• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The Last Covid-19 Megathread v. Hopefully...

my guess is it's probably accurate but still pretty misleading.

red states aka less vaxxed states aka rural states = much less testing = much less reported cases
Yeah, I'm in a red state and don't know a single person that has reported their positive cases except one person who caught it very early on and works in state govt, so he had to report it
 
media%2FFTyHUyvXsAEWG6k.png



Fake news obviously
 
Last edited:
The great harm this experimental therapy is causing won’t be know widespread till insurance companies sue and get discovery. And only if it gets in front of the non subverted judge will it get to discovery, and those are dropping like flies unfortunatly
Yeah, there's a reason why funeral service stocks like SCI have been outperforming the market this year
 
"For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines."

 
Please keep all blatant conspiracy chat, such as "subverted judges" and "fabricated pandemics" to the Dive.
 

wow, amazing journal there. impact factor 0.86, which means that articles in it barely ever get cited. citation is a reasonable measure of whether or not an article has helped further a field of reaseach. for the medical field i think below 5 is not worth reading.

anyone who mentions Peter McCullough is a very trustworthy source..... not

incidentally, that is a massive indictment of the US healthcare system. i would fucking hate not knowing if i was being given extremely invasive treatment to make hospitals money, or because i actually needed it. as the US clinical outcomes weren't signficantly different to those in coutries where hospitals don't have a profit motive, the argument falls flat immediately. but the fact that its even possible is chilling.
 
Was the actual video against the rules?

Your post was against forum guidelines. It is your responsibility to educate yourself on that.

Please do not derail this thread with this kind of discussion. What is and isn't against the rules is clearly laid out for you.
 
They are adopting authoritarian medicine in Ontario, Canada by requiring physicians to either follow authoritarian guidelines which are not science based, or have their license to practice medicine revoked.


Just like they did in the Soviet Union - you follow the official science, even when it's wrong, or else you suffer the wrath of the faceless bureaucracy.

We're just a hop skip and jump now from eugenics and headlines like, "You're going to be turned into Soylent - here's why that's a good thing"
 


Look at that ^

"A new study from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that those with food allergies are 50 percent less likely to become infected with SARS-CoV-2. Along with the new finding, the research also found that obesity and a high body mass index (BMI) are factors for an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and that asthma or eczema did not increase the risk for infection, an NIH statement explains. Details on the study were published last month in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. "



50% less likely! that's huge



"Researchers speculate that type two inflammation—a normal immune response that can occur in response to infections or parasites but also occurs in allergic conditions like eczema and some asthmas—may reduce levels of the ACE2 receptor on the surface of airway cells. ACE2 is the receptor that the SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein binds to, allowing the virus to enter cells. Having fewer ACE2 receptors limits the virus's ability to infect, per a statement. More research is needed to identify what other mechanisms may play a role in reducing the risk of viral infection, per Science Alert."
 
Here's four steps to fail even quicker next time by manufacturing vaccines in even less time with even less long term data. Why wait 10+ years for safety data?

 
Seems pretty obvious now that Pfizer lied about 2% reinfection rate for Paxlovid.

Tons of important people have been posting about getting sick again after taking Paxlovid

FURjbomXwBATrpo
 
This has become like a mental illness for people. There are less hospitalized now than from a flu and people are still talking about "must be diligent" like they're fucking war heroes cloistered in their home wrapped in a blanket with kleenex stuffed up their nostrils
 
Top