I agree with Huaca on a number of issues. If government cannabis is legalized outright, government overregulation might fuck things up. The idea the founding fathers had in founding this country was establishing a land of the free. The aristocrats that founded this country didn't necessarily believe the people could be counted on to make decissions in their own best interests. Hence the establishment of the electoral college and other vestiges of feudilism or lord daddy knows best. However, many of the founders of this country fought shoulder to shoulder with the farmers and blacksmiths, shopowners, and rumrunners, ect... that through off the yoke of Grand Britania's tyrany and began to see the resourcefulness and capacity for free thought of this new nation of free citizens. Some of the more elightened (like Jefferson and Madison) had faith in their fellow countrymen and their ability to know what is in their own best interest- seeing government as a measns of facilitating the persuit of life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness as well as keeping people free of coercsion when the 2nd amendment wasn't enough. (hense 1st 10 amendments of the US Constitution).
Today: More and more we are moving toward a society of government, big daddy in washington or sac knows best. Alaska in 75' had a good model of decriminalization.
But there is another side of me that respects the french concept of terroir/appelations and AVAs in the CA wine industry and would like to see an analougous model be developed here. But, at there core, such models are anti libertarian. But, what one grows on there own land for personal use should never be taxed nor regulated by any government agency from the feds to city councils, to farmers guilds.