• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Recomended books on Buddhism?

my worst enemy

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
79
Location
Scandinavia
I have been curious about the subject for quite some time and now I feel ready to do some reading. I have been told Buddhism is one of the best toolbox's for developing a bigger spiritual perspective.

I have been off drugs and alcohole for 10 month now and my plan is to keep it that way. And Im thinking a spiritual perspective might help me with this. Breathing more and fighting less.. with myself and the world around me.

So if you have any tips on what could be a good eye opener into the subject for someone like me, let me know.
 
This is a good question actually, some time back I came into possession of an introductory text to Buddhism that was clearly written to make the religion seem friendly to a Christian audience, and I felt misrepresented the basic tenets of the tradition (created a great ethical crisis for me when I was moving...couldn't and didn't want to keep the damn thing, donating it would only serve to misinform but destroying/trashing a book is a black/white morality issue for me. I will go so far as to call it evil. In the end I left it to someone else to decide what to do with it, don't know what they did).

My best answer is to read broadly about the tradition, and then explore translated texts for Buddhists by Buddhist authors.
 
Last edited:
Anything by Brad Warner

Three Pillars of Zen by Phillip Kapleau

Zen Mind, Beginner's mind by Shunryu Suzuki

Man I'm drawing a blank right now. I've read so many. I feel like there's a couple more I really want to mention. I've read a few by Tich Naht Hahn and think it's trash personally.
 
Honestly, anything by Brad Warner. I have read all 4 of his books, plus follow his blog regularly at hardcorezen.info
 
This is great. Thanks loads, keep it coming. Also if you can motivate why this or that book or author is recomended, please do.
 
You will need to read the Tripiṭaka, in full, in the original Pāli.
Anything else will bring you false enlightenment.
There is no alternative if you are serious about Buddhism.

I have not reached enlightenment and you too, Sir, you have not reached enlightenment. Take a look at what you're saying.

There is no such thing as "false" enlightenment. You just fall off the track every once in a while.

Good luck, OP!
 
The Dhammapada is a good way to go. It's kind of like the Buddhist version of the Bible. It's a go-to when you're looking for something.

Seconding this -- and unlike the Bible, the Dhammapada is very simple, short, and elegant. It's a collection of general thoughts about life and good living. It's a very interesting book and shouldn't cost too much. You can read it online here if you'd like.
 
I personally liked the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying by Sogyal Rinpoche.

That is false enlightenment.
Buddha wouldn't have taught anything if there were nothing to teach.
How could you possibly know that I have not reached enlightenment?
Have you even read the Tripiṭaka?

You don't need to read thousands of pages in a foreign language to understand your own heart. Besides, the basic precepts of Buddhism do not require such in depth study.

Anyone who claims they are enlightened is speaking from a place of ego and separation. Enlightenment is nonduality.
 
i thought the point of enlightenment was to just be happy and not flex nuts. if your enlightened you are, if you'r not you'r not. claim to be nothing but human
 
flex nuts, dick size, "see whos more spiritual". the goal isnt to get there and say look what i did! its just to get there for yourself.
i just think claiming enlightenment is foolish. if you truely are enlightened then you wouldnt need to ever say it.
 
I have not reached enlightenment and you too, Sir, you have not reached enlightenment. Take a look at what you're saying.

There is no such thing as "false" enlightenment. You just fall off the track every once in a while.

Good luck, OP!

Well said, Simply Live. The whole point of Buddhism is that we are supposed to question beliefs. Anyone who claims that one cannot be serious about Buddhism without reading Pali---who claims there is "no alternative" to reading Pali or that it's necessary in some way---this is so misleading that I hope it does not scare people away from the Buddhism thread.

Dear My Worst Enemy: There are lots of great books about Buddhism but I agree that the Dhammapada is a great place to start. Thich Nat Hanh is wonderful and so is Pema Chodron. Chogyam Trungpa is a wonderful buddhist author (Tibetan Buddhist.) For Zen: someone mentioned Alan Watts and I'd add Daisetz Suzuki and Katagiri Roshi. For novels that have to do with Buddhism: you might try Siddhartha by Herman Hesse, The Dharma Bums by Jack Kerouac or Franny and Zooey by J. D. Salinger, which is very entertaining and also influenced with Buddhist philosopy. Actually novels are a good place to start, they give you an idea of the field before you start reading the philosophy. There are also lots of great meditation classes and audio books on itunes: just type in Buddhist and a ton of stuff will come up. PM me if you want to talk some more, or want more targeted recommendations. Good luck!
 
That is false enlightenment.
Buddha wouldn't have taught anything if there were nothing to teach.
How could you possibly know that I have not reached enlightenment?
Have you even read the Tripiṭaka?

No, I have not read that book. How do I know you haven't reached enlightenment? You're boasting, that's how. When you're enlightened, you don't tell others you're enlightened because there is no such thing as "I" anymore.
 
So no one can ever claim to be enlightened? And if they do they show themselves to be a fraud?

Have you ever heard the saying that if you see the Buddha on the path you should destroy him? An ego claiming that it's enlightened is an oxymoron. It's like Samsara claiming that it's Nirvana. Enlightenment by its very definition is the absence of ego. There is no difference between you and the Infinite, and Enlightenment would be that realization becoming fully embodied. "I am enlightened" is that nice self-referencing "I" trying to act like it's real and it has separateness from the rest.

The simple version: people who need to convince others that they are enlightened are not, especially if they are touting that their way is the best/only way.

The goal of Buddhism is to reach enlightenment.

You can't reach something that you already are. The illusion of separation has you.

Buddhism strives for the end of karma and rebirth by working with the subtle mind to return to Emptiness, which you already are and always were.

If someone claims that enlightenment is impossible to reach, then what good are the books that they recommend?

The claim that enlightenment is something you "reach for" is problematic, as though it were a spiritual ladder. There is no spiritual ladder. There is no hierarchy, no middle man (or middle book), or awakening. Being alive is the Awakeness. There is nothing beyond now. There is no here or there. It's not a word.

Enlightenment is just a word that is a product of mind. What it actually is may be approached differently for different people. Some use no doctrine at all. My conflict with you mostly stems from the fact that you believe someone not only has to read large volumes of religious text, but also a very specific one, to figure out the "right way". If there were a formula for it then everyone would do it. Enlightenment is spontaneous and unique to each person who achieves it.
 
^ None of us have said anything negative about Buddhism. I truly enjoy the works of it. We have an anti-YOU agenda. You're the one making attacks.

I have never said enlightenment doesn't exist. No one has made that claim. I'm saying you're not enlightened, which would tell you that reading that book you keep going on about has done nothing to help you reach it. This is not to say that everyone that reads it doesn't reach enlightenment.

I just think you need something a bit more relaxed to read. Your mind it tighter than a steel ball!
 
You will need to read the Tripiṭaka, in full, in the original Pāli.
Anything else will bring you false enlightenment.
There is no alternative if you are serious about Buddhism.

^ You said the Tripitaka is the ONLY book that someone should read. That NO other books will help. If you ask me, I say you don't even have to read to reach enlightenment. It might just take a little while longer to learn everything yourself.
 
Top