TurelGrigori
Greenlighter
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 64
My tentative conclusion is that there aren't any good tests for deciding if your upper or middlish GI is in good shape regarding flora and fauna, at least not clinically available. In a research setting they might have all kinds of experimental means. Stool samples kind of give you some idea about the state of things at the end of the colon and in the rectum. Scope type procedures are about tissue and system functioning rather than flora or fauna. There is a radio labeled urea breath test to investigate if h.pylori is present in the upper GI, but there are questions about if that test is worth it given its high cost and possibility of inaccurate results.
http://www.klaire.com/images/StoolCultures.pdf
http://www.klaire.com/images/StoolCultures.pdf
klaire said:When fecal material is assiduously collected, rapidly processed, and
cultured with careful anaerobic technique, the results primarily reflect
cultivable microbes predominating in the descending colon and
rectum. Stool cultures do not reflect the microflora of the small
intestine and cecum. Fecal cultures that report semiquantitative
numbers of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species are poor guides
to the need for and possible benefits of probiotics. Stool cultures
cannot accurately assess probiotic bowel colonization.