Vurtual
Bluelighter
@Sam - The main points are correct though, and not argued by the msm (ie that her brother Havers was the one who 'lost' the dickens dossier, and also covered up for known tory paedophile Peter Hayman, and supported PIE). As for this being the information age, all this stuff was known about when it was happening, and various attempts to spill it were made (eg scallywag magazine).
In some ways the investigative reporting of those days was much superior (they found this stuff without having to use twatter's mob-sourcing or david icke's forum).
And who knew that Butler-Sloss was Nigel Havers' Aunty (his dad was the dodgy attourney general in question).
...
Anyway: Leon Brittain, Leon Brittain, Leon Brittain... Is that enough for the lawyers? Chances are that they will allow a certain story about him to get out which can be 'proved' to be wrong (or maybe he's already 'cover' for someone even more famous) - and then sue the fuck out of some people, ignoring the stories/evidence that are out there already (as they did with lord mcalpine) (allegedly...
)
In some ways the investigative reporting of those days was much superior (they found this stuff without having to use twatter's mob-sourcing or david icke's forum).
And who knew that Butler-Sloss was Nigel Havers' Aunty (his dad was the dodgy attourney general in question).
...
Anyway: Leon Brittain, Leon Brittain, Leon Brittain... Is that enough for the lawyers? Chances are that they will allow a certain story about him to get out which can be 'proved' to be wrong (or maybe he's already 'cover' for someone even more famous) - and then sue the fuck out of some people, ignoring the stories/evidence that are out there already (as they did with lord mcalpine) (allegedly...

Last edited: