cduggles
Bluelight Crew
Mal, no he wouldn't. Trump's base would be furious if we let all these 'MS-13 rapists and bad hombres' stay here!! #MAGA!
DANIEL DENVIR: I mean, political rhetoric around immigration so often functions to obscure the reality and history of immigration - though Trump is a rather extreme case. And what his obsessive focus on MS-13 does, aside from scapegoating and facilitating the mass criminalization of Latino immigrants in this country, is obscure the origins and reality of gangs like MS-13.
MS-13 was born in Los Angeles amidst the refugees fleeing President Reagan's dirty wars in El Salvador, and became a transnational gang that ultimately did so much to destabilize El Salvador precisely because of deportation policies pursued by President Trump's predecessors. This is a problem that's American-made through and through. So, to treat it as though it's some external threat being foisted on Americans, it not only entirely takes out of proportion and exaggerates the criminal threat that MS-13 poses to Americans, it obscures the fact that it's our foreign policies, our military interventions and our long history - that, unfortunately, well precedes Donald Trump - of mass deportations and criminalization of immigrants, that created MS-13 in the first place.
I saw an interview the other day with trump about 15 or 20 years ago.
He looked, acted and spoke so differently. He didn't seem so mentally deficient of incoherent.
A multi-billion dollar bankruptcy can change a person, huh?
He's always been this way.
Yeah well... not to defend the beast, but that's basic silver tongue retoric, used by politics since whenever, to hide the fact that they don ?t have an entire solution to a specific problem, trying to make forgetting that they ?re as lost as anyone.^ he doesn't make the slightest bit of effort, does he?
if i was a trump supporter, i can't help but think i'd find his dishonesty and half-arsed effort at doing his job would be insulting to my intelligence.
i wonder if any of them feel that way? i cannot imagine supporting someone so unconditionally. i think it is remarkably stupid.
no, i mean that he used to be capable of expressing himself verbally, without always changing the subject mid-sentence.
he speaks in broken-up fragments of syntax, and often struggles to stay on topic.
i don't think he's faking that - i think his jumbled word-salad speech peculiarities are neurological.
probably dementia.
frankly it would explain a lot.
he's always been a fucking asshole though - no disagreement there.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/06/26/supreme-court-upholds-trump-travel-ban/amp/
I was pretty sure this would be the out come. I think it will be interesting to see if conservative judges start obstructing when a democratic administration comes in, and challenging the presidents EOs for political gain. Hope not, but that seems to be the nature of Washington sadly.
But... but... the stock market is at all all-time high because of Trump and only because of Trump! It's not like it was already on its trajectory before he got into office! Investors are very confident when they see the ship is being manned by a narcissistic egomaniacal old man whose level of consistency is on par with a child's!
WHAT IS HAPPENING????!!??? ...Oh wait, it's HILARY, she sent her child sex slaves to infiltrate the stock market. And the deep state is spreading FAKE NEWS that Trump started this trade war! Okay I feel better now.
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement Wednesday, giving President Donald Trump a golden chance to cement conservative control of the high court. The 81-year-old Kennedy said in a statement he is stepping down after more than 30 years on the court.
A Republican appointee, he has held the key vote on such high-profile issues as abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, guns, campaign finance and voting rights.
Kennedy that his retirement will take effect at the end of July, and Mr. Trump said his search for a new justice would begin "immediately." Without Kennedy, the court will be split between four liberal justices who were appointed by Democratic presidents and four conservatives who were named by Republicans.
Mr. Trump's nominee is likely to give the conservatives a solid majority and will face a Senate process in which Republicans hold the slimmest majority, but Democrats can't delay confirmation.
Mr. Trump's first high court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, was confirmed in April 2017. If past practice is any indication, Mr. Trump will name a nominee within weeks, setting in motion a process that could allow confirmation by the time the court reconvenes in early October.
Mr. Trump already has a list of 25 candidates -- 24 judges and Utah Sen. Mike Lee -- and has said he would choose a nominee from that list.
CBS News' Ed O'Keefe reports that Lee said he would accept a nomination to serve on the United States Supreme Court, if asked by Mr. Trump. Lee, 47, has served in the Senate since 2011 and he's clerked twice for Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito, once while the justice served on the high court and previously when Alito served on the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Abortion is likely to be one of the flash points in the nomination fight. Kennedy has mainly supported abortion rights in his time on the court, and Mr. Trump has made clear he would try to choose justices who want to overturn the landmark abortion rights case of Roe v. Wade. Such a dramatic step may not be immediately likely, but a more conservative court might be more willing to sustain abortion restrictions.
Interest groups across the political spectrum are expected to mobilize to support and fight the nomination because it is so likely to push the court to the right.
Republicans currently hold a bare 51-49 majority in the Senate, although that includes the ailing Sen. John McCain of Arizona. If Democrats stand united in opposition to Mr. Trump's choice, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky can lose no more than one vote. If the Senate divides 50-50, Vice President Mike Pence could break a tie to confirm the nominee.
Democrats are already advocating postponing a vote on Justice Kennedy's replacement until after the midterms. Republican leadership wouldn't allow President Barack Obama's pick to the bench, Merrick Garland, to get a hearing before the Senate, arguing that it was too close to the 2016 election.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer took note of the Republican's past efforts when he spoke on the Senate floor on Wednesday.
"Our Republican colleagues in the Senate should follow the rule they set in 2016: Not to consider a Supreme Court justice in an election year," said Schumer. He added, "Millions of people are just months away from determining senators who should vote to confirm or reject the President's nominee. And their voices deserve to be heard now as Leader McConnell said they deserve to be heard then. Anything but that would be the absolute height of hypocrisy."
Prominent on the list of possible successors are Judges Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania and William Pryor of Alabama, who was seriously considered for the seat eventually filled by Gorsuch, and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who serves on the federal appeals court in Washington.
Kavanaugh is a longtime Washington insider, having served as a law clerk to Kennedy and then as a key member of independent counsel Kenneth Starr's team that produced the report that served as the basis for President Bill Clinton's impeachment. In October, Kavanaugh dissented when his court ruled that a teenage migrant in federal custody should be able to obtain an abortion immediately.
Regardless of who replaces him, Kennedy's departure will be a massive change for the high court, where he has been the crucial swing vote for more than a decade. He has sided with the liberal justices on gay rights and abortion rights, as well as some cases involving race, the death penalty and the rights of people detained without charges at the Guantanamo Bay naval base. He has written all the court's major gay-rights decisions, including the 2015 ruling that declared same-sex marriage is a constitutional right nationwide.
However, he also has been a key vote when conservatives have won major rulings on the outcome of the 2000 presidential election in favor of George W. Bush, gun rights, limiting regulation of campaign money and gutting a key provision of the landmark federal Voting Rights Act.
There were no outward signs that Kennedy was getting ready to retire. He had hired his allotment of four law clerks for the term that begins in October and he is planning to spend part of the summer as he typically does, teaching a law school class in Salzburg, Austria.
But several former law clerks have said that Kennedy, a nominee of President Ronald Reagan, preferred to be replaced by a Republican. Control of the Senate is at stake in the November elections, and if Democrats capture the majority, Mr. Trump could find it difficult to get his choice confirmed.
Few obstacles seem to stand in the way of confirming Kennedy's replacement before the court reconvenes in October. Republicans changed the rules during Gorsuch's confirmation to wipe out the main delaying tactic for Supreme Court nominees, the filibuster, and the need for 60 votes to defeat it.
The other two older justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, and Stephen Breyer, 79, are Democratic appointees who would not appear to be going anywhere during a Trump administration if they can help it.