Nicomorphinist
Bluelighter
well, i only crush my kadian and take it that way, from i notice is that, 20-40min in, it starts to kick in, but come 40-60min it's full force for a good 2-4 hours and slowly fades over about 6-8 hours
but along the original question i was wondering if in any way possible am i losing out on potential more morphine to absorb somewhere along the way because as a rule i try not to spare any painkilling effect i can get out of my meds
im sure my doctor knows i do this but has never mentioned anything because he knows my struggle - possibly why he writes me rx's for 3 different opiates who knows
but i do know that i suppose i get enough pain relief, at the same time i don't i hate chronic pain.. it's a rollercoaster of relief and suffering :/
The 8 hour total duration of action could also be the result of your metabolism and/or tolerance to the morphine -- it actually is fairly uncommon for a 12-hour formulation to last 12 hours, and certainly to continue to do so . . . 8 hours is more common, and I have heard of 6 hour intervals, or 10 hour intervals with a smaller ER tablet like a third to half the dose of the other at 5 hours . . .
Now, of course, they do work as advertised for some, and many work better as the drug chronically builds up in the body. One surprise I had was that the original Opana lasted 12 hours for the first weeks then actually lengthened to where I could, if I wanted to do so in order to prove it, go up to 36 hours betwixt doses, which also may have been the large doses of misoprostol and antacids I was taking at the time. It all turned out to be difficult for the doctor, chemist, and myself and helpers to manage, so it was on to all Opana IR (which also could last up to 11 hours for some reason) and then Numorphan ampoules with Dilaudid tablets and a somewhat good trial with Palladone capsules, then the hydromorphone/oxymorphone combination and switching to MST Continus and hydromorphinol ampoules when I was back in Europe.
There is also a huge variation in how well various manufacturers' ER tablets work -- I have always insisted on Mallinckrodt and Mundipharma in those cases and hear all sorts of stories about others, including other forms that are just as good, but others which have all sorts of problems with them as well. Once I heard of someone who got hypodermic tablets of hydromorphone, and one month the prescription was filled with some new crap that a company came up with to keep oral prescription patients from using them in a manner inconsistent with their labelling, and she was in hospital for Stage III withdrawal and chest pain from angina pectoris in about 36 hours and the places she tried to use them like the regular stuff gave her Cotton Fever and a prolonged adventure with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus mixed with Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, and Clostridium spp and other problems . . . I suppose if one lives in the right place that kind of thing could have them winning the Vibrio vulnificus Reichelt 1976 or Escherchia coli Castellani & Chalmers 1919 serotype O157:H7 lottery . . . I was copy editing a harm reduction booklet a little while ago which listed amongst the possible injection-related infections all five forms of malaria, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, rabies, and gas gangrene . . . Jesus Christ -- so who are the politicians who think the harm reduction approach is bad for people?
Last edited: