I can relate a bit to the OP here.
I've always wondered whether psychedelics were as powerfully therapeutic to the average person as they are to me. When I talk to my mother about the benefits that I've seen as a result of psychedelic usage, she tells me that they're simply a chemical substitute for the joys and healing power of nature, friendship, etc. Well, maybe for her they are. There's something about the psychedelic nirvana that is untouchable by any common sober experience, I've found. Yes, during the course of one's sober life, by and by there will be great and joyous experiences to be had, but one cannot count on these to arise at any regularity or frequency, as they can with a psychedelic regimen. Why wait for perfect natural conditions, when you've been gifted access to these relatively benign yet powerful chemicals?
I really think that when my mother speaks of psychedelics and their uselessness, she speaks in ignorance of their true capability. However, that hasn't stopped me from pondering the huge gap between my sober and psychedelically-induced states of mind... do some people really have such a glowing sober life that drugs would have no particularly attractive effect? Is this, perhaps, why they remain illegal? In the eyes of most, the costs truly do outweigh the minimal benefits? Or perhaps, because of their biology, psychedelics simply cannot affect them in a profound way? Hard to believe...