good idea, make a healthy salad and then heap two types of dead animal and a bunch of greasy cheese on top of it.
in all truth, microwaved vegetables would be better in many ways than bbq chicken - a microwave is a perfectly legitimate way to steam/ cook peas, asparagus, soften potatoes, etc... and since it works by cooking the food with heat generated by its own moisture content, there is no water or steam for the nutrients to disperse into.
Saying " heap dead animals" is trying to imply that it's bad or there are no health benefits or good reasons to consume such a meat, which is wholly untrue. Turkey for example is one of the healthiest foods around. Chicken contains precursor tryptophan, which the body uses to make 5HTP and converts to Serotonin in the liver, for example amongst many other vitamins and minerals.
Cheese is also incredibly healthy, filled with fats and protein and calcium, amongst other things. You cannae say "greasy" in front of something to make it seem bad for you! You can make anything sound unhealthy, like I had "greasy fried eggs" earlier! The "grease" was from incredibly healthy olive oil and the fried eggs were simply 3 eggs beaten together with red and green peppers (omelette), which is a very healthy foodstuff indeed!
Granted, I don't know what jarlsburg cheese is, it could be disgusting and fake shenanigans, but some meats and cheese in moderation are beneficial to one's diet.
And no, heating food with magnetrons and using microwaves are not better than consuming chicken breast. There's a load of debate on microwaves of course.
Last edited: