• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The Clinton Discussion Thread

and regarding Q (Qanon) - IMO it's a government psy-op that is connected to the Trump administration in some way. The "Q army" (which is growing daily) have been following Q's online posts/drops since Oct '17. They are cryptic enough to allow the followers to find clues and confirmations - but some of the confirmations have been impressive, such as dropping a post at the same time Trump dropped a tweet (10 sec delta). Q also seemed to predict the North Korea situation.

I personally think it's truth mixed with lies meant to hook in people and keep them distracted/waste their time. Q has made people think that Obama, Hillary and the whole deep state is gonna collapse and the gang will be shipped off to Gitmo. Some people say Q is just 4chan LARPer but I think it's definitely govt or intel-related. It reads like military intel

What I find most strange about this is that the mainstream media have written over 1,000 articles mentioning Q and calling it a conspiracy theory - but not one reporter has bothered to ask Trump or Sanders about it. They could destroy the whole thing with one question but they do not. This reinforces the legitimacy of Q for the followers, and it leads me to believe that the MSM may even be in on it in some way.

https://qanon.pub/

^all the posts if you wanna check it out

WWG1WGA = Where We Go One, We Go All

Frequent Q catchphrases are "trust the plan" and "disinformation is necessary".
Very clever as the source is now unfalsifiable.
 
Yeah what about the top-secret emails though. That isn't a conspiracy theory. That exchange should be front-page news.
 
JGrimez said:
and regarding Q (Qanon) - IMO it's a government psy-op that is connected to the Trump administration in some way. The "Q army" (which is growing daily) have been following Q's online posts/drops since Oct '17. They are cryptic enough to allow the followers to find clues and confirmations - but some of the confirmations have been impressive, such as dropping a post at the same time Trump dropped a tweet (10 sec delta). Q also seemed to predict the North Korea situation.

I personally think it's truth mixed with lies meant to hook in people and keep them distracted/waste their time. Q has made people think that Obama, Hillary and the whole deep state is gonna collapse and the gang will be shipped off to Gitmo. Some people say Q is just 4chan LARPer but I think it's definitely govt or intel-related. It reads like military intel

What I find most strange about this is that the mainstream media have written over 1,000 articles mentioning Q and calling it a conspiracy theory - but not one reporter has bothered to ask Trump or Sanders about it. They could destroy the whole thing with one question but they do not. This reinforces the legitimacy of Q for the followers, and it leads me to believe that the MSM may even be in on it in some way.

https://qanon.pub/

^all the posts if you wanna check it out

WWG1WGA = Where We Go One, We Go All

Frequent Q catchphrases are "trust the plan" and "disinformation is necessary".
Very clever as the source is now unfalsifiable.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
JGrimez said:
and regarding Q (Qanon) - IMO it's a government psy-op that is connected to the Trump administration in some way. The "Q army" (which is growing daily) have been following Q's online posts/drops since Oct '17. They are cryptic enough to allow the followers to find clues and confirmations - but some of the confirmations have been impressive, such as dropping a post at the same time Trump dropped a tweet (10 sec delta). Q also seemed to predict the North Korea situation.
Click to expand...

Is this supposed to imply that Trump's twitter is compromised, or that it isn't even him? Or that Trump is part of this disinformation campaign against himself? Similarly, if this source predicted the North Korea situation, dpoes that imply Trump is "in on it"? I don't get it.

I've never heard of Qanon until now.
 
I keep thinking that it would be totally awesome if someone made a TV show or something about if all the radical right wing conspiracy theories were true.

The main character would of course be trump, with Clinton and Obama being two of the villians. The show would follow trumps heroic fight against the agenda of the deep state satanic cannibal globalists with the help of right wing conspiracy theorists around the world.

President trump, superhero, greatest president ever and all around very handsome man. Fighting the evils of Clinton and her hoards of satanic cannabal child trafficking pedophiles in the deep state.

Come on, it'd be awesome. :D

Id watch it.
 
Hmm, I suppose either could work but I'm leaning towards live action.

Seeing Hillary Clinton slowly go insane because of her cannabalism, Obama would of course then have her killed in a cliffhanger. In the end though it'd be like 24 where every villian winds up being a pawn of a greater villian. So in the end the real villian would probably be Satan himself. :)

Meanwhile trump would engage in a valiant fight against the deep state globalist agenda. Leaving cryptic messages for those heroic men and women in the public to decrypt and expose the evils of satanic globalism. All the while surrounded at all sides by agents of the deep state like the UN and CIA and their poor brainwashed pawns the democrats and liberals.

The show would be named "the storm". Who wouldn't pay to watch that? :D
 
^I'm fairly confident Obama facilitated human trafficking. Why would he spend "$65,000 of taxpayer money" flying in "pizza and hotdogs from Chicago" to a private party in the White House when all food must be made on-site for security? Why so much money on just pizza and hot dogs? And why not use a DC restaurant? Then one of the people speaking of this asked "assume we are using the same channels?" (via Wikileaks). Then there's also people talking about how amazing the hot dogs were - these people are obviously not passionately emailing back and forth talking about pizza and hot dogs. Any drug user can instantly tell that they're using a code when reading the emails (what the code is referring to is another story).

