When a large group of appalled people stand by and say nothing, that's called negligence.
Maybe they are talking about it yet how would anyone know since the media would be focussed on the story thats hit the headlines rather than people going about their daily lives?
Also, banning his social media accounts isn't the greatest idea since its the most direct way of seeing any response at all from the public?
As the article says, the support Trump wanted was to support the legal way of questioning the vote, all those lawsuits apparently didn't even get read (I think this is bs, legally a judge must read all paperwork put in front of him)
I recall similar accusations of election rigging coming from the democrats, even people here who are adamant this election was fair without batting an eyelid reckoned that election was rigged .
Another pretty good read from a source I won't verify as trusted as I dont trust any news tbh- plays a bit of a devils advocate in this situation.
The US President's dangerous delusions and his crazed followers should remind us that America has always teetered on the edge of collapse, writes Stan Grant.
www.abc.net.au
The tools bar at the top of this isn't working, no idea why, if not linking copy paste and read this.
What I would like to know is why he was not immediately removed for inciting violence?
The answer would be that he wanted a march on the capitol and to fight for either him or democracy, dunno what he tweeted exactly. The guy got censored because of what might happen if dumbasses read it, should have banned the accounts of the rioters since the news here implies all heads of state everywhere might lose their accounts now. Not that I care.
That did not specifically state "siege", or breaking laws. A march is a march, not a full on riot. Marches hapoen all the time.
So now the democrats control the whole thing, that is most definitely not good for any democracy and what happens there now both good and bad is going to have to be on them.
There won't be any finger pointing at the "evil republicans" and good luck finding anyone who would break ranks to criticise them even if america ends up in an economic depression while the politicians are too busy on identity politics.
There's been no mention of that affidavit from the election worker, its probably bullshit.
The voting system is stupid, it is here too and there won't be an overhaul anyway since elections are just for show. Politicians can easily work amongst themselves to keep themselves in power or thwart opposition to suit themselves.
"Negligence" implies people could have done something but that isn't realistic as no one really listens to them.
