That is my guess too, thanks for the link.we have more data on methadone in pregnancy than buprenorphine
That is my guess too, thanks for the link.we have more data on methadone in pregnancy than buprenorphine
That is my guess too, thanks for the link.
Everyone is talking about risks to the baby from WDing while pregnant, im wondering if the risks are just misscarrige or if there are other risks like birth defects and such. I know this is going to sound extremely awful and cold, but i feel like id rather risk loosing the pregancy while till in the very eairly non viable out side of the body stages than risk habing baby born dependant on this awful stuff.
Can Subutex harm your baby?
Currently, Subutex is in the middle, in the “C” category for use during pregnancy. Like with the other drugs in the “C” category, it is unknown whether buprenorphine can severely harm an unborn baby as there are no well-controlled studies in humans that prove the risks of taking Subutex while pregnant.
I believe the baby stayed in the hospital a bit longer then usual but I don't think he went thru the whole process of when a baby is born fully addicted. definetly switch to Subutex which I see you already did. Now you can either taper off if youd like or stay on the whole time. just don't cold turkey that's the worst thing you can do.
Thank you guys, ive taken about 25% of my normal dailey dose today and am alright! Nit fantastic but am able to go shopping and play activly with my toddler. I thinka slow taper from here is very doable and hopefully my ob understands and can help ( f not ill find one who does) hopefully my husband will be able to see past his initial shock and anger and understand i really mean the best i can for our family. Thank you all again soo much for such support. ?
Definitely, that's partly what we are here for, just let us know if there is anything we can help you with.If its ok with MODs i can kinda journal my tapers and doses on this thread and update with info from my doctors.
Yeah I was going to mention something about this but I got kinda distracted. As I seem to recall naloxone is a bit more unknown regarding pregnancy safety than buprenorphine. They might both be fine but if you can use buprenorphine alone without naloxone that would be safer.
Also I agree big time. It's the withdrawal more than anything that poses the danger here. While it would be safest not to try and taper off at all, if you must taper off, if you do it very slowly over the next several months it will probably be OK.
I really recommend that if you're going to taper off, that you do it as slowly as possible over the next few months. If you feel like you're in serious withdrawal, I beg you not to risk you and your babies health and take a bit more subutex until you feel a bit better. So long as you don't go into bad withdrawal you and your baby will probably be OK.
I'm sure this must be stressful for you, so if anything ive said has added to your worries at all I want you to know I'm sorry for that. I'm just concerned for you.![]()
MotherJ -
I agree with what Jess said entirely. You need to take your concerns to a doctor and go over them in detail - it’s scarier not knowing the answers to these questions than it is being educated on this by a health care professional.
You have time to tell your husband. Do go to the doctors appointment yourself, if you can. You will need some private time with your doctor. You won’t be able to properly plan or assess your options until you have proper answers to some of these questions.
With regard to birth defects, there is very, very little medical evidence that I could find that would support there being a correlation between the two (opiate use while pregnant and birth defects). But again, ASK YOUR DOCTOR. We could tell you all day that it’ll be fine but we aren’t doctors, we are just here to support you and help you the best we can.
One more thought - you seem to be very concerned to have family question why your baby may need to stay in the hospital after birth for longer than expected. I would really encourage you to see a therapist or councilor and talk about your family dynamics and this issue.
It may be possible that you will be forced to answer these questions because it is better for your baby. Please don’t feel that you have to rush getting off subs because of your family’s disapproval. That is their problem, not yours and certainly not the baby’s. I know that there is a lot of shame around addiction. You should find a professional to help you work through this. Time is on your side, in a lot of ways - but in a lot of other ways you kinda gotta get on it. I know it’s all overwhelming and scary, but you have the best motivation imaginable.
We are here to help and support you. The MODS don’t mind at all if you use your thread as a sort of tapering and support journal. That’s what we are here for.
- VE
Definitely, that's partly what we are here for, just let us know if there is anything we can help you with.
