• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The 2018 Trump Presidency thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
[tweet]1069584730880974849[/tweet]

"The U.S. spent 716 Billion Dollars this year. Crazy!"

crazy? really?

you mean the $716B you personally authorized and described as "the most significant investment in our military and our war fighters in modern history"?

at least he's a real straight-shooter and you always know where he stands on an issue :\

alasdair
 
The only people who aren't insulted by Trumps political being are well - off, and less offended by his non-sense

Just saying, he is a disgrace to the needy, he openly doesn't care
 
2 Attorneys General to Subpoena Trump Organization; Treasury

The attorneys general of the District of Columbia and Maryland plan to file subpoenas Tuesday seeking records from the Trump Organization, the Treasury Department and dozens of other entities as part of a lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of profiting off the presidency.

"We're seeking to confirm the information that everybody already knows: Trump's violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution," Frosh said. "He's received numerous payments from foreign governments and state governments and they've been funneled, at least in part, through the Trump (hotel) in D.C."

https://www.apnews.com/8335d630f04248fe9175f893c6641729
 
Trump is definitely vulnerable - the Republicans have tentatively begun to jump ship and Trump is decidedly less Trumpian atm.

Plus his approval rating and the stock market show a lack of confidence.

Watching Nikki Haley; she's definitely a contender with savvy. I don't see this Repbulican cycle ending with a woman, but if it does, unless she really falls flat, she's a heavyweight contender.

The big question: Trump has always been able to slither out of things. He can't ignore the Dems or Mueller, who is not a pushover to say the least. Will he fight or will he fall apart?
 
Flake stands firm on sending a ‘message to the White House’ on Mueller

Outgoing GOP Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) stands firm in blocking President Trump's judicial nominations until Senate leaders allow a vote on a bill to protect special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election hacking.
"The message that needs to be sent to the White House is that we do not have the president's back if he fires the special counsel,” Flake told reporters Thursday.


“There are a number of judges that we should be approving. There are number of them that are not controversial, that are being held up unfortunately - but this has to be priority,” the Judiciary Committee member said.


The retiring Arizona senator couldn’t say if GOP leadership would allow for a vote on the measure but for his part, Flake is "still encouraging the Majority Leader to bring this to a vote. We need to protect the special counsel."


Without Flake’s vote to move judicial nominations to the Senate floor, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) was forced to cancel a meeting set for Thursday morning in which nearly a dozen Trump nominees were set to be sent to the full Senate.


Flake, who has refused to approve the president’s judicial picks until the chamber debates and votes on a bipartisan measure to protect Mueller’s investigation, said “you have to take a stand.”


He explained “the urgency” of a vote on his bill “changed” when Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions and appointed Sessions’ former Chief of Staff Matt Whitaker to the position of acting attorney general.


Before returning to the Justice Department in the fall of 2017, Whitaker criticized the Mueller investigation and suggested methods by which to end it.


Flake said for somebody to have "oversight over the Mueller investigation that had already expressed hostility toward the Mueller investigation - I don't know how anybody can be okay with that.”


“To move on as if, you know, 'nothing’s changed,' and 'nobody's being fired,’ you know 'nothing to see here' – that's just not the case,” Flake added.


And this would mean something if the incoming Senate wasn't in Republican hands (53-47) and the Senate's Judiciary Committee wasn't in charge of confirmation. In other words, the Senate Judiciary Committee will confirm these judges to federal appointments in the first five minutes they can.


Jeff Flake, smh.
 
^ this, along with so many other things he says and does, is pandering to his loyal base only. they've already made their minds up and pretty much anything he does is ok with them.

the republicans, generally, can't be happy about this. this just reflects poorly on (the perception of) their ability to govern. after the huge hit they just took in the house midterms, this isn't going to help...

alasdair
 
Honestly I don't even really think of trump as a republican. I think of him more under his own informal party in a coalition government with the Republicans. That seems to better fit the situation we find ourselves in.

Which is why I think as soon as he becomes enough of a liability for Republicans, they'll turn on him. And as soon as supporters of trump realize they're going to get almost none of what they were promised. They'll turn on him too.
 
I'm sick of this ride but I don't know how to get off.

Same.

I just wish this term in office would just fucking finish already.

