• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Election 2020 The 2020 Candidates: Right, Left and Center!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gates actually does a lot with his money, he's done more to fight malaria than any other person or organization. But yeah, Bezos, no.

I doubt Bloomberg has a chance to win, although to be honest I don't know a whole lot about him.
Have you watched the 3 part series on Netflix with bill gates? . He has done some amazing things for 3rd world countries, science and technology as a whole . I’m not saying he’s a saint but I’m sure he spends a lot more on solving real world problems like you said malaria , polio etc.... then the taxes he currently pays which are still huge sums of money . As opposed to a bunch of billionaires saying there ok with some of the wealth tax ideas floating around I feel like gates is ok with some but still wants to be able to be in control of where the money goes and how it gets spent . In my opinion a big wealth tax can backfire in the sense that big philanthropists such as gates and buffet will scale back on there philanthropy if you start taxing them unfairly just because they busted there ass there whole lives to become who they are today . I don’t know much about benzos and if he’s also into philanthropy so I can’t comment on him .
I also highly doubt Bloomberg has any real shot at all. I keep trying to think to myself what his game plan is cuz I don’t think it’s to win . I doubt he’s stupid enough to believe that. but I do believe that he’s smart enough to have an alternative motive . Now to figure out what it is 🙄
 
Last edited:
Gates actually does a lot with his money, he's done more to fight malaria than any other person or organization. But yeah, Bezos, no.

I doubt Bloomberg has a chance to win, although to be honest I don't know a whole lot about him.

Yeah, sorry if I'm a good deal skeptical. I realize that people like Gates and Warren contribute a huge amount of their wealth to pet projects but they still largely remain this big gaping philosophical hole, namely that charity has been around for hundreds of years and there is still plenty of poverty and hunger.

I'd rather just take their money.
 
Yeah, sorry if I'm a good deal skeptical. I realize that people like Gates and Warren contribute a huge amount of their wealth to pet projects but they still largely remain this big gaping philosophical hole, namely that charity has been around for hundreds of years and there is still plenty of poverty and hunger.

I'd rather just take their money.
Why can’t you just make some of your own money and possibly try to contribute 1/inifinity of what gates or buffet have done for this world . What would you like for him to do ? Bankrupt himself ?. He’s rich enough for 100 lifetimes and If I were him I would also trust the way I spend my money more then any crooked politician . Yes I do believe all politicians including trump are somewhat crooked the only question is how crooked . Like my father always taught me , there’s a thief that steals cuz he’s greedy and then there’s a thief with a heart that steals just enough to get by. I’m not saying I agree with either but that is sadly the political world we currently live in .
Now back to Bloomberg , I am still interested to hear from some of the more vocal democrats on this site but it seems like there not very interested in posting in a thread that wasn’t started by a trump basher or it could also be the fact that I started it .Shall I recommend the next mod that reads this to erase my thread so they can start it and I can actually read some of your opinions on Bloomberg joining the race .
 
Last edited:
Many Trump supporters were so fed up by the status quo of wars and enriching the ultra wealthy at the expense of the world, and were disappointed by Obama, and bought into Trump being the guy to finally shake it up. Sadly, Trump is not that guy, he's just another crooked narcissistic rich guy, except in his case he's got no fucking clue how to run a country, his previous experience consisting of running businesses (sometimes successfully) and building a reality TV/media presence/personality. He's very good at knowing how to get people to pay attention to him. He's never had anything to do whatsoever with stuff like being the commander in chief of the US military. He has no clue how to command the respect of world leaders. The man should not be in charge of the "leader of the free world" (if we even are that anymore). A lot of people have dug in their heels because to be wrong means they supported this asshattery. The damage will be felt in the years to come.
 
^hasn't started any new wars though and has de-escalated a few. Obama started many. Trump has exposed how many Dems don't actually care about slowing the war machine, they simply hate Trump to the point that they refuse to give him credit for less war. I find this type of behavior disgusting. I think Hillary is a demon but if she took the same actions I would give her credit (while being extremely surprised).

In regards to Bloomberg:

"Can you discuss why you appear in Epstein’s little black book?
America is over people who think having some fiat means they can do anything. Why were you in pedo Epstein’s address book?" #LowEnergyMike
 

As the 2020 presidential election draws closer, it’s more important than ever for Democrats to put aside their differences to unite around my feckless centrist candidate. We must remember that this is simply not the time to discuss and debate the merits of each candidate to arrive at a popular consensus pick. That sort of “primarying” isn’t helpful in a primary election, as it will only result in the most popular candidate winning the nomination, which isn’t my feckless centrist.

You might think that the candidate voters select is self-evidently the best candidate to win the general, as they have already proven they have some sort of popular support. But what really wins elections is “electability.” Electability is a perfect metric I invented that rejects flawed models like polling data and past election results and favors the views of myself and other wealthy, white op-ed columnists. Yes, Bernie Sanders consistently polls as the most popular running Democrat, but that’s because most voters don’t understand that he’s not who most voters want. If you want to win elections, you have to listen to me. I know my stuff — you don’t get to where I am without graduating from Rich Kid Legacy Admissions University, interning at the Koch Brothers Institute for Promoting the Agenda of the Koch Brothers, and consulting for several prominent losing candidates.

