Senate passes bill opens door to suing drug dealers (US:NH)

E-llusion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Messages
5,975
Location
ALASKA
Babies hurt by their mother’s illegal drug use and parents who pay for a child’s drug rehabilitation could sue drug dealers under a bill passed Wednesday by the Senate.

If enacted into law, New Hampshire would join about 15 states that make it easier to hold drug dealers liable in civil courts. The House next considers the bill.

Municipalities, other agencies and employers also could sue dealers after they’ve been convicted of possession, manufacture or distribution of drugs.

The Drug Dealer Liability Act is model legislation intended as a deterrent, particularly to small-time dealers who own property. It’s also intended to encourage users to identify and seek payment for drug treatment from their dealers.

The New Hampshire version would restrict civil liability to dealers of cocaine, cocaine derivatives, heroin and ecstasy, said Sen. Robert Clegg, R-Hudson. When dealers are sued, they could in turn sue their sources which would disrupt distribution networks.

Under Michigan’s law, siblings of a drug addicted baby got a $1 million judgment and Detroit got an award of more than $7 million to help combat drug activity. A South Dakota jury awarded a woman whose husband was killed by a driver under the influence of methamphetamine a $268 million judgment against the dealer who supplied the drugs.

In Indiana, several families sued a doctor this summer who was convicted of illegally distributing OxyContin.

Critics in other states note that in spite of substantial awards, few have collected the money so the awards are largely symbolic.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate passes bill opens door to suing drug dealers

By Anne Saunders
Associated Press
Portsmouth, NH, USA

Source
 
Babies hurt by their mother’s illegal drug use... could sue drug dealers under a bill passed Wednesday by the Senate.

Of course, it's not the mother's fault she did drugs and harmed her baby. Who else can we blame besides the person who actually committed the harmful action?!?!? Let's blame the next door neighbors too.
 
Ok this is really dumb, let's sue those Columbian Cartels eh ?


When dealers are sued, they could in turn sue their sources which would disrupt distribution networks.

8(
 
This is seriously the dumbest thing I've ever heard of, and I've heard of some seriously dumb shit.

I don't know how to phrase this, but I thought you weren't allowed to sue someone over illegal acts. Also why wouldn't the user also be named in the lawsuit? All shit like this does is even further diminish personal responsiblility. Hell why don't these parents also sue themselves? They have the responsiblility of raising their child and to keep them out of harms way - not the drug dealer. It wasn't until I moved out of my mothers house that I started using and that was just a respect thing.
 
This is great news guys! I'm gonna buy a shitload of drugs, then "get caught" and sue the hell outta the drug dealer! I'm gonna be rich.
 
Sweet, now we can team up .. one person beats up their friend, then their friend sues a random drug dealer, and the friends split a multi-million dollar pot.
Free drugs for all!
 
does this law or propossed law just eefect thos dealers in Nh or will this be a 50 state law or states particiate at will.
 
Crazeee said:
When dealers are sued, they could in turn sue their sources which would disrupt distribution networks.


LMAO. Yeah, let me take my higher in the drug food chain dealer to court. Like ratting, but you get to have money as well. I'm sure I wouldn't be living my life in fear, waiting for a couple of pipe-hittin' n*ggas to knock on my door and start goin to work on my ass with a pair of pliers and a blow torch. BTW thats a quote not racism...
 
^^Aimed at Mr soon to be living the rest of his short ass life in agonizing pain Rapist over here ?? ;)

On topic the article sucks ass and is THE stupidest thing I ahve read ALL week

nuff said
 
technically, once the dealer has you on drugs, he has you in a sort of latent mind control where your only object is the drug and you have no choice or control over your body and mind, which now function automatically and without 'your' consent. this should open up the door for all sorts of hostage situations - ie "sir release the junkie from your chemical grip, or we will be forced to open fire"

POW
 
the NH bill hasn't even passed yet, and if it does, i doubt most or any others will follow.
 
alostlittlebird said:
technically, once the dealer has you on drugs, he has you in a sort of latent mind control where your only object is the drug and you have no choice or control over your body and mind, which now function automatically and without 'your' consent. this should open up the door for all sorts of hostage situations - ie "sir release the junkie from your chemical grip, or we will be forced to open fire"

POW

that's funny a fuck, what would be the senerio if you have more than one hook-up?
 
Well if you had more than one hookup, you'd have to start sprouting new personalities which in turn will not only fight over the physical body but the high it is experiencing, the robot that is yourself would be at the complete mercy of reckless chemical mindthwarting... Muahahaha...
 
The New Hampshire version would restrict civil liability to dealers of cocaine, cocaine derivatives, heroin and ecstasy

Uh... why only these drugs?

This whole thing is stupid. I'm tired of people who make their own CHOICES such as using drugs or eating McDonald's and becoming fat ass lard asses suing others for THEIR problems.
 
for gods sake, the dealer didnt rob you of your money then just kindly leave you drugs, its a fucking deal, he didnt shove them down your throat. We need to learn to take responsibility for our own goddamn decisiosn and stop expecting everyojne else to take the blame and fix it for us.
 
the USA is the most irresponsible country ever.......how could something like that NOT be the user's and ONLY the user's problem.......why aren't people who are old enough to make decisions, held responsible for those decisions.........i wanna start my own country where people like this are just bitch-slapped
 
Not that I support this bill, but I think you're kind of missing the point. The way I see it, this bill is to help those who havn't made a choice but have still been hurt by drugs (ie the children of drug addicts). Although I agree that the bulk of the responsibility of course lies with the drug user, the dealer is not neccessarily devoid of responsibility, and in situations where the actual user is unable to compensate the "victim" I'm not sure it's fair for their life to be completley fucked up while the dealer laughs all the way to the bank.
 
Drug dealing is inherently capitalist in nature, there are no 'victims' of the 'evil drug dealers.'
If someone has a gambling addiction or alcohol addiction, do their kids sue the casinos or beer manufacturers for lost college money? I think not.
Drugs run on supply and demand, not threats and torture of unwilling consumers by suppliers.
 
Forget injuries, I'd like to see some one buy illegal drugs, get busted and sent to jail, then sue the dealer for the value of the time they lost being able to live free (outside of prison). A month in the slammer has to be worth $5,000 or more. And, obviously, if the dealer had not sold you the drugs you would not have been busted. So it can be viewed as the dealer's fault

Obviously, there is the issue of your knowing participation and consent to the transaction, but frankly I think a good lawyer could get the jury so mad at drug dealers generally that they really don't care about that stuff. I mean, if you have the chance to financially hurt a known drug dealer, even if the money will go to a drug user, wouldn't you still do it? Well, maybe not you, but your average Joe Sixpack and Mary Housecook might.

~psychoblast~
 
Top