Question on Edata results..

[AgentEran]

So I have a quick question, we all know on edata they stopped listing actual mgs of the compounds found. What they do list is the ratio.. My question is with the given weight of the pill is it at all possible to even estimate the actual mgs?

 

[stoneddave]

No you cannot...a pill could weigh 500mg, with 100mg being MDMA; the rest, inactive fillers, and another one could weigh 500mg, with 5mg being MDMA; the rest, inactive fillers. Both pills would say MDMA - 1, on edata.

 

[LSDMDMA&AMP]

they never DID list the mg.
they'd publish things the DEA already made available to the public, look back other than in like 1996 its all ratios, unless they themselves got the data from someone else (LEO/DEA)

 

[AgentEran]

Thanks for the answers guys.

 

[snafu]

On edata they have results from Streework, a European testing group, and they actually show mg's, but it isn't help if you're in the US

 

[snafu]

But there were some pokeballs a couple years ago that the DEA tested and released the amount of MDMA in mg's, and a couple other pills

 

[avcpl]

So I have a quick question, we all know on edata they stopped listing actual mgs of the compounds found. What they do list is the ratio.. My question is with the given weight of the pill is it at all possible to even estimate the actual mgs?

If you knew the mg of one of the active ingredients you could figure it out. I suppose it would be unethical to take a pill, crush it, add 10mg of say xanax, re-press it (or put in a capsule, but that would cost more to test) and then get the ratio of xanax to mdma.

but then again, it's pretty unethical (even criminal some would say) of the DEA to prevent the reporting of mgs when it could be vital to harm reduction....

 

[bigNhurting]

the feds arent in the business of harm reduction, despite the image they may give off to the public.