• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: andyturbo

Race relations hit a new low in Sydney

Jubas I don't think you're racist. I do think you are a white middle-class man with white middle-class ideas and opinions, and you cannot understand how someone without all the advantages and perks in life you have received cannot arrive at the same conclusions.

This whole riot had little to do with the death of an aboriginal boy and even less to do with the perceived goading of police (true or not). It has had everything to do with a community of disenfranchised people who live like second class citizens standing up and shouting out in a society that has made them voiceless. The death of this boy was simply a trigger that has unleashed simmering tensions and resentment that have stretched back decades.

If you were aboriginal and brought up in the kind of environment where your life expectancy was 18 years less than the community norm Jubas, you'd probably have been out rioting too, as would I.

If you can accept that premise then you can accept that your ideas of what seem 'logical', 'rational' and 'productive' are only formulated on the basis that you (and the rest of us) have had a pampered, middle-class upbringing, with parents who weren't junkies or prostitutes because their parents weren't junkies or prostitutes. How can you possibly expect people to rationalise their actions, and pick themselves up off the ground when the reason YOU can do so is because of your stable rearing and formal education.. and yet these people probably barely know how to read?

We tend to be products of our upbringing, not masters of it. And this is why cycles of poverty and despair are so difficult to to break.

And can I say that 200 years is most certainly not a long time, esp. when you consider how socially stygmatised aboriginal people remain to this day. Get turned away from jobs and housing because of the colour of your skin, have people cross the road as they're walking towards you out of fear, and watch people clutch their handbags just that little tighter as you pass by enough times.... and well... you'd begin to feel a little angry and resentful too.

You know, some aboriginies probably do use their race as a manipulative tool to some extent, but then the amount of racism and marginalisation that they are subject to is of a far greater factor.

The whole 'just get over it' tone of the middle of your post displays a spectacular lack of regard as to the trials and difficulties indigenous Australians face simply trying to function in contemporary society, and the almost intractable problems of familial and cultural cycles of poverty and social decay. The same reason these aboriginal youths seemingly get born into lives of crime are the same reasons that you and your siblings end up with good educations and affluent careers. Because of the way you were brought up.

I too echo your comments that the police do an excellent job under trying circumstances, but I think it needs to be realised that the problems faced by Redfern and Eveleigh Street are not criminal ones, they are by far and away social and cultural. And unfortunately the police are unequipped to cure these.

I also think this whole "demolish the block' argument is a cogent example of the kind of naivety and ignorance that pervades this debate. The block is a rundown slum because of the social and cultural dysfunction that its inhabitants find themselves caught up in. Any new building or development will quickly suffer the same fate as those existing ones unless services that aim to reduce the social decay are also brought in. A couple of wrecking balls and a lick of paint is not going to cure the problem, only temporarily relieve its symptoms.

I'm not here to provide answers and Im acutely aware that all I have done is define a problem, I'm also not here to play the blame game. I merely want to point out that the causes of this violence go beyond the headlines of a little boy on his bike, and that the wider community needs to attempt to understand as best it can why this type of civil unrest occurs, rather than simply vilifying as a community those involved.

M.
 
Last edited:
Race relations hit a new CHALLENGE in Sydney


I OCEANBOY.NU OF THIS PLANET HAVE A FEW WORDS TO SAY.;

FIRST OF ALL MY HEART MIND AND SOUL LOVE DOES GO EXTREMELY AND ETERNALLY EXTERNALY TOWARDS YOU IN THE HIGHEST AND GREATEST LOVE THAT WILL PLEASE FLOW OUT OF MY BEING TO THE DIRECT FAMILY INVOLVED AND there-ALL following IN THE SPARK AND SUBFIRES OF THIS SITUATION.

The Facts Remain;;
Australian Police are people made up of people like you and me. They are of our kin. Please look for a moment that the kind way we gracefully have Aboriginal/Non Aboriginal Police Officers in Cities & Outback Australia. They do such, such, beauty and great good; please look compassionately and faithfully towards them.Would you really like to be in a land where they would not be?What kind of Australia would we really have without them?

How about this for an idea?....
What would have happened if we had had a Sikorsky Helicopter “Official “Mob/Crew” of Wise Aboriginal Policemen fly directly into Redfern to download the Aboriginal BLUELIGHTERS BLUELIGHT TEAM ONTO THE STATE OF BLESSED NEW SOUTH WALES”, in this specific Scenario?
1.Would they be recognised?
2.Could they just do a Super Chill Out?
waratah.gif


Or were there other underlying emotional feelings, situations, emotions, basic flight/fight and other issues that had not been and can be gracefully healed in some-type of Local Healing Centre?

I choose to work with the government and Police(Bluelighters ;GET IT?)Australian drug laws just need a gentle and gracef.full awakening.

This is O loving you, and I work for
Truth,
Justice
Love
Beauty,
Purity
AND I WORK FOR THE PURE BLUELIGHT
:)


ONE MAJOR CHECK, WHERE WAS THE KRANKING MOBILE SOUND SYSTEM?
 
Last edited:
Here's a charming example of your "compassionate" police:

Lateline 08/06/01
Compere: Tony Jones
Reporter: David Spicer



TONY JONES: After all the inquiries, reports and hand-wringing over the years, many people had expected, and hoped, that the bad old days of police brutality towards Aborigines were behind us.

And then along comes a piece of evidence to remind people of what can still go on behind closed doors.

Today, a NSW court was played a video showing a police officer bashing an Aboriginal man and hauling him unconscious into a cell by his hair.

The NSW Government had sought to prevent the tape's release, but after it was shown, the State's Police Commissioner ordered a review of what happened in the Armidale police station in 1997.

DAVID SPICER: This is the video the NSW Government tried to keep off tonight's TV news.

Aboriginal prisoner Vernon Moran was knocked unconscious inside the Armidale police station after being thrown into a wall.

Former senior constable Peter Connett then dragged him into a police cell by the hair.

NSW Police Commissioner Peter Ryan says it makes him sick.

PETER RYAN, NSW POLICE COMMISSIONER: I was both shocked and horrified when I saw this video and very angry indeed.

DAVID SPICER: The State Government urged a District Court judge not to release the tape today.

But Judge Robert Kelleman allowed the media into court to tape the video saying only its release could portray the viciousness and callousness of the attack.

Mr Moran this week received undisclosed compensation from the State Government.

Now it's suing the former police officer involved in the attack to recover some of the money.

Commissioner Ryan also wants to investigate why other officers did nothing.


Here is a glimpse into the realities that surround life for Aboriginal Australians.
Aboriginal australians are 27 time more likely to be incarcerated than white australians, and as of 1995, they represented nearly 32% of all those held in police custody, which is quite an anomaly when you consider that they make up only 2% of the population.

The 1998 NSW Criminal Court Statistics, recently released by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research shows a significant increase in the number of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) people charged with criminal offences. In 1997, 8,346 ATSI people were dealt with by NSW Local Courts. In 1998 this figure rose to 10,029, an increase of more than 20 per cent .

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders are much more likely to be imprisoned than non-ATSI offenders for the same kinds of offence. For example, 21.7 per cent of ATSI offenders found guilty of offences against the person were imprisoned, compared with 9.1 per cent of offenders overall found guilty of offences against the person.

And this, nearly fifteen years after the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, in one of their major findings, recommended that arrests be used only as a last resort. Things are actually going backwards... 8(
 
Due to a misjudgement on my part I edited a post I shouldn't have but luckily I saved the thread before editing - this is the back up copy but unfortunately people who posted after me are still in the thread that got swapped over.

Here they are:

Posted by Oceanboy:
You can look up anything on the net to attempt to confirm any fear.

We are loving beings there is no stopping that. Of course I am concerned as to how Bluelighters treat people. I have a theory that if only monks and priests were then made Bluelighters then we'd be fine.

The world is healing, learning, purging, getting better.

Please do not worry YOU SHALL BE FINE.

Hope

Faith.

YOU ARE DOOMED TO PERFECTION!



Much love to All that need it.


NOW WHERE WAS THE SOUND SYSTEM PLAYING THE CHILL OUT BEATS????????????????????????????????


Posted by doofqueen:
I'm with Macksta on this one...


Posted by astrosmurf:
^^ me too.

i don't think we can fully understand the plight of these people without having been in the situation ourselves. we can empathise all we like but will we ever actually know what it feels like???

"and as for aboriginees being angry because they were 'fucked up' by english settlers. whatever.
a) it was 200+ years ago, thats 3 - 4 generations"

Jubas- if someone had done the same to your ancestors and you were brought up knowing exactly what injustices they had suffered and by whose hands, i'm sure you'd be pretty pissed too, i know i sure wouldn't take it lying down


Posted by Raz:
Umm, just to clarify a point:

Aboriginal people weren't just fucked over 200+ years ago...children were taken from their families quite legally up until the 1970's. It was a common experience for kids in my neighbourhood to be beaten up by cops and aboriginal death in custody isn't an academic point to be argued, it's something that's happened to people I know.

When I was growing up in Fitzroy it was a very different place to what it is now...not all that different from Redfern really. My mum wouldn't let me out on my own a lot of the time, as much because of cops who stabbed a 12-year old boy for listening to music in a park as for any fear of the people we lived with.

I'm not trying to justify what happened in Redfern because honestly I think there's a lot we don't know and probably won't know about the circumstances of that night, so it's not my place to judge one way or the other.

All I'm saying is just be aware that issues affecting Aboriginal people are still very relevant today, and not just a part of our history that a lot of people would like to just "get over". If you don't think that Aboriginals are a marginalised part of society today, name 5 Aboriginals who've achieved public recognition in their chosen field...you could say the same for pretty much any ethnic minority.

It's very much a fat white man's world out there....


Apologies to all concerned :)
 
Bulldoze the block? nah. Fuck that. Renovate it with a crack team of aboriginal architects, landscapers and builders and turn it into a top rating reality TV show!
 
What I said on the previous page wasn't intended to discriminate againsn't Aboriginals or class them below us. I just wanted to say how radicaly we have changed their way of life and as Raz mentioned it wasn't only 200 or 300 years ago that we did this but all the way up to the present and it will happen for some time to come.

It is a fact that police see Aboriginals as trouble makers and I'm sure they target them constantly. Even if the boy wasn't chased away by police he would have felt the need to run away because of this fear.
 
What I want to know is how the hell does one impale oneself on a fence?

Perhaps they should put up signs: DANGER POINTY FENCE!





flame away
 
notneo said:

It is a fact that police see Aboriginals as trouble makers and I'm sure they target them constantly. Even if the boy wasn't chased away by police he would have felt the need to run away because of this fear.

Yup, here are some facts that would support such an idea:

  • It has been nearly fifteen years since a Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommended that Aboriginal people only be imprisoned as a last resort. it seems the report has only been given token recognition and most of its key recommendations have never been implemented.

    Aboriginal australians are 27 time more likely to be incarcerated than white australians, and as of 1995, they represented nearly 32% of all those held in police custody, keep in mind they represent 2% of the population.

    Between 1997 and 1998 there was significant increase in the number of Aboriginal people charged with criminal offences. In 1997, 8,346 Aboriginal people were dealt with by NSW Local Courts. In 1998 this figure rose to 10,029, an increase of more than 20 per cent .

    Aboriginal offenders are much more likely to be imprisoned than non-Aboriginal offenders for the same kinds of offence. For example, 21.7 per cent of Aboriginal offenders found guilty of offences against the person were imprisoned, compared with 9.1 per cent of offenders overall found guilty of offences against the person.

    The imprisonment rate of Aborinal people and the incidences of their deaths in custody is the highest in the world, higher than South Africa and the USA. If the same rates were applied to whites in prison 8,000 would have died in eight years.
 
I better get a crew of thugs and buy out the redfern blocks cheaply and re-develop it to a millionare's suburb, and make few easy bucks for my crew of thugs =D

Or sell my cheaply brought blocks and sell it to TV channel for The next Reailty TV shows.
 
wow,
there's been a lot constructive posts in here, with little actual personal flaming. i'm impressed :). i've got a few more points i'd like to make to a few of the other responses.

macksta: great post.. and i don't really have any reply to it. i am responding from the white middle class scenario, with greater wealth, health and education. theses scenarios do tend to repeat themselves, and if i'm not mistaken, there have been riots in redfern before. but is redfern the only concentration of aboriginees in australia? (not rhetorical :P ). i'm sure there are concentrations down in melbourne and most definitely in some of the other cities. i can't remember the last time that any of them riotted, or became as famous as redfern. Yet, they live in what i assume (and quite potentially incorrectly) to be, the same conditions. same race, same income, same apparent racism disability. But none have the reputation of redfern..

killarava: (re the news clippings). clipping one:
this is the type of thing that frustrates me. A prison officer bashing an aboriginal man. Now, look at the motivations of the media in publishing this article, and for those who tried to get the tape released. I am certain that in some jail in some city, a white man has been bashed, rendered unconcious, and dragged into his cell. Why isn't it common knowledge? because the media don't find it sensationalist enough. Should the prison officer who say does it to both white and aboriginal inmates be punished? perhaps. But should he be punished only because he did it to an aboriginal? What i see to be the facts in this situation, is that in true media manner, a tension is being exploited. The racial situation is being sensationalised, and in almost all cases, being used against the police force (and associated subsidiaries) who try to protect (in general) the people in this city.

re news clipping 2:
(sorry for dragging this one, but the items came to mind as reading).
Aboriginal australians are 27 time more likely to be incarcerated than white australians
This is a misleading statement. and a highly inflammatory one if i'm correct. does this figure state that police are watching for aboriginal crime 27 times more than non-aboriginal? (which seems to be implied by aboriginal leaders). or is it simply, that more aboriginees are arrested per sample than white people (by 27 times). i think that it refers to the latter comment. the wording of the article has the potential to implicitly suggest that police are targetting aboriginal people 27 times more than white people. Is this the case? i find it hard to believe.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders are much more likely to be imprisoned than non-ATSI offenders for the same kinds of offence. For example, 21.7 per cent of ATSI offenders found guilty of offences against the person were imprisoned, compared with 9.1 per cent of offenders overall found guilty of offences against the person.
might i point out that correlation does NOT imply causation!
this to me definitely seems to be a situation of social inequity. I think what the judge has to consider here (or whoever does the judgement) is the chance of reoffending. with the social inequities, aboriginals are more likely to commit crimes again, and hence should be imprisonned to stop that.

recommended that arrests be used only as a last resort.
arrests be only used as a last resort?
what kind of recomended action is that?! 'let them break the law, but only arrest them if you have to'.
if someone would like to further explain this to me, feel free.