Sure, it’d be nice to have a leftist in the Oval Office, but in the real world, an extremist wouldn’t stand a chance at becoming president. The American people like moderates. Just ask Jeb Bush, who cruised his way to an easy victory in the 2016 election. It’s what decades of behavioral science has told us — people are perfectly rational animals driven by an innate desire for compromise. It’s why sports fans cheer for good, clean play and games that end in ties. It’s why cereal commercials always have nutritional data front and center, while a voiceover calmly explains the cereal’s pros and cons. Voters don’t want someone championing radical policies that would directly improve their lives. They want a feckless centrist who’s only willing to sputter out vague platitudes for fear of alienating oil executives and white supremacists. That’s the feckless centrism that contributes to the proud American tradition of having one of the lowest voter turnouts among developed democracies!

You need to accept that we both want progress. I want Medicare For All (in a very limited form that will still let me sell prescription drugs at five hundred times the cost) and a Green New Deal (hopefully long after I’m dead and my children have secured their place in their hermetically-sealed bunker). The fact is, you can’t have progress too quickly. Progress doesn’t work like a nuclear bomb that goes off suddenly and changes the world overnight, like when we bombed Hiroshima and eighty thousand people died instantaneously. Real change, lasting change, happens in incremental steps over time. You know how when we bombed Hiroshima, thousands of civilians didn’t die outright, but rather, they were poisoned by radiation, causing constant and severe nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting over the course of a few agonizing, painful weeks, until all of their blood cells deteriorated and their bodies emaciated and died? That’s what progress looks like!

We’re fighting Donald Trump, people! Do you think a steady moral compass and ideological purity is going to beat back the rising tides of American fascism? No! It’s feckless centrism and incremental changes! Think back to how we stopped the Nazis — the Allies compromised with Hitler and allowed him to just do less of the Holocaust, incrementally scaling back on the genocide. And by 2002, all the concentration camps were closed and repurposed as Web 1.0 startups!

I understand that committing to this feckless centrism isn’t going to be easy. You’re going to hear a lot of purity political talking points this election cycle, like “we must do everything we can to fight climate change,” or “the electoral college doesn’t represent the will of the people and is inherently undemocratic,” or even, “it is morally wrong to put human children in cages.” You might even start to believe these things and imagine that a better world is possible. But just remember the lessons taught to us from all our favorite stories. The hero, when faced with incredible odds, looks deep within herself, musters all her remaining strength, and compromises.
 
Why can’t you just make some of your own money and possibly try to contribute 1/inifinity of what gates or buffet have done for this world . What would you like for him to do ? Bankrupt himself ?. He’s rich enough for 100 lifetimes and If I were him I would also trust the way I spend my money more then any crooked politician . Yes I do believe all politicians including trump are somewhat crooked the only question is how crooked . Like my father always taught me , there’s a thief that steals cuz he’s greedy and then there’s a thief with a heart that steals just enough to get by. I’m not saying I agree with either but that is sadly the political world we currently live in .
Now back to Bloomberg , I am still interested to hear from some of the more vocal democrats on this site but it seems like there not very interested in posting in a thread that wasn’t started by a trump basher or it could also be the fact that I started it .Shall I recommend the next mod that reads this to erase my thread so they can start it and I can actually read some of your opinions on Bloomberg joining the race .

You don't know me so what makes you assume that I come to this from a position of jealousy, a position of poverty, or a position of obscurity? I'm honestly curious.

Let me answer your question with a scenario. Do you work for someone or do you work for yourself? And if you work for yourself have you ever worked for someone else?

If you feel its necessary to erase your thread, by all means but my points about Bloomberg are deeply relevant to why I don't think he's qualified to be anything close to a position that will represent the populace of the United States.
 
He's done, right? This is one of the most outrageous things I've heard a politician publicly say, including all context and it wasn't a trap or anything.
 
I'll just paraphrase someone else I saw commenting on this online:

"Yep he's just what the voters are demanding, an effete New York billionaire who spent his vast wealth on efforts to take their guns."

I'm on the fence as to whether his candidacy is part of some master plan or just the result of stunning egotism/hubris
 
He's a typical asshole plutocrat, who tempers his authoritarianism with a sickening paternalism. He's the kind of guy who gladly pals around with tyrants while pretending to be morally elevated, can't stand people like him
 


LOL? This fucking guy is running for president? Very fitting that the head of IMF is clapping for more taxes too.


Jesus christ. I'm not really sure how the guy expects to have any chance. He spent a lot of money, though I guess to him it wasn't a big deal to spend a billion dollars.
 
Another wall street dickhead who made his money by fucking the entire world over the fucking asshole switches his party he runs for every election aswell to try suit what gives him a better chance of winning. He could by his own wealth wipeout starvation in Africa by putting his money into proper irrigation farming and food security or climate change but this dickhead has done nothing for actual human suffering. He would lose vs trump aswell since everybody knows bloomberg speaks lies and not his mind.
 
He wants a lot more immigration to improve our culture, and religion, because our culture and the religion here sucks. He's also one of the chosen. I absolutely think that God's chosen people should rule over us, over here. Let's let him improve our religion.

"to take all the different kinds of jobs that the country needs — improve our culture, our cuisine, our religion,..."
-Bloomberg

That's all we need is people not of our religion improving our religion? Hey Christians, your religion looks like it could use some improvement from Muslims?

He also said it's to improve our dialog. Because that's exactly what's going on. I'm so glad that some people know better for us - because we're certainly dumbasses.

Without their leading role, we will not survive.



I'm convinced.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top