i'm a golfer and i have no idea what that means.
alasdair
alasdair
Um, okay...![]()
Apparently it means that golfers know what they are thinking and what they are doing. I'm not a golfer so I don't even know who they are.i'm a golfer and i have no idea what that means.
alasdair
if we do the deaths (35,000) out of how many people were vaxxed (at least 4 billion but i rounded way down), it comes to .000875%... and that's assuming that the reports FOR SURE put the vaccine as the cause of death. those are MUCH better odds than playing viral roulette.But we know that the real world harms from the Pfizer mRNA shot
all things that are related to the virus, and i'm pretty sure (layman's guess) it's more likely that the virus would contribute than the vaccine. why would the vaccine be more likely to cause these? especially considering the numbers from the openvaers link. also, a cursory search tells me the virus is indeed more likely to cause at least gbs and bell's palsy, i didn't look the rest up. oh, and shingles.go well beyond myocarditis and include anaphylaxis, Bell’s Palsy, heart attack, thrombocytopenia/ low platelet, permanent disability, shingles, and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) to name a few.
why "may" they show up later? you might as well say they "may" show up later, "maybe" in much higher amounts from the virus.Cancer, diabetes, endocrine disruption, and autoimmune disorders may show up later.
according to the study, their results indicate that it's still prudent to get vaccinated, but with young males we need to be careful about which vaccine to administer.the risk of myocarditis was higher after vaccination than SARS-CoV-2 infection
o jeepers, please tell me you're not a homeopathy type... if so, i've got some magical water to sell youallopathic medicine
if people who are the most affected by the COVID-19 disease (the elderly, diabetics, hypertensive, and immunocompromised people like those with HIV) are also more susceptible to suffering the negative effects of repeated mRNA vaccination, is it then justified to booster them?
The vaccines were the real pandemic. It's just sketchy as fk when u see the government trying to give all kinds of incentives for ppl to get vaccinated or get boosters. Something just doesn't seem well. There's already an increase mortality rate worldwide since most of the population took the vaccines. Pfff, go do some fking research. Not what CNN/FOX NEWS tells you. It doesn't make my blood boil, it makes me laugh ppl like you. Use your fucking common sense, everything is related.^^^
@Illyria99
maybe because i can't leave alone the injustice of ppl spreading harmful bullshit. it makes my blood boil, and if i don't call it out... then this thread becomes nothing more than a disinfo/ misinfo circle jerk.obviously i'm not going to change any of y'all's opinions, but maybe i can prevent others from falling into the same stubborn trap.
i also want to make sure i'm not missing anything, because i certainly wouldn't want to take the vaccines or get my kids vaccinated, if it REALLY DID turn out that they were anywhere near as dangerous as the viruses. so, here i am. still waiting on any good evidence that the vaccines are worse than the virus. which, for some reason, people keep mistakenly saying.
that's some obvious bullshit.vaccines were the real pandemic
oh the irony... no YOU do a tiny bit of research and find said evidence... shouldn't be too hard, considering how many people (you fantasize) are apparently dying from the vaccine.Pfff, go do some fking research
you mean to tell me you think that all 5 or so billion ppl that got jabbed are mindlessly following the evil one world government/ illuminati or whatever you apparently believe... and said cabal of control freaks only wanted the rebels, the freethinkers, the conspiracy theorists that refused the jab... they only want those ppl left? kill off all the obedient and keep the rebels? i've seen others point this out, and i just don't get it... why????THEY CAN TOTALLY CONTROL THE FEW THAT ARE LEFT.
Dude that guy up there js some stubborn mofo haha. The agent Smith effect is a real thing, haha. He doesn't see the how the panorama is developing from a broad perspective. So many drs have come out to speak but they have been either silenced/killed, that's y the rest don't come out to speak the truth about the vaccine. The drs that do support the vaccine are just sheeps that mumble anything the WHO tells them to repeat. It's unfuckingbelievable, I really do hope this guys kids don't develop complications from the vaccine since he put poison on em at such young age. We are all one anyway and even tho he clearly is blind and doesn't see how harmful this shit is, I wish him the best for his familyImagine being at a place where you have people valiantly defending experimental pharmaceutical products for a virus that kills .001% of the population. The power of propaganda is unreal
you sound like a kook... and again, since you antivaxxers seem to be one hive mind with amnesia, i must remind: i don't watch tv... and have been paying quite a bit of attention to what y'all have been posting... you still haven't given a shred of good evidence that the vaccines are killing even A LEVEL OF MAGNITUDE LESS than the virus, let alone more than the virus. hmu when your "common sense" allows you to seek out said evidence, and then hmu.
until then:
that's some obvious bullshit.
oh the irony... no YOU do a tiny bit of research and find said evidence... shouldn't be too hard, considering how many people (you fantasize) are apparently dying from the vaccine.
what an amazing, unprecedented conspiracy, no loose lips and EXTREME cooperation between doctors and hospitals, governments that are not all allies and some that are enemies, etc etc... my head spins just thinking about how amazing this conspiracy is.
this part is funny:
you mean to tell me you think that all 5 or so billion ppl that got jabbed are mindlessly following the evil one world government/ illuminati or whatever you apparently believe... and said cabal of control freaks only wanted the rebels, the freethinkers, the conspiracy theorists that refused the jab... they only want those ppl left? kill off all the obedient and keep the rebels? i've seen others point this out, and i just don't get it... why????
5% of 5 billion is 250,000,000... what a ridiculously insane numberRe: Was the Vaccine Designed to Kill?
If everything the conspiracy devotees say is true, the vaccine kills 5% of those who receive it. If it was designed to kill, a survival rate of 95% is poor design. Maybe the newer ones will have a better fatality rate
I'm sorry about your uncle, but can you be certain it was vaccine-related?My uncle dropped dead suddenly from an aneurysm one morning just a month after being jabbed, so I've seen first hand how bad those injections are.
The thing is that you're imagining dots.They want the people to be divided.
They want them weak
They want less people
so THEY CAN TOTALLY CONTROL THE FEW THAT ARE LEFT. CONNECT THE FKING DOTS AND IT STARTS MAKING MORE SENSE
You are the biggest causer of climate change, it’s as simple as that. All of the early elitist literature speculated that the ideal world would have no more than a few million people. I don’t think it’s realistic, and am not sure if this is their actual goal, but I see why people think this way.The thing is that you're imagining dots.
Why would "they" want to reduce the world's population? The agenda that I think is the most compelling is the fact that elites genuinely want to accrue as much wealth and power as possible. One really bad way to achieve that is to reduce the numbers of paying customers.
It just assumes an idealism that I think is at odds with the grasping nature of the elites. I mean like you I can see why people might imagine this, but the reality is probably more about greed than it is protecting the earth.You are the biggest causer of climate change, it’s as simple as that. All of the early elitist literature speculated that the ideal world would have no more than a few million people. I don’t think it’s realistic, and am not sure if this is their actual goal, but I see why people think this way.
Because too many people means that at any given time they could uprise and fight for their rights. The less ppl they have under control is better for them, they wouldn't stand a chance in that case. Just bloody look atThe thing is that you're imagining dots.
Why would "they" want to reduce the world's population? The agenda that I think is the most compelling is the fact that elites genuinely want to accrue as much wealth and power as possible. One really bad way to achieve that is to reduce the numbers of paying customers.