entheogensmurf
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 76
My apologies in that I have no researched the legally available alternatives deeply enough to hold a solid opinion, beyond that of:
1. AA is bunk and while some from the org are to me obviously caring and seek to help for worthy reasons, it does more harm than good.
2. That at the core, any system that has a person surrender to any concept of higher power in place of attempting to trust in themselves, the people capable of assisting them and "loved ones," is doomed to fail and ultimately be a source of harm or energy and will best spent on credible ventures. This is a topic I do intend on becoming obsessively entrenched in eventually for a variety of reasons.
My delving into the alternatives with the use of psychoactive substances as a tool with the treatment of abuse and addiction is quite vast, which has long since been quite clear with indication of potential and already proven effectiveness.
With just a short search, some of these ring a bell:
Top 7 Best Alcoholics Anonymous Alternatives List
http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=28817
Again, I need to do the reading to provide more opinion beyond the above.
For the very few that AA help so to speak, it is easy enough to address, however, thank goodness another far more articulate did so, providing the justice to the importance of the topic
The Effectiveness of the Twelve-Step Treatment by A. Orange
http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-effectiveness.html
The citations are available for the claims made in that article.
No, however, I will sooner than later (with 2 months).
Perhaps in the coming weeks I will start up my project to explain this as it appears to not be answered in the way I see fit and to the fruition for communities such as BL. I can see that quite a few do comprehend the core aspects already, so at least I know there are some out there already there.
One piece to this is that one need only stand back and look at AA and run a comparative analysis between it and that of the function of at least the majority if not ALL theistic religions, with special attention to the Abrahamic ones (Islam and Christianity as the final two of the three as template examples).
Book PLUG!
You can find this on various places such as Amazon and Green Wood:
There are more to read out there, though, this one provides a great starting point.
1. AA is bunk and while some from the org are to me obviously caring and seek to help for worthy reasons, it does more harm than good.
2. That at the core, any system that has a person surrender to any concept of higher power in place of attempting to trust in themselves, the people capable of assisting them and "loved ones," is doomed to fail and ultimately be a source of harm or energy and will best spent on credible ventures. This is a topic I do intend on becoming obsessively entrenched in eventually for a variety of reasons.
My delving into the alternatives with the use of psychoactive substances as a tool with the treatment of abuse and addiction is quite vast, which has long since been quite clear with indication of potential and already proven effectiveness.
Pretty interesting article. A few ppl I know are trying to get me to attend meetings with them because they work so great for them, but I dont know if I even belive in god so I cant see it helping me any. Are most group meetings all basically the same in which some sort of god or whatever is what there based around?
With just a short search, some of these ring a bell:
Top 7 Best Alcoholics Anonymous Alternatives List
http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=28817
Again, I need to do the reading to provide more opinion beyond the above.
Good article. The fact is 100's of thousands of people have completely turned their lives around and often saved their life because of AA and NA meetings. Regardless if the philosophies behind it and the "Vaguely defined higher power", it does work and help a lot of people.
I can't personally get my head round it yet and can't seem to make it work for me. I can imagine that a lot of people of this fourm are in the same boat. As, making a very big generalisation here, we want to tackle our problems our own way. I'm basing this, loosely, on the fact that by becoming a member of a forum like bluelight, one has already shown that they want to do their own research into drugs, alcohol, the effects and problems caused by them and how to get better.
I still attend meetings, with the aim to try to make them work for me, but no luck thus far.
For the very few that AA help so to speak, it is easy enough to address, however, thank goodness another far more articulate did so, providing the justice to the importance of the topic
The Effectiveness of the Twelve-Step Treatment by A. Orange
http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-effectiveness.html
Even the most ardent true believers who will be honest about it recognize that A.A. and N.A. have at least 90% failure rates. And the real numbers are more like 95% or 98% or 100% failure rates. It depends on who is doing the counting, how they are counting, and what they are counting or measuring.
A 5% success rate is nothing more than the rate of spontaneous remission in alcoholics and drug addicts. That is, out of any given group of alcoholics or drug addicts, approximately 5% per year will just wise up, and quit killing themselves. They just get sick and tired of being sick and tired, and of watching their friends die. (And something between 1% and 3% of their friends do die annually, so that is a big incentive.) They often quit with little or no official treatment or help. Some actually detox themselves on their own couches, or in their own beds, or locked in their own closets. Often, they don't go to a lot of meetings. They just quit, all on their own, or with the help of a couple of good friends who keep them locked up for a few days while they go through withdrawal. A.A. and N.A. true believers insist that addicts can't successfully quit that way, but they do, every day.
...an alcoholism treatment program that seems to have a 5% success rate probably really has a zero percent success rate — it is just taking credit for the spontaneous remission that is happening anyway. It is taking the credit for the people who were going to quit anyway. And a program that has less than a five percent success rate, like four or three, may really have a negative success rate — it is actually keeping some people from succeeding in getting clean and sober. Any success rate that is less than the usual rate of spontaneous remission indicates a program that is a real disaster and is hurting the patients.
The citations are available for the claims made in that article.
Anyone checked out S.M.A.R.T before? (Self management and recovery training). Similar type of thing, with Live online meetings, which I can imagine a lot of people on here would be interested in. Link: http://www.smartrecovery.org/
No, however, I will sooner than later (with 2 months).
The psychology behind AA is something of which that can be extracted and analyzed. I am certain, or consider it quite probable that you could both understand the concepts and with illumination apparent, become aware why it is not something you can make work work for you.I can't personally get my head round it yet and can't seem to make it work for me
Perhaps in the coming weeks I will start up my project to explain this as it appears to not be answered in the way I see fit and to the fruition for communities such as BL. I can see that quite a few do comprehend the core aspects already, so at least I know there are some out there already there.
One piece to this is that one need only stand back and look at AA and run a comparative analysis between it and that of the function of at least the majority if not ALL theistic religions, with special attention to the Abrahamic ones (Islam and Christianity as the final two of the three as template examples).
Book PLUG!
You can find this on various places such as Amazon and Green Wood:

Psychedelic Medicine [Two Volumes]: New Evidence for Hallucinogenic Substances as Treatments
Thomas B. Roberts, Michael Winkelman
There are more to read out there, though, this one provides a great starting point.
Last edited: