It was difficult to determine where to post this as its not related to recovery strategies but is related to the recovery process or industry in general.
If it needs to be moved or deleted thats ok but I hope it could be answered in some way even via PM. Perhaps it might help readers to take care to avoid unethical service providers and/or to save on the overall cost of treatment.
I would like to get some feedback on your concerns and issues with the substance abuse and recovery industry specifically where you think patients are being taken advantage of in some way, especially if their treatment quality and cost is compromised due to some other industry priority, like financial gain.
Also not necessarily any issues experienced at individual service providers or exceptions to the normal process, but rather the problems with the entire industry and accepted norms or standards for treatment.
A good example might be the homepage article today (Big Pharma Company Jacks Up Price of Overdose Life Saver by 1100%: Now, More People Will Die). The fact that this is even possible without any significant opposition or consequence is sickening because somehow we have all been tricked into thinking that large scale commercially motivated malpractice suffering and death is ok. I wish I could be trained by the marketing genius behind this if i cant find the cigarette and nicotine guy first.
To clarify further, what standard treatment and related best practices might be setup with focus on financial or commercial gains instead of whats best for the patient.
Conspiracies, with at least some logical or reasonable evidence to support it, are welcome. I dont need the facts or the confirmed truths. Any information or opinions are helpful even if only as starting point for further research and confirmation.
For example:
Are opiate maintenance drugs the best solution for the patient or are they an excellent way for big pharma to profit directly from the illegal drug trade.
Could the fact that shorter term, more effective, more economical or single dose addiction treatment options could be suppressed or be unknown to the masses to maintain profits from the illegal trade of pharma drugs or superscription of maintenance drugs.
Do treatment centers profit from maintenance drug prescriptions or is there any financial or other incentive for them to do what may not be the best solution for the patient.
I really would just like to know how and where to find more information on The Dark Side of the addiction recovery industry.
This as well as the entire drug and mental health/function topic is an interest and I am also an online marketing consultant so I would like to see if could get involved in some positive way. Use marketing for Good instead of Evil for once. Im sure its possible lol.
Its just disturbing to see the signs and indications of massive abuse and profiteering of the pain and suffering of others such as those that need genuine assistance on this topic. The really worrisome thing however is that it is mostly accepted without much opposition or outrage. Do no harm should be clarified to include "do the least amount of good for the most amount of money" as harm as well.
Anyways, thanks.
If it needs to be moved or deleted thats ok but I hope it could be answered in some way even via PM. Perhaps it might help readers to take care to avoid unethical service providers and/or to save on the overall cost of treatment.
I would like to get some feedback on your concerns and issues with the substance abuse and recovery industry specifically where you think patients are being taken advantage of in some way, especially if their treatment quality and cost is compromised due to some other industry priority, like financial gain.
Also not necessarily any issues experienced at individual service providers or exceptions to the normal process, but rather the problems with the entire industry and accepted norms or standards for treatment.
A good example might be the homepage article today (Big Pharma Company Jacks Up Price of Overdose Life Saver by 1100%: Now, More People Will Die). The fact that this is even possible without any significant opposition or consequence is sickening because somehow we have all been tricked into thinking that large scale commercially motivated malpractice suffering and death is ok. I wish I could be trained by the marketing genius behind this if i cant find the cigarette and nicotine guy first.
To clarify further, what standard treatment and related best practices might be setup with focus on financial or commercial gains instead of whats best for the patient.
Conspiracies, with at least some logical or reasonable evidence to support it, are welcome. I dont need the facts or the confirmed truths. Any information or opinions are helpful even if only as starting point for further research and confirmation.
For example:
Are opiate maintenance drugs the best solution for the patient or are they an excellent way for big pharma to profit directly from the illegal drug trade.
Could the fact that shorter term, more effective, more economical or single dose addiction treatment options could be suppressed or be unknown to the masses to maintain profits from the illegal trade of pharma drugs or superscription of maintenance drugs.
Do treatment centers profit from maintenance drug prescriptions or is there any financial or other incentive for them to do what may not be the best solution for the patient.
I really would just like to know how and where to find more information on The Dark Side of the addiction recovery industry.
This as well as the entire drug and mental health/function topic is an interest and I am also an online marketing consultant so I would like to see if could get involved in some positive way. Use marketing for Good instead of Evil for once. Im sure its possible lol.
Its just disturbing to see the signs and indications of massive abuse and profiteering of the pain and suffering of others such as those that need genuine assistance on this topic. The really worrisome thing however is that it is mostly accepted without much opposition or outrage. Do no harm should be clarified to include "do the least amount of good for the most amount of money" as harm as well.
Anyways, thanks.