• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The ISIS Megathread

herpa derp

okay, evil is the other guy, right?

No, evil is evil.

By your metric, a 50 year old man fucking a baby is not evil. Genocide isn't evil. Nothing is evil. All morality is relative.

I suppose it's a nice philosophy when it suits you but from your previous posts you seem to think of those that oppose widescale immigrant are evil.
 
totally incorrect, as usual.

by saying that there is no such thing as evil, i am NOT appealing to moral relativism. i am humanising, rather than your typical demonising soap opera fantasy world view.

grow the fuck up, little boy.
 
totally incorrect, as usual.

by saying that there is no such thing as evil, i am NOT appealing to moral relativism. i am humanising, rather than your typical demonising soap opera fantasy world view.

grow the fuck up, little boy.

I hear plenty of demonizing when it comes to discussing the Holocaust, or Officer Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman.

The humanising comes into play whenever it's minorities perpetuating evil though right?
 
I hear plenty of demonizing when it comes to discussing the Holocaust, or Officer Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman.

show me examples, or i'll be forced to conclude that you're simply a liar.

Hitler wasn't evil, he was just applying power. He was actually a sensitive man and human after all. HURRR

Yep, we can't look at Hitler through our demonizing soap opera version of the world, we need to see he was a human just like you or me.

adolf hitler was, in fact, a human being. is that not true?
 
show me examples, or i'll be forced to conclude that you're simply a liar.

"
being born white and in a socially enabling circumstance is an amazing accomplishment. you deserve a fucking nobel prize for it. you get ten extra xbox points, you idiot"

"
the prejudiced loser has no critical thought capacity, and no comprehension that forces beyond the control of the individuals in question are coercing them to be that statistic. the fallacy of equal footing is his unquestionable law of nature, his personal own buy-bull. "

Sounds like your demonizing ME.

Although I suppose we could arguer I'm far worse than Hitler.
 
sounds like you're back peddling, because those quotes neither demonise nor are they with relation to ...
lostintegros said:
discussing the Holocaust, or Officer Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman.

you, sir, are a liar.
 
sounds like you're back peddling, because those quotes neither demonise nor are they with relation to ...


you, sir, are a liar.

Well they show you do demonize myself, a fellow Bluelighter, for having dissenting opinions, yet I guess you are above demonizing Hitler, radical Islamists, or paedophiles because you're a positive glass-half-full humanist type. Okay then.
 
Well they show you do demonize myself, a fellow Bluelighter, for having dissenting opinions, yet I guess you are above demonizing Hitler, radical Islamists, or paedophiles because you're a positive glass-half-full humanist type. Okay then.

FYE (for your education)

dehumanize(diːˈhjuːməˌnaɪz) or dehumanise
vb (tr)
1. to deprive of human qualities
2. to render mechanical, artificial, or routine

Just admit you were wrong. It would be a sign of strength and integrity if you do.
 
FYE (for your education)

dehumanize(diːˈhjuːməˌnaɪz) or dehumanise
vb (tr)
1. to deprive of human qualities
2. to render mechanical, artificial, or routine

Just admit you were wrong. It would be a sign of strength and integrity if you do.

You said I had "no critical thought capacity and no comprehension", both of those are human qualities.

Check and mate.
 
You said I had "no critical thought capacity and no comprehension", both of those are human qualities.

Check and mate.

a human can function without these. many people do. i have, therefore, in no way suggested that you are not human.

give up, man.
 
a human can function without these. many people do. i have, therefore, in no way suggested that you are not human.

give up, man.

Dehumanization or dehumanisation describes the denial of "humanness" to other people. It is theorized to take on two forms: animalistic dehumanization, which is employed on a largely intergroup basis, and mechanistic dehumanization, which is employed on a largely interpersonal basis.[1] Dehumanization can occur discursively (e.g., idiomatic language that likens certain human beings to non-human animals, verbal abuse, erasing one's voice from discourse), ded]
 
^indeed.

nice big, bold fonts do not substitute for a lack of content here, pal. your beligerent denial and failure to acknowledge when you misapply meanings of words are quite apparent here for anyone to see. losblancos has no integrity, clearly trying to manipulate circumstances to support a childish desire to compete, rather than converse.

this incessant immaturity is the epitome of tedium.

for posterity, sans obnoxious presentation

me said:
a human can function without these. many people do. i have, therefore, in no way suggested that you are not human.

give up, man.

you said:
Dehumanization or dehumanisation describes the denial of "humanness" to other people. It is theorized to take on two forms: animalistic dehumanization, which is employed on a largely intergroup basis, and mechanistic dehumanization, which is employed on a largely interpersonal basis.[1] Dehumanization can occur discursively (e.g., idiomatic language that likens certain human beings to non-human animals, verbal abuse, erasing one's voice from discourse), ded]

see, example of confirmation being posed as contradiction. no further explanation is used, as per your usual M.O. because there is no explanation which would substantiate this as an actual contradiction. i've seen you do this a few times, pretending to look like you're engaging when in fact you are not. and unlike your assertions against my posts, i actually have this example.

you could not produce one shred of evidence to back up this.

you said:
I hear plenty of demonizing when it comes to discussing the Holocaust, or Officer Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman.

So when you hear these things, are they as you allude to, and in this forum? or are they solely taking place in your own head?

now, IF you have a shred of dignity and/or integrity, please produce the evidence or revoke the false claim.
 
Reread the definition, saying I have "no critical thought capacity or comprehension" is definitely along the lines of verbal abuse/erasing ones voice from discourse.

Also,

I hear plenty of demonizing when it comes to discussing the Holocaust, or Officer Darren Wilson or George Zimmerman.

The humanising comes into play whenever it's minorities perpetuating evil though right?

It doesn't say I hear "L2R demonizing when it comes to...". I was referring to people you toe the same line with, largely in lock-step with their moral-relativism (when convenient) and pacifism even in instances of encountering extreme evil that threatens the existence of Western culture. People that demonize Christians in America for something as benign as opposing birth control being covered in employee health coverage, but when it comes to condemning the actions of radical Islam you can hear crickets chirping.
 
Top