delta_9
Bluelighter
No, he's not. All things in moderation. The amount of sunlight that it takes to produce a sufficient amount of vitamin D is not very dangerous at all.
"Sufficient" and "optimum" are two very different things. Yes, you are correct that 10-15 minutes a day in the sun is enough to prevent rickets, however the amount of vitamin D necessary to reach "optimum" levels is much higher than the RDA and supplementation is always a good idea.(As I said earlier, when it comes to supplementation with vitamins, D is the only one which is pretty much unanimously agreed upon). To sit in the sun long enough to get those "optimum" levels would be a bad idea.
Granted, I don't know how much vitamin D the skin is able to produce per x amount of minutes(of course the amount of exposed skin is a big factor), so it is of course different per person, but I would say at least 2000 IU per day is recommended. 75µg K2 would also help greatly. With proper vitamin D3/K2 intake, calcium deficiency is pretty much non existent.
EDIT - I noticed a few people saying they took 50,000 IU per day? This is not good. Toxicity starts to show at around 10,000 IU and larger doses have resulted in serious disturbances in calcium and phosphorus metabolism. Remember, vitamin D is a fat soluble nutrient, so no more than 5,000 IU a day just to be safe.
Last edited: