Dtergent
Bluelight Crew
I don't know. I guess I'm in the middle on this one. While polyamory would definitely be a more common occurrence without existing relationship norms, I feel like some of my polyamorous friends thoroughly overthink relations, and it becomes almost an ideology. Love and relationships are certainly difficult areas to have ideologies in.
I've been in the same relationship for more than a decade, and I can see that my partner is definitely a monogamous elephant of a guy, and I probably tend to be more of the "polyamorous persusasion". However, it's no big deal for me to avoid having relationships with other people, because I don't want to screw it up with this guy. It's not like I chain myself to the bed at night to stop myself from jumping or spending time with other people. I suppose it's like not wearing some kind of perfume that makes your SO get massive allergies. I would definitely "fight for my rights" if I was with someone who I loved less, but in this case, it's no big deal.
I accept that the ego plays a big role in limiting other partners, as it does in all parts of our lives. But what people say is "natural to human beings" is irrelevant in this area, for me. It's like vegetarians arguing on the basis of teeth type. It drives me up the wall, really.
Many layers of culture and societal norming have been lain on top. For instance, I'm sure there are economic and health (disease) reasons for societies favoring monogamy and such, and they are translated into rules and more rigid social expectations. Furthermore, I believe that possibly, it just allows (especially in contexts where there is a lot of physical work and etc. involved in maintaining a household) for people to take better care of each other rather than spread their efforts over several.
It calls to mind the statement in the Orchid Thief: “There are too many ideas and things and people. Too many directions to go. I was starting believe the reason it matters to care about something is that it whittles the world down to a more manageable size.”
Again, I believe polyamory is an option. I don't think there is a right or wrong, it's a choice that a person makes for themselves, and then that a couple makes together. What matters is their common choice is compatible.
I've been in the same relationship for more than a decade, and I can see that my partner is definitely a monogamous elephant of a guy, and I probably tend to be more of the "polyamorous persusasion". However, it's no big deal for me to avoid having relationships with other people, because I don't want to screw it up with this guy. It's not like I chain myself to the bed at night to stop myself from jumping or spending time with other people. I suppose it's like not wearing some kind of perfume that makes your SO get massive allergies. I would definitely "fight for my rights" if I was with someone who I loved less, but in this case, it's no big deal.
I accept that the ego plays a big role in limiting other partners, as it does in all parts of our lives. But what people say is "natural to human beings" is irrelevant in this area, for me. It's like vegetarians arguing on the basis of teeth type. It drives me up the wall, really.
Many layers of culture and societal norming have been lain on top. For instance, I'm sure there are economic and health (disease) reasons for societies favoring monogamy and such, and they are translated into rules and more rigid social expectations. Furthermore, I believe that possibly, it just allows (especially in contexts where there is a lot of physical work and etc. involved in maintaining a household) for people to take better care of each other rather than spread their efforts over several.
It calls to mind the statement in the Orchid Thief: “There are too many ideas and things and people. Too many directions to go. I was starting believe the reason it matters to care about something is that it whittles the world down to a more manageable size.”
Again, I believe polyamory is an option. I don't think there is a right or wrong, it's a choice that a person makes for themselves, and then that a couple makes together. What matters is their common choice is compatible.