Shadowmeister said:
Is this supposed to imply that Trump's twitter is compromised, or that it isn't even him? Or that Trump is part of this disinformation campaign against himself? Similarly, if this source predicted the North Korea situation, dpoes that imply Trump is "in on it"? I don't get it.

I've never heard of Qanon until now.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised you haven't heard of it, just Google News "Qanon". The MSM is all over it.

What the Q followers will claim is this: "The team behind the Q drops is around 5-10 people, some military intelligence, some linked to Trump. One of them may be Trump - but Trump is definitely involved. It's a way to pass sensitive information to his followers without violating national security or classified laws. That's another reason why some of the information is posed as a question or in the form of codes/riddles."

I will say that "Q" has brought a lot of sensitive issues to people's minds who would not have been exposed before or accepted it. But the whole thing just smells like psy-op
 
|~~ANT~~| said:
I disagree. The comparison serves a purpose. Grimey was attempting to expose a bias. (Not sure why he was banned. People have insulted him way more than he has insulted anyone from what I've seen. But, I guess he doesn't bother to report it because it's often CEP staff insulting him... Kind of like how people don't call the police to report that the police are corrupt as fuck.) Anyway, I think his point was: if Trump says/does something, it's so much worse than if Obama/Clinton does the same thing. Whether or not they're president at the moment is irrelevant. She's a former secretary of state and she was the last democratic nominee. Her behaviour isn't beyond criticism. There were only two options for president in 2016. What she said was clearly way more racist than anything Trump has ever said (no supposition necessary). So, we ended up with the less-racist president... Obviously this is relevant.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
JessFR said:
I keep thinking that it would be totally awesome if someone made a TV show or something about if all the radical right wing conspiracy theories were true.

The main character would of course be trump, with Clinton and Obama being two of the villians. The show would follow trumps heroic fight against the agenda of the deep state satanic cannibal globalists with the help of right wing conspiracy theorists around the world.

President trump, superhero, greatest president ever and all around very handsome man. Fighting the evils of Clinton and her hoards of satanic cannabal child trafficking pedophiles in the deep state.

Come on, it'd be awesome. :D

Id watch it.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't believe that Trump is likely such a hero, but as for the rest, I think it would be a horribly depressing, extremely terrifying film, if it accurately portrayed the true evil NWO agenda/s. I refuse to accept that a happy ending/victory is impossible, but I think it will get REALLY bad for a long time before it starts getting better.
 
Former FBI Lawyer James Baker Originally Believed Hillary Clinton Should Be Charged
https://saraacarter.com/former-fbi-...y-believed-hillary-clinton-should-be-charged/

Former FBI General Counsel James Baker originally believed Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of highly classified information was “alarming” and “appalling.” At the time, he believed her use of a private server to send the classified emails was sufficient enough to secure an indictment to possibly charge her for violations under the Espionage Act, for mishandling sensitive government documents.

Baker held onto that belief until shortly before his former boss FBI Director James Comey made the public announcement not to charge Clinton on July 5, 2017. He said he changed his position only after arguing and discussing the situation over a period of time with senior colleagues at the bureau, to include Comey. Comey, however, had already written an early draft in May, exonerating Clinton and changing “grossly negligent,” a legal term for mishandling classified information to “extremely careless,” according to drafts obtained by the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2017.
Click to expand...
 
Hillary Clinton’s Emails Were Sent to Gmail Address Similar to Name of Chinese Company

m.theepochtimes.com

Hillary Clinton’s Emails Were Sent to Gmail Address Similar to Name of Chinese Company

Hillary Clinton’s Emails Were Sent to Gmail Address Similar to Name of a Chinese Company
m.theepochtimes.com m.theepochtimes.com

"All but four of the 30,490 emails from Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized email server were forwarded to a private Google email address featuring a name similar to a Chinese company, according to documents released by a Senate committee on Aug. 15.

Virtually every email that was sent to and from the Clinton-email server was forwarded to “[email protected],” which raised concerns that a foreign actor gained access to Clinton’s emails after an intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) investigator searched Google for “Carter Heavy Industries” and came up with a result for Shandong Carter Heavy Industry Co., Ltd, according to the documents (pdf)."

This included classified documents and "above top secret" SAPs. This is far beyond criminal gross negligence and bordering on treasonous. It doesn't make sense that someone would do this accidentally, so if it was on purpose, could Clinton have received compensation for sharing all this sensitive info?
 
JGrimez said:
forwarded to a private Google email address featuring a name similar to a Chinese company,
Click to expand...

Pretty crude, forwarding to an identifiable email address. We know the server was hacked, I'd have expected the hackers to be better at trying to hide their fingerprints and just copying stuff off. Perhaps this is an intentional red herring? And if so, by whom?
 
How much do we care about vote-rigging and election interference? Not much at all, we only care when the accusations are helping Trump and the perpetrators are Russian.

"Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought!" the president tweeted."
Click to expand...

pjmedia.com

'I AM NOT SUICIDAL,' Says Man Who Exposed Hillary's Ties to Google

pjmedia.com pjmedia.com
'I AM NOT SUICIDAL,' Says Man Who Exposed Hillary's Ties to Google
 
Last edited:
To be fair I'd be allowed to do it in the Clinton thread.

P.s Hillary Clinton is more of a cunt than Trump.
 
Isn't it exciting that Hillary Clinton may run again!!!??

We get to re-live all of her scandals XD
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top