• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

The Farce on the War on Drugs [Editorial on LEAP]

erosion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
3,182
The Farce on the War on Drugs
opednews.com
May 11, 2007


My brother Howard Wooldridge served as a decorated police officer and detective in Lansing, Michigan for 18 years. During that time, he collared killers, drunk drivers, child molesters, rapists, wife beaters and drug dealers. What he learned launched him on a crusade to stop the federal government’s useless 35 year “War on Drugs.”

My brother stands so passionate about his cause that he rode his horse Misty 3,300 miles coast to coast across America in 2005. To gain attention, his sweat-stained T-shirt read, “Cops Say Legalize Drugs: Ask Me Why.”

The drug war costs American taxpayers $70 billion a year and over the past 35 years, costs approach a trillion dollars. Result? Drugs remain CHEAPER and MORE available than 35 years ago.

“The war on drugs,” said Howard Wooldridge, one of the founders of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition at www.leap.cc. “How is that working for us in America? Is it reducing crime? Is it reducing rates of death and disease? Is it effective in keeping drugs and drug dealers away from our children? Is it making America safer and more prosperous? As my profession chases drugs, what are we missing? These are important questions as this prohibition approach costs us taxpayers some 70 billion dollars this year.”

Wooldridge said, “As a police officer, I fought on the side of the ‘good guys’ for 18 years in the “War on Drugs,” giving me ample actual experience in the trenches. After much time, consternation and out-and-out frustration in not achieving a single, stated goal in the long term, I came to the conclusion that we must be doing something wrong. It seemed no matter how many dealers we took off the streets, new ones immediately popped up to take their places. The prices for drugs kept falling, indicating an oversupply. The purity became better; heroin increased from 3.6 percent to near 50 percent purity between 1980 and 2007. The prison population kept increasing until over 70 percent of all inmates are there on some drug-related charge. The only thing we have to show for this terrible policy is that today after 36 years and a trillion tax dollars spent, illegal drugs are cheaper, stronger and very easy for our kids to buy.”

In those 18 years, I listened to my brother Howard’s frustrations each time we sat down for dinner. He bemoaned the senselessness of the drug war. The people within the department now work it to keep their jobs and nothing else. The “War on Drugs” exists to exist.

“Why has my profession been unable to make a dent?” Howard Wooldridge asked. “It has not been for lack of trying. Thousands of police officers have been shot and hundreds killed. We have arrested 36 million Americans for drug possession, use or sale. First, understand that drug dealers accept as a condition of employment--death and long prison terms. We know there is an inexhaustible number of people who will risk death to make huge profits that prohibition generates. A second major reason is that when someone buys an illegal drug from a dealer, nobody calls 911 to report the ‘crime.’ It is very difficult for us to catch suspects when the phone does not ring. Neither the buyers nor the sellers see themselves as ‘victims.’

“Drug gangs have spread like the plague out of the large cities and into medium and even small cities. Young teens join gangs to make ‘easy,’ big money selling drugs. Fifteen year olds are shot and killed every week because drug prohibition gives them this job option. Many Hispanic members are the first generation of immigrants who don’t want to work hard like their parents. The role model in the barrio is the rich drug dealer, not the hard-working parent. A policy which many say is to protect kids actually causes hundreds of deaths a year and tens of thousands of destroyed young lives.”

For any curious Americans, MS-13 gangs from El Salvador, now numbering 15,000 members, operate in 33 states according to a recent Newsweek report. They recruit our kids with easy money. Once in the gang, their lives stand at risk.

“On our borders customs officers spend huge amounts of time looking for smuggled drugs which allows them less time for catching the millions who cross illegally,” Howard Wooldridge said. “The Coast Guard is focused on drugs and not the ships which bring over many hundreds of illegals in ships. In the century of 9/11 we should be focusing on threats to the nation and instead we are heavily engaged in a nearly four decade, failed policy of drug prohibition.

“The unintended consequences of this terrible war are needlessly destroying the lives of generations of America's youth. How many people do you know who have used an illegal drug, then put the drugs behind them and gone on to lead productive lives? US presidents, many members of our legislative bodies, tens of thousands of police officers have done exactly that. With imprisonment, those possibilities are eliminated. You can get over an addiction, but you will never get over a conviction.

“Now envision a world where all drugs sell in state-regulated stores, not on street corners by teens which gets them killed. Imagine a world where the federal police focus on securing our borders from armed and unarmed invasion. Envision a world where terrorists don’t buy weapons from money made selling drugs. Imagine a world where felony crime drops over 50 percent and local police focus on drunk drivers, child predators and terrorists. Envision a world where if one day you or a loved one has a drug problem, you see a doctor not a judge. America can have this world, if it repeals its laws of the New Prohibition.”

Officer Howard J. Wooldridge (retired), Education Specialist, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (www.leap.cc), Washington DC

Link
 
preachin to the choir. one of these people needs to write a book and then promote it on Daily Show or Colbert Report.
 
the problem is that (as he put it) "it exists to exist". $70billion per year- there is a shitload of money going into this "war". So there are people out there making a lot of money. There are also a lot of people not making a lot of money, but rather just bringing home a paycheck. There are a lot of people that DEPEND on the drug war to feed their family.

It is big business. The original goal of "stopping drugs" has been replaced by the "business of pretending to stop drugs". A $70 billion dollar a year industry is not going to just cease to exist unfortunately.
 