I think you should be a little more cautious when making statements like this, as the literature seems to contradict your statements. Birth defects and miscarriage are both potential concerns, as well as neonatal abstinence syndrome. This is what the literature that I have found says, if you have contradicting literature I would like to see it. It's a complex issue, and due to the impact it can have on peoples' lives, it is difficult to study as well.I'm gonna cut you some slack cause Im sure this must be a very emotionally charged time right now.
OK so no, the risk isn't birth defects its miscarriage. But I really think you are greatly overestimating the implications of the baby being born opioid dependent.
Read the conclusion of the link I provided. I updated the post as well to include the quote that states the risks. As to why there may not be clear definitive studies, if you read the next paragraph in the conclusion of the study I posted you will understand why:I don't believe I am contradicting the literature. I've seen no evidence of any risk of birth defects resulting from opioid use or discontinuation. I've also seen little evidence of a direct risk of miscarriage related to stable opioid use in pregnancy. But it's widely recognized that opioid withdrawal carries a risk of miscarriage. There is neonatal abstinence syndrome yes, but it's treatable and much less dangerous than the risk of miscarriage from withdrawal.
I checked your link but was unable to find direct data of birth defects relating to opioid use in pregnancy. Given how many pregnancies have involved exposure to opioids, if there were such risks I would think they'd be much more well known.
If you have data suggesting opioid substitution therapy in pregnancy carries risk of birth defects or miscarriages then I'd be happy to read it. But currently I'm not aware of any.
Read the conclusion of the link I provided. I updated the post as well to include the quote that states the risks. As to why there may not be clear definitive studies, if you read the next paragraph in the conclusion of the study I posted you will understand why:
"Studying opioid use in pregnancy presents multiple methodological challenges. Studies are vulnerable to confounding by indication, as women who take opioids—or who take a particular opioid versus another—may be different from women who do not. Additionally, it can be difficult to differentiate whether the underlying condition for opioid use (e.g., migraine) or the medication itself is responsible for any observed elevated risk. Future studies should consider the nature and severity of the underlying condition and address the potential for confounding by indication. Due to small numbers, studies often consider opioid medications as a homogeneous group and by doing so any effect for specific medications may be missed. As it is unlikely that all medications within the class of opioid medications have the same mechanism of action on the fetus, we recommend future studies assess individual opioid medications. Larger studies are needed, especially to allow for assessment of individual opioids. Furthermore, studies should focus on precise exposure measurements, with dose and duration information and accurate outcome ascertainment."
Further more, a lack of evidence does not support or favor any claim, for or against. The one making the claim is the one responsible for providing the evidence, which I feel that I did. There is inconclusive evidence showing there is risk of complications and defects, suggesting that caution should be taken and more studies should be done. I have yet to see any evidence in support of your claim, that the only risk is NAS or miscarriage.
This is false. As stated, a lack of evidence can not support anything, beyond not knowing, that is. The burden of evidence remains on whomever is making the claim, even if that claim is that there is no evidence. So in this instance, if someone is making a claim that there is no evidence showing that using opioids while pregnant will lead to birth defects, the evidence required would be studies showing no variations beyond the average in children of the mothers who used during pregnancy. Or, more realistically, at what levels can what opioids be used without a noticeable or significant increase in risk.A lack of evidence does support a claim when that lack of evidence is in spite of repeated study which should have produced evidence were the problem real.
This is itself a negative, so if it were true, you wouldn't be able to prove it. Ignoring that, it's demonstrably false. For instance, if I were to claim that there is no water in the bucket, there are a number of ways we can verify this. We can physically look to see if there is water, we can feel with our hands, we can listen for water, we can use tools like scales to weigh the bucket and calculations to figure if there is enough weight to account for water or not. (more on that here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proving_a_negative)You can't prove a negative.
I know tapering isn't ideal but in the last 15 years ive bin on this site(I had a different user name before) this situation/topic has come up multiple times. Most of the women switched to Subutex and even methadone and I don't believe any of the women had an issue when the baby was born. There has also bin ones with the woman getting freaked out by the pregnancy and decided to taper and again both way worked . So don't stress do what is comfortable for you and in return it will be more comfortable for the baby. Keep your spirits up!
Point is they don't know it can go either way. like I just stated luckily all the threads thru the years no matter which choice they made the baby was fine .