But, if you really feel the need, and think you can't get by, and it's for short term use, then maybe a benzo with less strength and abuse potential could help. Stuff like oxazepam, temaz and I'm very hesitant to say (due to past abuse) but good old fashion diazepam.
Yeah, this pretty much sums it up nicely I think.
It's hypocritical for me to be preaching about using responsible benzo use, when I've got myself a habit again (this one the worst yet by far); but on the other hand, I'm in a good position to comment having been both a stupidly irresponsible user of benzos for recreational purposes, as well as having used them exactly as prescribed for short periods when it was needed.
Everyone's different, but I think diazepam is THE benzo for short term maintenance of general anxiety while other options (therapy, anti-depressants, herbal remedies, etc) are explored.
Diazepam works. Some need more than others, but it works. For acute panic attacks there's things like alprazolam, which again are invaluable in cases of severe (as in genuine) panic attack. This may not be a popular opinion, but I don't think that alprazolam should be scripted with repeats, or more than a few pills for emergency situations. It boggles the mind that a potent, short-acting benzo with extreme side effects and rebound anxiety after extended use would be prescribed on a regular basis.
Again, however, everyone's different and I don't want to offend people with that comment. I know for some people alpraz is the only thing that works for them, and it is a necessary thing.
I just find the idea of powerful, short-acting benzos on repeat script a recipe for making a bad situation worse.
Lastly, there is an RC benzo called Pyrazolam, and I'll be damned if it isn't the only benzo I've ever tried that does NOTHING WHATSOEVER other than kill anxiety. It really works. It is often sold in tablets which contain 500mcg which is kind of stupid because it's not that strong, but 1.5 or 3mg or pyraz has killed my anxiety so cleanly that I simply forgot it was there.
It's not recreational at all, IME. If you don't have anxiety, you won't feel a damn thing from it. It's not attractive because it only negates, it doesn't bring in relaxation and disinhibition. This is my experience. Maybe others have had different experiences.
But it begs the question: Why isn't that the first line of treatment for acute anxiety in the medical world? It doesn't impair motor coordination unless taken in VERY high doses, it has minimal effect on short term memory....
Anyone else had good/bad experiences with it?