Blacksoulman said:
preachin to the choir. one of these people needs to write a book and then promote it on Daily Show or Colbert Report.

How would this not be preaching to the choir? LEAP actually goes out and does talks at VFW halls and the like to bunches of senior citizens. Definitely not preaching to the choir. For that matter, seniors are the most likely to vote, and are likely to listen to respected authority figures.
 
panic_the_digital said:
How would this not be preaching to the choir? LEAP actually goes out and does talks at VFW halls and the like to bunches of senior citizens. Definitely not preaching to the choir. For that matter, seniors are the most likely to vote, and are likely to listen to respected authority figures.

i only know about these drug war articles because of this forum. ive never heard of opednews and i doubt many people have too.
 
motorcyclist said:
the problem is that (as he put it) "it exists to exist". $70billion per year- there is a shitload of money going into this "war". So there are people out there making a lot of money. There are also a lot of people not making a lot of money, but rather just bringing home a paycheck. There are a lot of people that DEPEND on the drug war to feed their family.

It is big business. The original goal of "stopping drugs" has been replaced by the "business of pretending to stop drugs". A $70 billion dollar a year industry is not going to just cease to exist unfortunately.

Excellent point. However, there are dickheads who perpetuate this nonsense knowing full well the cruel effects of their broken policies, like DEA head Karen Tandy. I really don't know how the higher ups like her can sleep at night.
 
BSM, I'm glad you come here for news, but we all know that The Daily and Colbert are watched by potheads. Now get the LEAP people on the Today Show....
 
Even if the Stewart and Colbert shows are not the most influencial media source, they reach a greater audience than little editorials like this. I think they would be the next step up.
and not just pot heads. my grandma(not a smoker) even likes the daily show. And colbert got 100 most influencial people in the US in times magazine. When colbert says something that concerns conservatives, they listen and try to copy what he does. Hell, Fox even tried to spawn their own version of Daily Show, but failed miserably. This just shows they feel threatened.
 
The fact of the matter is, the Daily Show has a larger audience of Americans under 30 than any other news source. This is a very important demographic, full of naive eyes, not accustomed to seeing the propaganda of blatant lies of the past, willing to believe the truth when it's presented to them. These are the future leaders of America, who will act upon their ideologies when their day comes. To say that LEAP would not be appropriate for Stewart or Colbert's shows is just ludicrous. These men are extremely effective at manipulating public opinion to suit their agendas - thankfully I agree with most of what they say. Hell, if Colbert can influence his viewers to name a bridge in Hungary after him (which he did), I'm sure he and Stewart could do great things for LEAP's cause.
 
This is true! It is the only un-biased news source that i can think of. I also like to see clips of George Bush making an ass of himself while i'm getting high
 
Trogdor said:
The fact of the matter is, the Daily Show has a larger audience of Americans under 30 than any other news source. This is a very important demographic, full of naive eyes, not accustomed to seeing the propaganda of blatant lies of the past, willing to believe the truth when it's presented to them. These are the future leaders of America, who will act upon their ideologies when their day comes. To say that LEAP would not be appropriate for Stewart or Colbert's shows is just ludicrous. These men are extremely effective at manipulating public opinion to suit their agendas - thankfully I agree with most of what they say. Hell, if Colbert can influence his viewers to name a bridge in Hungary after him (which he did), I'm sure he and Stewart could do great things for LEAP's cause.

Right on.
 
I'm honestly really suprised that Stewart hasn't had LEAP on yet - everyone already knows he's a fan of the herb. Maybe we could start an email campaign to get him to get LEAP on to promote their new documentary film they made or something like that. What do you guys think? I think it's win-win. :D
 
Trogdor said:
I'm honestly really suprised that Stewart hasn't had LEAP on yet - everyone already knows he's a fan of the herb. Maybe we could start an email campaign to get him to get LEAP on to promote their new documentary film they made or something like that. What do you guys think? I think it's win-win. :D



I say go for it.
There's a bunch of stuff trying to get Ron Paul on the Daily show... "send an email to Comedy Central" stuff...

If it works, I say give it a shot.

If it doesn't work...
Well... give it a shot anyway.
It's takes about what?
20 seconds to go to Comedy Central, find the "Contact link" and type in, "Please put a LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition) on the Daily show!"
 
Trogdor said:
I'm honestly really suprised that Stewart hasn't had LEAP on yet - everyone already knows he's a fan of the herb. Maybe we could start an email campaign to get him to get LEAP on to promote their new documentary film they made or something like that. What do you guys think? I think it's win-win. :D

Thats a good idea, we should look into it.

A second thought:
I wonder if the LEAP guys would drop by the forum for an Q/A session if we asked?
 
I bet they would - positive exposure is always good. Whether or not they would want to associate with the average user of a forum highly sympathetic to drug use is a different question though - this is very rocky ground and getting the right kind of PR could make or break their cause. They'd probably only want to do Q/A with the admins and mods. But hey, what do I know, I do not represent LEAP.
 
what would interviewing one of them on this forum accomplish? Only drug users would see it.

id rather focus on getting all the members of this forum to email comedy central and request a LEAP member on the show.
 
Blacksoulman said:
what would interviewing one of them on this forum accomplish? Only drug users would see it.

id rather focus on getting all the members of this forum to email comedy central and request a LEAP member on the show.


However having the Q&A here then having them mention it on TDS....
That'd be nice :D

There's a lot of stuff here people should see.

Mods - your servers up to the influx of traffic? :D
 
Top