astrosmurfif someone had done the same to your ancestors and you were brought up knowing exactly what injustices they had suffered and by whose hands, i'm sure you'd be pretty pissed too, i know i sure wouldn't take it lying down

my family heritage is Polish. Through its history poland has been annexed 3 times. my extended family have suffered countless hardships. concentration camps, gas chambers, persecution, murder, assault, social inequity and the likes. I am shocked that my family had to go through it, and it makes me angry, i'll admit. but i've forgiven the people who did it to my family. i'm a lucky person, and my father was able to 'make it' good. As some of you might not have guessed (macksta :P ), i'm the only generation in my family who has been 'middle class'. My father was lower class, and my family before him was even less at times. My grandmother has forgiven the germans, and as far as i'm aware, there was no great resentment further up my family lineage.

my point?
did the polish people hate their occupiers? of course. did they use their race as a tool? no. i'll be the first to admit, that situations are quite different, and i use the above family history only to compare my feelings against the past persecution of my family, vs aboriginals feeling hard done by today, as suggested by astrosmurf. please don't take the above as a comparison to today's events as its quite obviously not the same.

my whole point?!
(about bloody time hey?).

There do exist social inequities between aboriginal and non-aboriginal people in australia. What i dislike, nay, hate, is the fact that if an aboriginal and a white man are done an apparent injustice by police, then the aboriginal case is sensationalized and the police called down. while if it occurs to a white person, little is said. people riotting then saying they're being persecuted for the reprisals disgust me. people making constant excuses for aboriginals also get on my nerves occasionally. Lets not make excuses for them, lets do something about it.
bulldoze the block, but rebuild it with the help of the community... let aboriginal labourers do the work.. whatever. don't persecute the police for doing their job!
 
and a quick side point.
there was an apparent witness on channel 7 news at 4:30 this arvo stating with no equivocation that police were not pursuing the 17yr old when he impaled himself.
yet the mother was so certain!
he should have run away from police if he saw them! he's got a bloody warrant out on him!
are the aboriginals who were so sure that police were chasing him now going to do a backflip? or are they going to push the focus onto another aboriginal inequity?

stay tuned for the ensuing week to see!
same bat city, same bat suburb!
 
nezo said:
Bulldoze the block? nah. Fuck that. Renovate it with a crack team of aboriginal architects, landscapers and builders and turn it into a top rating reality TV show!

ok the topic is not a laughing matter but that was hell fucking funny bwahahaha (just in light of all the reality tv shows that are out there now not for the disadvantaged indiginous people)
 
arrests be only used as a last resort?
what kind of recomended action is that?! 'let them break the law, but only arrest them if you have to'.
if someone would like to further explain this to me, feel free.

I realise my respones to this have been less than cogent, I put it down to the state of my poor drug addled brain. But this issue is at the crux of everything that has been brought up here, and unless it can be understood then I am afraid you will never understand the enormity of the problems faced by the Aboriginal community

ROYAL COMMISSION INTO ABORIGINAL DEATHS IN CUSTODY

NATIONAL REPORT VOLUME 1 - THE OVER-ALL FINDINGS
1.2.1 The investigation into the deaths was extremely thorough. No effort was spared to get to the truth. All contemporary documents were subpoenaed and studied. Relevant people were interviewed wherever possible and in the great majority of instances this, was possible. In many cases postmortem reports were reconsidered by eminent pathologists. Not only the cause of death, but all aspects of custodial care and the orders binding on custodians were critically examined. Hearings were held in public; families of the deceased were represented by legal counsel. All documents were made available to counsel. Reports on the ninety-nine deaths have been delivered to government. At the time of writing almost all have been tabled in parliament and thus made public.
1.2.2 The conclusions reached in this report will not accord with the expectations of those who anticipated that findings of foul play would be inevitable and frequent. That is not the conclusion which Commissioners reached. As reported in the individual case reports which have been released, Commissioners did not find that the deaths were the product of deliberate violence or brutality by police or prison officers.

1.2.3 But Commissioners did find that, generally, there appeared to be little appreciation of and less dedication to the duty of care owed by custodial authorities and their officers to persons in custody. We found many system defects in relation to care, many failures to exercise proper care and in general a poor standard of care. In some cases the defects and failures were causally related to the deaths, in some cases they were not and in others it was open to debate. The reports of the inquiries into the deaths stand as the findings of the Commissioners. Commissioners O'Dea, Wootten and Wyvill made their findings pursuant to their own individual Letters Patent. But it can certainly be said that in many cases death was contributed to by system failures or absence of due care.

1.2.4 Deaths in custody are particularly distressing for families and friends, and engender suspicion and doubt in their minds and also in the minds of members of the public. The deceased person has been in the custody and care of the State, not accessible in the general sense, his or her life controlled and ordered by functionaries of the State, out of sight and of normal contact. Deaths in such circumstances breeds anguish and suspicion equally. Time may heal some of the anguish, but the suspicion can be allayed only by the most open and thorough going laying of the facts on the table.

1.2.5 It is not surprising that there was much cynicism about official explanations for the deaths. It is quite clear that this Royal Commission would not have been necessary or at least its Terms of Reference would have been very different--had there been adequate, objective and independent investigations conducted into each of the deaths after they occurred and had those investigations examined not only the cause of death--in the medical sense--and whether there had been foul play but also questions of custodial care and the issue of responsibility in the wider sense.

1.2.6 In very few cases prior to the establishment of the Commission was the investigation into the death other than perfunctory and from a narrow focus and the coronial inquest mirrored the faults in the investigations.

1.2.7 I deal with these questions in Chapter 4 but it is plain that much harm was done to relations between Aboriginal people and the broader community, and great hardship was imposed on the relatives of the deceased persons as a result of the inadequacies of most post-death investigations. It must never again be the case that a death in custody, of Aboriginal or non-Aboriginal persons, will not lead to rigourous and accountable investigations and a comprehensive coronial inquiry.

NATIONAL REPORT VOLUME 1 - 1.6 REDUCING THE NUMBER OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLE IN CUSTODY--THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
1.6.1 There are, in the view of all Commissioners, two levels at which the problem of the disproportionate numbers of Aboriginal people in the criminal justice system and in custody can be tackled. The first, and in some ways the most immediate and in many ways least difficult, is at the level of the criminal justice system itself. The second is at the level of those more fundamental factors which bring Aboriginal people into contact with the criminal justice system. This section deals with issues of the criminal justice system.
1.6.2 In a sense it begins before the criminal justice system takes effect. By far the largest number of Aboriginal people in police lockups, are those who are detained for what is often called protective custody, that is those who are found drunk in a public place--which in most jurisdictions is no longer a criminal offence--but who are detained and taken to police cells and kept there for a number of hours until they are thought to be sufficiently sober to be released. And these numbers are added to by those who are arrested for the offence of public drunkenness where drunkenness has not been decriminalised. The Interim Report of the Royal Commission strongly advocated sobering-up shelters, not associated with police or other custodial agencies, to which a person drunk in public could be taken. There have been some such shelters created and others are being created. Many more are needed.

1.6.3 There are also large numbers of Aboriginal people in custody, mainly police custody and occasionally prison custody for sweet offences and, comparatively speaking, a small number in prison custody for serious offences.

1.6.4 There is much potential for diverting Aboriginal--and other-people from custody. The report contains many recommendations for doing so.

NATIONAL REPORT VOLUME 1 - DIVERSION FROM CUSTODY
1.6.5 One can start at the level of law reform and cover every facet of the system. The first group of diversion schemes are those which occur before a defendant gets before the court and concerns the interaction with police, the arrest or charge on summons, the questions of bail. Very important to all these matters is the relationship between police and Aboriginal people. Where there is less tension and less bitterness, what might be an arrest or a charge might become a caution. What might be and arrest becomes a summons to attend a court. What might be a summons to attend court does not become an arrest because matters such as indecent language or resisting enter into the course of the dealing. One of the most heartening things in this report is the improvements that are taking place in many parts of Australia in police and Aboriginal relationships.
1.6.6 Equally important are diversionary schemes by which a court sentencing a defendant found guilty can direct him or her away from the prison system as opposed to into it. Here again there is a proliferation of creative ideas and of innovative schemes which provide courts with some further and better sentencing options. There also appears to be, generally speaking, a greater willingness on the part of courts to take advantage of these options.

1.6.7 First amongst them, of very great importance, is the community service order. The Northern Territory Department of Correctional Services has been outstandingly innovative in this area. But I think that it can be said that every single jurisdiction in Australia has achievements in this area and that there are Aboriginal people--and I believe non-Aboriginal people too--who are being ordered into these diversionary schemes who not long ago would have been ordered into prison.

1.6.8 The next group are those who, having been sentenced by thecourt to a non-custodial sentence, have breached the order. Until very recently, a considerable proportion of those persons who were in prison custody were serving court sentences for non-payment of fines. This applied to Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal people alike. Some information about numbers is given in the report. Increasingly there are coming into operation diversionary schemes in respect of breaches of non-custodial orders, not only for non-payment of fines but for other breaches. There is great scope for keeping people out of prison because they cannot pay a fine. Some of those who died in custody were, in fact, in that situation.

1.6.9 Another area of importance in the sentencing process, as far as Aboriginal defendants are concerned, is input from Aboriginal communities, and particularly discrete communities, as to their views on penalty and the role that they may play in supervising non-custodial options.

1.6.10 And finally, at the sentencing end of the process there are community custody options, parole etc. All these matters are discussed at length in the report. New experiments are being tried. It is important that the process of creating new options goes on to meet different and particular circumstance. It is not necessary for me to discuss these matters further in this overview. But I must stress that, as the subsequent chapters show, in respect of Aboriginal defendants, success or otherwise of these schemes depends to a very large extent--and often wholly--upon the involvement of Aboriginal people, organisations and communities. The success of the schemes is very much connected with the empowerment of Aboriginal people, a theme to which I return.
 
in relation to 'diversion from custody', the article suggests giving less stringent policing to aboriginals. give them less consequences for their crime.

Very important to all these matters is the relationship between police and Aboriginal people. Where there is less tension and less bitterness, what might be an arrest or a charge might become a caution.

unless i'm missing the point here, it suggests leniancy for aboriginals because they are aboriginals.
this is what annoys me. the law should be blind. if you break the law, black or white, you should be punished accordingly. how long before anohther minority group starts calling the police persecutors? its a slippery slope, and i think one that has to be levelled now.
 
^^ They are promoting leniency for aboriginal people because of the death rates, where an unacceptable number of them were dying (and still are, in greater numbers, because the key findings of the report were never implemented or taken seriously. In the meantime the Howard government, armed with the policies of One Nation, has created an environment where vilification of attempts to institute change has become the norm.) at a rate that is entirely unacceptable. For a large percentage of those imprisoned (for relatively minor offences that non-aboriginal people tended to not be imprisoned for) police custody was a death sentence. The slippery-slope arguement just isn't relevant or likely in this case, this is such a distinctive and individual problem that it is not going to be equalled anytime in the next two-hundred years at least.

As Macksta pointed out, the problems faced by the Aboriginal community are of such an enormity that they go far beyond mere criminality, these are deeply ingrained socio-economic issues, and history has shown that to treat them as we do is destined for tragic mishaps. The judiciary has failed Aboriginal people and it is costing lives in a community that has already been decimated to the point of near extinction, if we want to see them function to our standards in this society then further decimation of their population isn't going to help.

I wish i could articulate myself better, but this is such a complex issue that encompasses so many different elements that I find it hard to form a proper arguement, that and the drug bender I have been on. But it angers and saddens me to see relatively affluent and privelaged white Australians blame the victims for the predicaments that our society has imposed on them. In todays political environment it is somewhat trendy to talk of the "guilt industry" surrounding Aboriginal affairs, but it seems to me the only people feeling guilty are the ones who vilify Aboriginals and try to push the problem out of view, who then further vilify them by blaming them for the guilt they feel. It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic :(
 
the law should be blind.

But it's not, discretionary powers are granted all the time under criminal law, police, magistrates, commissioners are all given some level of discretion. That is why concepts such as zero-tolerance in law are so damaging, it removes the whole idea of a case-by-case decision. No two crimes are ever exactly the same, nor should they be treated as such. In this, the most desperate of situations, it is more important than ever to exercise a healthy level of discretion.
 
killarava2day said:
But it angers and saddens me to see relatively affluent and privelaged white Australians blame the victims for the predicaments that our society has imposed on them. In todays political environment it is somewhat trendy to talk of the "guilt industry" surrounding Aboriginal affairs, but it seems to me the only people feeling guilty are the ones who vilify Aboriginals and try to push the problem out of view, who then further vilify them by blaming them for the guilt they feel. It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic :(

see, this is my problem. i agree that aboriginals have suffered in the past, and continue to do so now through social inequalities. But, from what i have seen (generally what the media reports), there has been little to no effort made by the majority of aboriginals in areas like redfern to help themselves. this is a great generalisation and i'm sure quite possibly wrong (how do you judge such things?) but coming from a relatively affluent white person's situation, i have heard little to no effort being made. what i do see, is aboriginal people committing larger numbers of crime, primarily against non-aboriginals including things such as public train stations, police and the general public. i then see any retalliatory discipline (ie police) being called racist and persecution(ist?). How then am i able to say "ok, they've suffered in the past, but lets ignore their misdemeanours, their riots and their apparent lack of regard for the society that has apparently forsaken them. While, the government pumps money into rebuilding the block (apx $4-6 million from yesterdays SMH (pg 7 i think?)), and a number of other aboriginee rehabilitation/education schemes. I think our government is trying to correct past problems but it has to be a two way street. Granted, there are a number of aboriginal leaders who try and make headway for their people, but in my experiences, the majority don't want to make headway as much. Instead, they lie about police causing deaths in their neighbourhood, trying to instigate racial tension. They insult police officers and commit crime against the hard working tax payers in this country. The same tax payers who are paying the millions of dollars into their rehabilitation and re-education. I think that once you appreciate this point, you begin to understand the attitudes that are starting to come to the fore of 'get over it' and other racial resentment. We can't go back and change whats happened in the past. whats done is done. And while there is such a raucos(sp?) over aboriginal deaths in custody, i would be highly interested to see the number of deaths in custody of non-aboriginals. The reason why aboriginal deaths in custody is such a big issue is because the media promotes the racial tension it creates. A white person being killed in custody is nowhere near as sensationalist as an aboriginal being killed in custody.
As for a jail sentance being a death sentance, i'd also be interested to see the numbers of inmates (aboriginal) vs the number of deaths. If it were seen as a death sentance, we'd be looking in the 80% region of the deaths of inmates in prison. I find this figure hard to believe in our current system. Sure, perhaps earlier in our history, but not now. I resent the racial tension that is brought to the fore of our society anytime something bad happens to an aboriginal. Look at some of the immigrants that have moved to this country (legal - the other is a different issue :P ), they've suffered hardships back home and yet still manage to survive, and to an extent contribute to our society.

as you said, the problems faced by aboriginals are enormous, but from a relatively well to do white person, paying indirectly for their support, their attitude quite frankly shocks me. a blatant disregard for the law lends little to sympathy. lying about police chasing a boy leading to his death in order to strain racial tensions just makes me angry. the racial connection is already tenuous enough as it is. A boy died, and yes he had a warrant, and it was under tragic circumstances. The truth is that there was no one to blame, it was a freak accident. Instead, the aboriginals involved in the riot have struck out against the people who try to help them.

If you ask the average person on the street whether they feel guilt for the aboriginal's current situation, i'm sure the majority will say they feel none. sure, they may sympathize with them, but most people have had no impact.. a large number of people didn't descend from those who did the initial damage to the aboriginals, and in most situations, i'm also sure that people don't feel responsible for their governments actions. Any feelings of guilt i believe would have been eroded by the last week's actions.

good post btw, in your drug addled state ;P
 
they're not the only people who have been invaded


given your understanding that this land was stolen from the indiginous population of this country then you should easily conceed to return it to them, but you dont do you.... why not?
 
Excuse my one-liners but I don't have much time...

Jubas said:
see, this is my problem. i agree that aboriginals have suffered in the past, and continue to do so now through social inequalities. But, from what i have seen (generally what the media reports), there has been little to no effort made by the majority of aboriginals in areas like redfern to help themselves.


Actually, I was under the impression it was a minority. Redfern has always been a vibrant and politically active community, as far as I can gather the real problems arise from the transients. During the 70's it underwent somewhat of a renaissance and was at the forefront of the Aboriginal rights campaign, some of the luminaries of the Aboriginal comunity cut their teeth in Redfern.

this is a great generalisation and i'm sure quite possibly wrong (how do you judge such things?) but coming from a relatively affluent white person's situation, i have heard little to no effort being made. what i do see, is aboriginal people committing larger numbers of crime, primarily against non-aboriginals including things such as public train stations, police and the general public. i then see any retalliatory discipline (ie police) being called racist and persecution(ist?).

Maybe you need to watch less sensationalist media. People who live in such tough socio-economic circumstances do tend to have higher crime rates, after all how are we to expect Aboriginal people to respect a system that has so comprehensively failed them in so many areas? Remember, so many of the things you take for granted about this "great" country of ours (ie. basic healthcare, education and legal rights) have been systematically denied to them, a situation which continues to this day.

How then am i able to say "ok, they've suffered in the past, but lets ignore their misdemeanours, their riots and their apparent lack of regard for the society that has apparently forsaken them.

GIve me more time, I will post some statistics regarding the disadvantages faced by Aboriginal people in all facets of life. It ireally isn't a case of them "suffering in the past", that is a fallacy which seeks to deny the fact that Australia is one of the only developed countries in the world that allows people to live in such abject poverty. They are suffering in the here-and-now.

While, the government pumps money into rebuilding the block (apx $4-6 million from yesterdays SMH (pg 7 i think?)), and a number of other aboriginee rehabilitation/education schemes.

One of the first things Howard did upon being elected was slash over $400 million from the Aboriginal affairs budget.


I think our government is trying to correct past problems but it has to be a two way street.

The second thing he did was legislate to overturn the High Court decision which anulled the concept of Terra Nullius (that Australia was unoccupied at the time of British settlement, hence denigrating Aboriginal people to fauna in the eyes of the colonists.) from Common Law. Arguably, one of the biggest single acts of dispossesion inflicted upon Aboriginal people in over a lifetime.

Granted, there are a number of aboriginal leaders who try and make headway for their people, but in my experiences, the majority don't want to make headway as much.

Pray do tell, just what "experience" have you had with Aboriginal people? It's pretty hard to make "headway" when your seeing your people die at ages well below the national average, and of diseases that have been all irradicated in white communities.

Instead, they lie about police causing deaths in their neighbourhood, trying to instigate racial tension.

I'm not even going to get into this one, except to say that the NSW police force has been, on more than one occassion, exposed as fostering endemic racism.

They insult police officers and commit crime against the hard working tax payers in this country. The same tax payers who are paying the millions of dollars into their rehabilitation and re-education.

Personally, i find it much more galling to know that many, many times this ammount was poured into murdering tens-of-thousands of Iraqi's, for reasons which didn't exist. As a tax payer I am much more comfortable having my tax spent on building housing for disadvantaged people than it being spent on raining fire and terror from 10,000ft on a bunch of harmless people half a world away.

I think that once you appreciate this point, you begin to understand the attitudes that are starting to come to the fore of 'get over it' and other racial resentment.

You're right, I am now certain that it is based on fear and ignorance of the facts, because it sure as shit aint based on any kind of logic I can see.

We can't go back and change whats happened in the past. whats done is done.

True, but we can change what is happening right now because the suffring isn't a thing of the past, it is still happening. And believe you me, history will not judge us well over this my friend.



And while there is such a raucos(sp?) over aboriginal deaths in custody, i would be highly interested to see the number of deaths in custody of non-aboriginals. The reason why aboriginal deaths in custody is such a big issue is because the media promotes the racial tension it creates. A white person being killed in custody is nowhere near as sensationalist as an aboriginal being killed in custody.
As for a jail sentance being a death sentance, i'd also be interested to see the numbers of inmates (aboriginal) vs the number of deaths. If it were seen as a death sentance, we'd be looking in the 80% region of the deaths of inmates in prison.

Again, you didn't even bother to read that report I linked to, did you? I kinda suspect that you aren't all that interested in finding out the truth, instead I think you would prefer to believe what you want to so you can maintain some illusion of moral superiority over Aboriginal people, otherwise you would have sought out the facts for yourself. There are literally tens-of-pages of hits when you type "Royal Commission into Deaths in Custody" into Google.

But since that seems a bit much for you I'll save you the time:

*EDIT*
Hmmm, the img didn't work, just click the link instead

http://www.atsic.gov.au/issues/law_and_justice/rciadic/indigenous_deaths_custody/chap3.asp

Note that while there were more white deaths in custody per se the statistical evidence shows that the impact such deaths had on their immediate communities is much more devestating, especially considering the level of decimation suffered by them during the Stolen generation years. If white prisoners were dying at a comprable rate you would be looking at 8,000 deaths a year, a number that would have far greater impact on our communities.

I find this figure hard to believe in our current system. Sure, perhaps earlier in our history, but not now.

Perhaps calling it a guaranteed death sentence was a touch hyperbolic, but this idea that you have that it "all happened in the past" is such a fallacy and speaks volumes about how little you understand about this issue.

I resent the racial tension that is brought to the fore of our society anytime something bad happens to an aboriginal.

You resent it?!? Ha! Try being the Aboriginal who's having the bad things happen to them! believe you me, their resentment runs much fucking deeper than your moral righteousness.

Look at some of the immigrants that have moved to this country (legal - the other is a different issue :P ), they've suffered hardships back home and yet still manage to survive, and to an extent contribute to our society.

I don't think you can compare the experience of immigrants with a race of people who have had to readjust from living in a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural/industrialised society in a phenomonally short period of two-hundred years.

as you said, the problems faced by aboriginals are enormous, but from a relatively well to do white person, paying indirectly for their support, their attitude quite frankly shocks me.

It usually is shocking when that much pent up frustration and anger explodes, but excuse me if I don't cry-you-a-river at the fact that you had to e subjected to a glimpse of what life is like for a seriously disadvantaged minority in this country. Maybe if people see more of this they won't be able to maintain this fallacy that "it's all in the past" and everything would be all peachy if it weren't for those damned ingrateful coons would just bugger of to the fringes of sociey where no one had to suffer the discomfort of actually seeing them and the way we have forced them to live.

a blatant disregard for the law lends little to sympathy.

A blatant disregard for human rights lends little to respect, would you respect an institution that had (according to the inquiries into police conduct in NSW) a culture of "endemic" racism?

lying about police chasing a boy leading to his death in order to strain racial tensions just makes me angry. the racial connection is already tenuous enough as it is. A boy died, and yes he had a warrant, and it was under tragic circumstances. The truth is that there was no one to blame, it was a freak accident.

I agree with you, a shitty situation all 'round, but i will reserve my judgement on what actually occurred until an inquiry is launched.

Instead, the aboriginals involved in the riot have struck out against the people who try to help them.

Do some homework into Aboriginal/police relations in Sydney, "help" is the last thing most Aboriginal youths can expect to receive from their friendly constabulary.

If you ask the average person on the street whether they feel guilt for the aboriginal's current situation, i'm sure the majority will say they feel none. sure, they may sympathize with them, but most people have had no impact..

Why the need to push them so far out of view then? Call me a pop-psychologist if you will but to me that just screams guilt.

a large number of people didn't descend from those who did the initial damage to the aboriginals, and in most situations, i'm also sure that people don't feel responsible for their governments actions. Any feelings of guilt i believe would have been eroded by the last week's actions.

Yes, but we all profit still to this day from the misery brought pon Aboriginal people by the Australian government, so regardless we ALL take some responsibility for it. If it wasn't for their blood, and their loss, you would probably still be a peasnt tilling the fields in Poland. Instead you enjoy a comfortable middle-class life while the Aboriginal people are still forced to live as second class citizens.
 
Last edited:
Top