Not even my country and it's just so lame that this idiot even got nominated in the first place and it just shows that the Truman show is fast becoming (already is) reality.

Its bizarre.
 
The (first) video embedded in the article has the footage of Trump ranting about the wall and the shutdown after his "I-don't-know-anything-about-this-but-I'm-going-to-talk-about-the-criminal-justice-reform-proposal-and-the-farm-bill" intro/rambles.


It's worse than any descriptions and quotes I've seen. He seems angry and distracted (I wonder why...;)).


Trump bickers with Democratic leaders, threatens government shutdown

WASHINGTON — Bickering in public with Democratic leaders, President Donald Trump threatened repeatedly on Tuesday to shut down the government if Congress doesn’t provide the money he says is needed to build a wall at the Mexican border.


Trump’s comments came as he opened a contentious meeting with Democratic Senate and House leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, with partial shutdown looming on Dec. 21 when funding for some agencies will expire. The president and Pelosi tangled over whether the House or the Senate was holding up his proposal. Trump and Schumer jabbed at each other over the import of the midterm elections — and who will be blamed if a shutdown occurs.


“If we don’t get what we want, one way or the other, whether it’s through you, through military, through anything you want to call, I will shut down the government,” Trump ultimately declared. “I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down.”


The televised discussion was Trump’s first encounter with the newly empowered Democrats since their midterm victories in the House. It offered a remarkable public preview of how divided government might work — or break down — over the next two years as the 2020 presidential election nears.


After the public session, barely a half hour passed before the Democrats exited their private meeting with the president, issuing stern warnings.


“This Trump shutdown, this temper tantrum that he seems to throw, will not get him his wall and will hurt a lot of people,” said Schumer.


Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan acknowledged Tuesday that the GOP-led House has yet to pass legislation that includes the $5 billion in border wall funds that Trump has been requesting. Ryan likely lacks sufficient votes from Republicans who will lose their majority at the end of the month.


Trump is seeking far more for his long-stalled border wall than the $1.6 billion the Senate has agreed to for border security, including physical barriers and technology along the U.S. southern border.


The Oval Office meeting between Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and the Democrats began civilly, with Trump noting progress for bipartisan criminal justice legislation in the Senate. But the session quickly unraveled as he mentioned his promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.


Said Trump with a smile: “And then we have the easy one, the wall. That will be the easiest of all, what do you think Chuck?” Schumer shot back sternly: “It’s called funding the government.”


When Pelosi said he did not have that support in the House, Trump interjected: “Nancy, I do.”


Pelosi later said: “This has spiraled downwards.”


After Pelosi and Schumer noted Democratic success in the midterm elections, the president asked whether Republicans had won the Senate in the November election.


“When the president brags he has won North Dakota and Indiana, he’s in real trouble,” retorted Schumer with a smile.

Pelosi and Schumer have urged Trump to support a measure that includes a half-dozen government funding bills largely agreed upon by lawmakers, along with a separate measure that funds the Department of Homeland Security at current levels through Sept. 30. The homeland bill includes about $1.3 billion for fencing and other security measures at the border.


If Trump rejects that, Democrats are urging a continuing resolution that would fund all the remaining appropriations bills at current levels through Sept. 30.


“We gave the president two options that would keep the government open,” Pelosi and Schumer said in a statement after the meeting. “It’s his choice to accept one of those options or shut the government down.”

Pelosi, who is seeking to become House speaker when the new Congress convenes in January, said she and many other Democrats consider the wall “immoral, ineffective and expensive.” She noted that Trump promised during the 2016 campaign that Mexico would pay for the wall, an idea Mexico has repeatedly rejected.


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said circumstances were “beginning to resemble a movie we’ve seen before,” noting that Democrats forced a brief shutdown in January in a dispute over immigration policies.


“It didn’t work out very well,” McConnell said. “The reality is that the president’s request is entirely reasonable.”


Schumer and other Democrats supported a 2006 law that authorized hundreds of miles of fencing along the southern border, McConnell said, urging Democrats to again back physical barriers — by whatever name — along the border.


In a series of tweets earlier Tuesday, Trump said immigration and border patrol agents and thousands of active-duty service members he sent to the border have done a “FANTASTIC” job. But he said “A Great Wall would be, however, a far easier & less expensive solution.”


(Article text and two embedded videos at link)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top