreasonable, or in the realm of mental illness, despite what you think. I hope for the sake of my loved ones there is nothing in those fucking jabs, because everyone I love has taken them.
You say you're concerned. But yet you show no concern for the fact that undertakers are removing clots from people that have no precedent in medical literature? Assuming you've taken the jabs, you're more the victim than I am. I'd be pretty fucking anxious if I were in your position right now.
Electrum1
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 29,145
It's funny that there was always the hypochondriac female demographic, but covid empowered them to not be embarrassed so now it's part of their public personality
I don't think it is, but it kinda looks like a syringe tattoo on her arm. Maybe it is though
I don't think it is, but it kinda looks like a syringe tattoo on her arm. Maybe it is though
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
When Science Becomes Embroiled in Conflict: Recognizing the Public’s Need for Debate while Combating Conspiracies and Misinformation
Most democracies seek input from scientists to inform policies. This can put scientists in a position of intense scrutiny. Here we focus on situations in which scientific evidence conflicts with people’s worldviews, preferences, or vested interests. ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
When I point out that someone is employing FLICC, simply responding by posting MORE FLICC is merely underline the point that they are either incapable or unwilling to use reasoned argument based on high quality evidence.
I post citations to peer-reviewed journal articles while others employ anecdotal evidence from mass media outlets and social media platforms as if it's of equal quality. I even posted the hierarchy of evidence but here it is again:
But let's be clear on one point. There are at least 22 different COVID vaccines in use around the world and so even the title of this thread is misleading.
Pfizer–BioNTech (original)
Pfizer–BioNTech (omicron)
Moderna (original)
Moderna (omicron)
Oxford–AstraZeneca
Janssen
Sputnik V
Sputnik Light
Convidecia
iNCOVACC
Sinopharm BIBP
CoronaVac
Covaxin
Valneva
Sinopharm WIBP
Novavax
Sanofi–GSK
Abdala
EpiVacCorona
Zifivax
Soberana 02
There are actually more with certain nations choosing to develop their own (such as Iran). This isn't a secret. So why would someone choose to obfuscate that fact? If I might suggest, it's so that people can make huge generalizations in bad faith.
As I have already stated, it's not inherently bad to first find data within the mainstream media but the mainstream media is a for-profit enterprise. They seek to engage the maximum number of people with a view to monetizing their content. So look at the sources they cite. Be extremely wary if they provide few or no citations. Check all citations and most importantly, check if their is a conflict of interests.
I would suggest that someone who is self-publishing and selling books on the topic of science denial masquerading as skepticism has an extremely serious conflict of interests. For that person not to declare that conflict of interest should be a red flag. While it does not inherently discredit their work, it is recognized that all people, all researchers, all scientists carry subconscious biases which is why journals REQUIRE that disclosure. Conformation bias is a real issue. It might not be conscious which is why peer review matters.
All of the above has been stated again and again and yet FLICC appears again and again. When someone points out that another user is posting is FLICC, if that user's response is to post even more FLICC, that's delusional. That is why I simply posted citations to raise my concerns.
Last edited:
Fire&Water
Pumpkin King
It's funny that there was always the hypochondriac female demographic, but covid empowered them to not be embarrassed so now it's part of their public personality
I don't think it is, but it kinda looks like a syringe tattoo on her arm. Maybe it is though
I think its a schlong wearing a mask
Electrum1
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 29,145
The flu data isn't fake news, even though you want to shoot a messenger (Scientific American) for reporting the same data widely reported elsewhere. It seems like you're having some kind of meltdown or mental complex. It's very easy to confirm that many credible sources shared the same flu data that appears to have set you off.
Just admit already that the flu data @-=SS=- posted is officially recorded as true by the CDC, WHO, and other major institutions
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
I simply stated that it's important to obtain the citations and ensure one has read and understood those citations. I even stated that there is nothing inherently wrong with first finding out about something via mass media, but that it requires those extra steps.
This does not detract from the fact that someone is displaying symptoms of psychosis. It's not something I take pleasure in pointing out, but as I have previously noted, The Dive isn't moderated.
If you want to REALLY discuss honest concerns about a scientific topic, we have a forum for that.
Neuroscience and Pharmacology Discussion.
A vaccine is within the remit of pharmacology. It's also a well moderated forum and the mods are extremely well informed and will engage on any topic. I believe their is at least one mod with a post graduate qualification in virology and so they are quite well informed about this specific topic. Raise any concerns with them - they work hard to ensure people have the best data available.
Last edited: