• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The Last Covid-19 Megathread v. Hopefully...

Electrum1 said:
Wouldn't the control group be the non-vaccinated? What other kind of control group are you thinking?
Click to expand...
a supporting set of data without any variables such as people choosing to get tested on their own volition for whatever reason

unvaccinated people might choose to get tested more for a minor head cold, wondering if it's covid

vaccinated people might choose not to get tested for a minor head cold since they probably believe covid is much less of a risk?

just as an example-^

how does this data suggest anything about the immune system if it's the case that even people with zero symptoms can still test positive?
 
Opi_Kid_Rock said:
Why is my local News saying it’s in our tap water? I stopped drinking tap water as of yesterday.
Click to expand...
Lol, I saw something about that, I thought they were just testing waste water, but idk now. Saw a post where a PCR test showed positive using tap water, but I'll assume that's just because PCR tests are faulty with Covid.

If it really is in the tap water then why even worry any longer, there's no avoiding it at that point, unless you stop showering and/or boil all your water.
 
so if more people that are unvaxxed are showing up, then they should have more positive tests

but they don't
 
Negentropic said:
a supporting set of data without any variables such as people choosing to get tested on their own volition for whatever reason
Click to expand...
I don't see how there would be a control group without people choosing to get tested, or even forcefully tested I guess

Negentropic said:
unvaccinated people might choose to get tested more for a minor head cold, wondering if it's covid

vaccinated people might choose not to get tested for a minor head cold since they probably believe covid is much less of a risk?

just as an example-^

how does this data suggest anything about the immune system if it's the case that even people with zero symptoms can still test positive?
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter if they have zero symptoms. Just matters what the results are, and non-vaxxed people who tested at Walgreens had the lowest rate of positives compared to all classes of vaxxed people, which lends (A lot) of credibility to vaxxed immune systems being less effective against Covid
 
very bold move of Walgreens to publicly release information showing proof that they've been harming people...

doesn't seem like a good business decision, might effect their stock price if word were to get out...
 
Electrum1 said:
Lol, I said RATE of positive tests, not total number. Non-vaxxed had more tests compared to each of the different levels of vaccinated, 29.5% of tests were non-vaxxed people, and they had a lower RATE of positives as seen in the charts I already posted:
FQGKdyeakAQ0KXa

FQGKdzIaAAIM26-


It's data for literally the entire U.S.
Click to expand...
These charts crack me up man. I've posted a couple similar ones from other countries too in the previous thread.

I do find it hard to believe vaccines will essentially make people that much more susceptible to COVID, there are probably a couple other factors in play + some variance, but maybe, I'm open to the idea but I don't think we'll ever know.
 
Negentropic said:
covid vaccine 2.0 is coming

I'm preordering one, collectors edition
Click to expand...
Make a deal with them. "Instead of just some of the bottle, if you inject me with the WHOLE bottle that means I can keep the empty bottle, right? I collect historical stuff."
 
covid is a hoax lol our government now admitted the total deaths is only 51 not over 500.

Director of health resigned. SCAMEDEMIC!@!!!!!@@@@!

Guess what not a single unvaxed person i know caught omricon. yet every mf with a booster shot caught it
 
Opi_Kid_Rock said:
They said Covid is in my local tap Water all throughout Canada. Makes no sense. How would it get there?
Click to expand...
Well things like benzos and meth get into tap water and even the water table, rivers and lakes. It's really bad for fish. There are fish out there actually addicted to meth, benzos are even worse and deforms them.

People urinate the drugs out and it ends up in the fish somehow. It's well documented.

I'd assume covid works the same way, however, I'm skeptical how it would survive in water.
 
Xorkoth said:
That seems sketchy. Covid can't survive long without a human host. I doubt this could be true. Is the government saying it? Or who is?
Click to expand...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Survival of Coronaviruses in Water and Wastewater

The advent of severe acute respiratory syndrome and its potential environmental transmission indicates the need for more information on the survival of coronavirus in water and wastewater. The survival of representative coronaviruses, feline infectious ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

human coronavirus 229E was determined in filtered and unfiltered tap water (4 and 23°C) and wastewater (23°C). This was compared to poliovirus 1 under the same test conditions. Inactivation of coronaviruses in the test water was highly dependent on temperature, level of organic matter, and presence of antagonistic bacteria. The time required for the virus titer to decrease 99.9% (T99.9) shows that in tap water, coronaviruses are inactivated faster in water at 23°C (10 days) than in water at 4°C (>100 days). Coronaviruses die off rapidly in wastewater, with T99.9 values of between 2 and 4 days. Poliovirus survived longer than coronaviruses in all test waters, except the 4°C tap water.

snip.png



human coronavirus CAN live in tap water for extended periods of time, especially in cold water

wow

Surprised Meme GIF


also... before anyone claims this is fake or government lies this is from 2009....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top