• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The SEX ALLEGATIONS Megathread

cduggles said:
No more posts like these in this thread.
Click to expand...
Excuse me, what?
"like these" = means what exactly?

I have no idea what you are trying to say.

Should I make a separate thread for the serious topic of global human trafficking and the increasing amount of children saved, or is that not a subject worthy of discussion?
 
Yes. Look at the title of this thread. Did Weinstein... I won't even ask.

I know a CE&P mod moved it here, which is why these posts are still up in this thread.

I agree it's a serious issue. I'm just v familiar with the non-YouTube version and how to focus on an important issue without braying about the MSM not focusing on it. It's not new and it's not groundbreaking just because Q or whoever told you it is.

What about MS-13? No cute meme?
 
Remember...when in doubt, build a WALL

cduggles said:
Yes. Look at the title of this thread. Did Weinstein... I won't even ask.

I know a CE&P mod moved it here, which is why these posts are still up in this thread.

I agree it's a serious issue. I'm just v familiar with the non-YouTube version and how to focus on an important issue without braying about the MSM not focusing on it. It's not new and it's not groundbreaking just because Q or whoever told you it is.

What about MS-13? No cute meme?
Click to expand...
ap-photo-evan-vucci-we-need-much-better-border-mechanisms-and-30763939.png
 
the martyr act is curious. if i had a nickel for every time somebody said "i'll probably get banned for this" or "this post will just get deleted" and it never happened, i'd have a stack of cash. you guys love to play the victim and the irony of it appears to be completely lost on you...

alasdair
 
alasdairm said:
the martyr act is curious. if i had a nickel for every time somebody said "i'll probably get banned for this" or "this post will just get deleted" and it never happened, i'd have a stack of cash. you guys love to play the victim and the irony of it appears to be completely lost on you...

alasdair
Click to expand...

Every single mention of Hillary Clinton in a negative light is <snipped>.
If I had a nickel for every time that happened I could run a campaign against Trump and then lose.
 
JGrimez said:
Every single mention of Hillary Clinton in a negative light is <snipped>.
Click to expand...
not true. it it were how are these still visible:

http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads...n-Accusers?p=14349256&viewfull=1#post14349256
http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads...n-Accusers?p=14342333&viewfull=1#post14342333
http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads...estigation?p=14341136&viewfull=1#post14341136
etc.

spacejunk made it pretty clear:

spacejunk said:
2. Posting off-topic. You can discuss your obsession with Clinton or whatever, but in the appropriate thread
You've been asked repeatedly to stay on-topic.
Click to expand...

it's straightforward.

alasdair
 
alasdairm said:
the martyr act is curious. if i had a nickel for every time somebody said "i'll probably get banned for this" or "this post will just get deleted" and it never happened, i'd have a stack of cash. you guys love to play the victim and the irony of it appears to be completely lost on you...

alasdair
Click to expand...

< *SNIP* removed off topic nonsense- swilow>

Am I allowed to state that the vast majority of people that have been taken down for sexual assault/harassment allegations have been liberals/democrats/aligned with the Left? (true, on-topic statement)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems you want to link left wing political views with abhorrent things like paedophilia, implying the views you disagree with comprise the evillest of evil. Do you really think you linking between left wing views and paedophilia contributes to conversation and not to ensuing countless arguments in which your copy pasta schtick is given more air? How do you plan to substantiate it, besides resorting to typical biased publications?

I suppose i could just dismiss your views though because conservative and alt right views have been linked to low IQ and you may be incapable of seeing how selective and biased your beliefs are. :| Two can play. But I wouldn't because such is counterproductive.

So no, don't bother posting your biased and offensive propaganda here.
 
Max Flight said:
I am realizing that apparently many drug users are too busy chasing dope, too notice what's really going on. Hmm . I Wonder if that's a coincidence?
Click to expand...

Btw, I noticed your comment. (Get it?)

Perhaps when trying to get people to believe bs conspiracy theories or whatever you're pushing, you might not want to appeal to an audience that largely consists of drug users by stating "that apparently many drug users are too busy chasing dope, too (sic) notice what's really going on."

Emphasis mine, incorrect grammar not mine.
 
Perfect example of hiding in plain sight:

Head of prominent charity that campaigns against child abuse is arrested for 'trying to arrange to rape multiple children as young as two'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-abuse-advocate-arrested-trying-sex-kids.html

The head of a charity that campaigns against sexual violence has been arrested in New York for child pornography and allegedly trying to meet with children as young as two for sex.

Joel Davis, 22, is accused of trying to set up sexual encounters between himself and young children, as well as soliciting an undercover FBI agent to send sexually explicit videos of minors.

The New Yorker was arrested on Tuesday on child sex abuse and child pornography charges.

Davis is the chairman of the International Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict - an organization devoted to ending sexual violence.

4DB0E23900000578-5890179-image-m-17_1530112828051.jpg


He's with her: Davis posted this picture after Hillary Clinton's election defeat, suggesting he had campaigned for the 2016 loser
 
A picture is worth a thousands words (no pun intended)

Ivy League student known for fighting sexual violence is charged with child sex crimes
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...with-child-sex-crimes/?utm_term=.b80b292217b2

For a 22-year-old Columbia University student, Joel Davis had built an impressive reputation as an activist for ending sexual violence.

He was the founding executive director of the international organization Youth to End Sexual Violence. He served as a youth ambassador for the United Nations special representative on sexual violence in conflict. He was on the steering committee of the International Campaign to Stop Rape & Gender Violence in Conflict, a group of more than 5,000 human rights organizations and experts worldwide.

Davis traveled around the world, worked alongside high-profile activists such as Angelina Jolie, delivered a TED talk and appeared on media panels. In 2015, at age 19, he claimed to have been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.

His work focused particularly on ending sexual violence against the most vulnerable victims: children.

Yet behind this virtuous front, Davis was allegedly committing the same types of crimes he claimed to be fighting, federal prosecutors say. On Tuesday, authorities arrested Davis on charges of attempting to sexually exploit a child, enticing a child to engage in sexual activity and possessing child pornography. If convicted, he could face a long sentence.
 
Captain.Heroin said:
WP is a bit more acceptable, though doesn't Trump hate the WP? How can you stand to read it?
Click to expand...
I can't lol. I only link it when certain people need a "reputable" source.

If both sides of the news spectrum are reporting on it then it probably happened.
It's shocking that some people who we trust to look after children may be the worst abusers.
Can't blame them though, it would be the best place to hide.
But how did a 22yr old become the chairman/CEO of these organizations?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top