34-dihydroxyphen
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
- Messages
- 2,362
They don't need to keep you under for a long period of time to administer the other drugs in the cocktail, though. It would take maybe 1, 3, or 5 minutes tops.
I believe midazolam would last at least 5 minutes even in the event of a super-metabolizer, etc. unless someone had a bizarre tolerance to the drug from lifelong abuse.
Sekio, or any other pharmacology know-it-alls want to jump in here?
It may be more a matter if just how knocked out one happens to be. The midazolam might be enough to knock someone out for a few minutes or so before they snap back into it, which is probably more likely to occur on the day you have been sentenced to die and are loaded with adrenaline. Also, the paralytic agent is said to be extremely uncomfortable in several regards; who knows whether this wakes one up or not if they are only barely unconscious.
Ultimately, it's the potassium that will likely result in the prisoners death. It'll stop the heart which will result in death very quickly. So, all we need is for them to be unconscious for maybe 10 minutes tops.
But again this depends on if you're worried about what the witnesses see. If that's a concern things get much more complicated.
I think this discussion might benefit if it were clearer what's actually being discussed though. Are we talking about the hypothetical ideal lethal injection? If the current methods are potentially unpleasant? If ALL methods are potentially unpleasant. Does witness experience matter or should it matter? I'm finding it hard to follow where a lot of posts here are actually coming from.
I'm mostly pointing out how terrible the particular method of lethal injection currently used in the US is. It makes no sense to use this combo, unless you maybe want some people to suffer.